January 31st, 2010

Infidelity and vengeance intersect at the core of Malcolm Venville’s debut feature-film, “44 Inch Chest.” Expanding this weekend to New York, Washington D.C. and additional California venues, with more openings in the coming months, the film is written by the “Sexy Beast” screenwriting duo Louis Mellis and David Scinto. “44 Inch Chest” reunites “Sexy Beast” co-stars Ray Winstone and Ian McShane in a cast which includes John Hurt, Tom Wilkinson, Joanne Whalley, Stephen Dillane, and Melvil Poupaud. Steven Berkoff makes an appearance in a part which, undoubtedly, will not be spooky in the slightest.

Bob Grimm of Tucson Weekly believes “Jesus needs to step in and stop all these lame biblical films.”

Exploring themes of family and identity, the documentary “Off and Running” from director Nicole Opper has been crisscrossing North America at festival screenings for almost a year. Subtitled “An American Coming of Age Story,” the film focuses on a Brooklyn family with an inquisitive, adoptive teenaged daughter.

Dunno Y . . . Na Jaane Kyun promises Bollywood’s first gay kiss, reports The Times.

One Film Wonder: One of the most illustrious acting teachers of the 20th century, whose students are a roster of Hollywood’s greatest movie icons — James Dean, Marilyn Monroe, Montgomery Clift, Paul Newman, et al.– Lee Strasberg appeared in only 8 films as a credited cast member during a film career spanning 44 years. A foremost exponent of “Method Acting,” he co-founded the Group Theatre in 1931 and became director of the Actors Studio in 1951. In 1974, at the age of 73, he played Hyman Roth in “The Godfather: Part II” and received an Academy Award nomination as Best Supporting Actor. Following his unexpected success, he made several films in the decade, including “…And Justice for All,” “Boardwalk,” and “Going in Style.” But Strasberg’s delicate performance as the intelligent and honor bound Roth resonates most strongly, especially as he counsels Michael Corleone, played by former student Al Pacino, that “this is the business we’ve chosen.”


Up in the Air & Invictus

Grounded for Life

January 22nd, 2010

watch-up-in-the-air-movie-online-free-460x2751
“Up in the Air” is a timely film. Interspersed with the plight of a narcissistic hired-to-fire frequent flyer named Ryan Bingham are sobering portraits of actual folks discarded during this current economic maelstrom. The movie also has a timeless quality. Based on Walter Kim’s 2001 novel, the crisply clever screenplay by director Jason Reitman and co-writer Sheldon Turner addresses universal themes which bubble up when one re-evaluates life’s priorities as a cog in the capricious corporate rat race. Reitman’s third feature — following “Thank You for Smoking” and “Juno” — is a contemporary and classic story told with smarts and deft comedy, both light and dark. He makes films which may be a bit too varnished – with protagonists whose slick dialogue obfuscates as well as entertains – but they are confident and observant projects while perhaps not as penetrating or poignant as they first appear.

Bingham (George Clooney) works for a company, Career Transition Counseling, which is hired by businesses too scared to do their own firing. It’s his dream job; Bingham is, eerily, perfectly suited psychologically to his profession; he has an almost Zen-like ability to sit serenely across the table from the crushed and wounded. (Withering outbursts are delivered by both professional actors, and non-actors who lost their jobs in the recession and were hired by Reitman for these roles.) Bingham appears to have a personality which can experience the wrenching angst without taking it onboard; he’s like an emotional Sky Miles loofah.

A bachelor in his 40s, he loves his itinerant life. Bingham dashes through a pampered life soaking up daily thanks at ticket counters and checkout desks. Contrary to the vast majority of sane individuals, he adores airports. He logs 322 days on the road and “43 miserable days at home” in an Omaha apartment so antiseptically unscathed it appears to be inhabited by the world’s dullest monk. During one of his Admirals Club layovers, he meets a fellow addicted business traveler, played by Vera Farmiga. They engage in a high-stakes card game, flinging credit cards and reward cards of ever increasing status in a sassy and flirtatious riposte. They’re turned on by this elite game of Snap. Farmiga plays Alex Goran with bravado reminiscent of Rosalind Russell.

But perhaps this is apropos as Clooney is as close as we have in modern American film to the Hollywood star of the 1940s and 1950s; he’s like William Holden, but with more sincerity. With charming crow’s feet creasing his face with every rakish smile, Clooney is so consummately good looking that he appears to have a full mouth even though his upper lip has the slim definition of a cigarette case. In a year when he’s produced outstanding work – the wicked comic mania of Lyn Cassady in the unfairly maligned “The Men Who Stare at Goats” and crafty voiceover work as the titular “Fantastic Mr. Fox” – his performance as Ryan Bingham rounds off the decade in style.

The tranquility of Bingham’s nomadic modus vivendi – which could be dubbed “Ryan Air” — is jettisoned by the influence of a tightly-wound upstart named Natalie Keener (the commendable Anna Kendrick), who impresses her CTC bosses with a radical company overhaul combining cost cutting with modern technology. A recent Ivy League graduate, Natalie has devised a business plan with the painfully forced amalgamation of the words global and local: “Glocal.” This means that the firings will be done remotely from Nebraska. Desperate and defiant, Ryan takes Natalie along on a road trip. Natalie’s presence initiates in Ryan a slowly gestating process of reassessment. (In a nice touch, it’s not Natalie’s example which directly leads to Ryan’s contemplation.) He begins to think about relationships and family. He ponders the hollowness of his life and a facile side gig as a motivational speaker. The treatment of his predicament is believable and bolstered by Clooney’s strong bearing, even if, at times, the scenes, especially during a visit to his hometown for his sister’s wedding, feel cursory. As his protégé, of a sort, Kendrick delivers a nicely nuanced performance. Natalie is driven professionally, but retains a likable innocence, admitting to Ryan and Alex during a confessional conversation in an airport terminal that she desires the type of man who the “only thing he loves more than me is his Golden Lab.” But the character of Natalie is too young to be sympathetic. Feeling sorry for her, especially in this economy, doesn’t seem appropriate. And the film bears the smooth sheen of a James L. Brooks film. “Up in the Air” is worth checking out even if Reitman fashions a movie whose title could very well sum up a viewer’s ambiguity.

Invictus
“Invictus” is a solid film from the prodigious Clint Eastwood mounted on a stunning central performance from Morgan Freeman. The story scans the brief time between Nelson Mandela’s release from prison on February 11, 1990, to the summer of 1995, when South Africa won the Rugby World Cup. The vast majority of the film covers the even more narrow period between Mandela’s inauguration as president in May 1994 to the final match in June 1995. The new leader envisions South Africa’s hosting of the illustrious sporting event as an invaluable component towards the “reconciliation” of the new “Rainbow Nation.” Eastwood quickly captures the simultaneous moods of expectancy and trepidation in a land of fractious race relations. Into this unenviable, volatile cauldron, Mandela steps with graceful determination.

The film is firmly centered on the phenomenal performance by Freeman as Nelson Mandela. Freeman avoids caricature, which would have been occurred if he’d adopted Mandela’s distinctive, pinched speaking voice. Instead he provides the audience with an experience more impressive and profound than mimicry. It’s not an impersonation, it’s an embodiment. His Mandela, as appears to be the case in actuality, is strong and humble. Freeman portrays Mandela as regal but approachable, opinionated but free of haughtiness. He is inspirational and influential but not dominating, let alone domineering. Mandela gains esteem from both supporters and opponents through the sincere melding of actions and words. (One of the films best sequences chronicles how Mandela appeals to a newly created South African sports council to support the Spingboks, the national rugby side historically symbolic of the apartheid system. To attest to the cultural resistance, in June 1994, black South Africans avidly cheered for England in a match held in South Africa.) When he utters “Forgiveness liberates the soul” to a revolutionary comrade in his integrated security detail, it doesn’t sound like new age twaddle but as a reasoned belief bred by 27 imprisoned years, years counseled by the words of the poem by the late 19th century poet William Earnest Henley which Mandela kept on a scrap of paper during his incarceration and from which the film takes its title. “I am the master of my fate; I am the captain of my soul,” the poem concludes. As presented by Freeman, the extraordinary Mandela does not come across as a mythic figure. Instead he exemplifies an honorable, heroic everyman. (As befitting a self-effacing everyman, he is fallible: the film hints at the difficulties that the father of a country faces in his own family life.)

For a sports film, the thrilling match reenactments are well constructed. Matt Damon bulks up admirably to authentically play Francois Pienaar, the triumphant South African captain whose own father initially despises and mocks Mandela. Damon, looking nothing like his pudgy pencil pusher in “The Informant!,” compliments Freeman in a decidedly secondary, but crucial role. The script by Anthony Peckham from John Carlin’s non-fiction account avoids cliché. The soundtrack, however, is not so lucky. In several instances, a scene is undercut by a hideous pop song. But the soundtrack is the only contentious element in a proficient motion picture propelled by a history lesson modern and eternal.


Fantastic Mr. Fox

Going Underground

January 12th, 2010

fantastic_mr_fox_t_sample1
The colors burst onto the screen like a splendid, sunkissed autumn afternoon. From the first moments of Wes Anderson’s stop-motion adaptation of Roald Dahl’s novella, “Fantastic Mr. Fox” glows with the majestic tones of fall, those infinitesimal delineations of oranges, yellows, reds and browns. The original illustrations in Dahl’s book by Donald Chaffin were straightforward and understated while the artwork was re-imagined by Quentin Blake as delicate pictures like faded watercolors. Anderson and director of photography Tristan Oliver – the cinematographer on the splendid stop-motion “Chicken Run” and “Wallace & Gromit in The Curse of the Were-Rabbit” – have draped the tale in a decidedly more rugged, vibrant and vivid palette. The animation of this hand-made country life is gorgeous, robust and deep. Cider glistens with honeycomb effervescence. The faces of the menagerie of anthropomorphic animals twinkle with perception. Whiskers sway softly in the wind. Visually, the film is a marvel.

The superb style binds a fast paced adventure. Mr. Fox is a smooth talking canine, stealing chickens, turkeys and cider from the region’s three most powerful farmers –Boggs, Bunce and Bean – even though the thefts feed his vanity, not mouths, and he has already promised his wife that he has ceased his filching ways. As voiced by the velvety-toned George Clooney, Mr. Fox is sly and resourceful, and as persuasive as a barker. He’s a tad too sure and a half-step ahead of danger. The farmers’ collective revenge exacted by terrible tractors and a cider flood uproots not only his family, but forces the entire animal population to become bunkered in an underground warren from which the fantastic one vows to free them.

In the midst of this upheaval, the animal characters are familiar Anderson personalities; a collection of complicated, delicate, hesitant and proud souls. Even the confident, titular fox is momentarily conflicted. (Included in a large ensemble of voices are Bill Murray as the agitated Badger, Mr. Fox’s attorney, and an almost unrecognizable Willem Dafoe as the scurrilous Rat.) Anderson and co-writer Noah Baumbach pepper the script with constantly clever and funny moments. In a comic highlight, Owen Wilson delivers, in his delicious, inimitable twang, a witty cameo as Coach Skip explaining the wild cricket-baseball hybrid known as Whack Bat. But the film is unafraid to be poignant as well. Anderson continues to explore his recurrent theme of dissection, the subterranean world here peeled back like the hull of the Belafonte in “The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou.” In “Fantastic Mr. Fox,” he burrows deeper still into lives rich and untidy. Jason Schwartzman brings a vulnerable and perturbed flavor to Ash, Mr. and Mrs. Fox’s insecure adolescent son who is intimidated by the presence of his no-effort, over-achieving cousin, Kristofferson. And the film contains perhaps the tenderest scene in an Anderson film yet when Fox and his long-suffering (even in fox years) wife engage in a moving and honest dialogue about their relationship on a thin platform in front of a shimmering waterfall. As they stand before the brilliant sheet of water, Mrs. Fox, voiced by Meryl Streep, releases a bitter truth which pricks his self-assurance and swipes at his swagger: “I love you too, but I shouldn’t have married you.”

“Fantastic Mr. Fox” is an intrepid physical and emotional experience with a great escape by motorcycle ending, as you might expect from an Anderson flick, with a quirky dance right out of a Charlie Brown special. Like Spike Jonze a few months ago with “Where the Wild Things Are,” Anderson is a dynamic director who risked adapting a hallowed author’s children’s book and succeeded in making a remarkable film which retains his artistic sensibility while beautifully complimenting the original source


An Education

High School Confidential

December 11th, 2009

an_education3
In 1980, a 33-year-old Benny Mardones trolled and wailed on his one-hit wonder, slow-dance anthem, “Into the Night,” with the strained effort of Sisyphus at the crest of the hill.

She’s just sixteen years old
Leave her alone, they say
Separated by fools
Who don’t know what love is yet
But I want you to know

If I could fly
I’d pick you up
I’d take you into the night
And show you a love
Like you’ve never seen, ever seen

It’s, charitably, an unsettling ode. Because I was entering high school as the tune moved up the charts, the song’s refrain was particularly ominous. As a teen, it was hard enough vying with my peers for the attention of our female classmates; it was made an all-the-more daunting task when girls would be escorted to dances by mustached dates who owned their own cars, had their own apartments and whose yearbook photos were already becoming musty. Youth was sufficiently disconcerting without house parties being crashed by Keith Hernandez clones in Girbaud jeans.

It was Benny’s track looping in my head when I saw “An Education” the unevenly toned tale of a preternaturally composed and sophisticated 16-year-old’s romantic relationship with a flash, older man in early 1960s London. Based on Lynn Barber’s memoir, director Lone Scherfig’s fair yet unsustaining film follows the bright and mature Jenny (Carey Mulligan) as the Oxford hopeful embarks on a dubious courtship during a whirlwind last year of secondary school.

At home, Jenny is harried by an unyielding father (an arch Alfred Molina as Jack) who is obsessed with having his daughter gain entrance into Oxford. He insists on Latin and cello lessons as resume stuffers. One rainy day, after compulsory cello practice, she’s offered a ride in a slick car by a smooth man who must be nothing less than in his md-20s, even though his exact age is not revealed in the film. (In an illuminating interview, Barber told The Guardian this summer that the actual man who picked her up “was –he said – 27, but was probably in his late 30s.” The well-bred David (Peter Sarsgaard, adopting a more than passable English accent) begins to court the teen with the awareness of her parents. He treats Jenny to classical concerts, takes her to nightclubs, ushers her to a selective auction and introduces her to his wealthy friends Danny, (played ably by Dominic Cooper) and his dim girlfriend, Helen (a resoundingly good Rosamund Pike), who contorts her face into an assortment of befuddled expressions. Against this competition, Graham, a skittish but sweet classmate who pines for Jenny, doesn’t stand a chance. The film at this point doesn’t seem terribly concerned that it’s a school night every night for our teen.

Due to her father’s desperation to get his only daughter into a specific university — and her mother Margaret’s acquiescence (Cara Seymour, in a dutiful but thankless role) — Jenny is allowed to dash away with David for a weekend at Oxford, under the fabricated excuse that she’ll meet one of David’s former tutors, C.S. Lewis. Enveloped in this adult world of bon vivants and rapscallions, she becomes, predictably, bored with her high school life; in turn, the school’s headmistress (Emma Thompson, doing yeoman’s work) and her literature teacher, Miss Stubbs (Olivia Williams) are cast as parochial for their disapproval.

Despite a first-rate ensemble and attractive visuals – with pleasing cinematography by John de Borman, production design by Andrew McApline and set decoration by Anna Lynch-Robinson — “An Education” doesn’t have much novel to say about those gap years between adolescence and adulthood. Surprisingly, for a Nick Hornby script, the dialogue doesn’t sing; this is Hornby’s first screenplay since 1997’s “Fever Pitch.” Jenny doesn’t narrate the story, or keep a diary, or have a best friend in whom she confides. Mulligan provides a strong performance but the film feels episodic and it too often lacks emotional specifics. After David whisks her away to Paris for a weekend, Jenny sighs with almost forced naivety “I never did anything before I met you,” with the innocence of a gold medal winning teenaged gymnast breathlessly saying that “I’ve dreamt of this moment my whole life.” When the movie does confront the more serious consequences of the relationship, it skims over them. “An Education” even falls back on a musical montage of Jenny studying. Admittedly it would be quite boring to film a person reading in real-time, but the sequence feels like a replacement for insight into her attitudes and thoughts as she prepares for college life. And when her father undergoes a change of heart, it’s an example of how a movie can deliver an epiphany unearned. (But it does give him a chance to leave three biscuits and a cuppa at her bedroom door as an apologetic gesture.) At one point Jenny exclaims, “Silly schoolgirls are always getting seduced by glamorous older men.” Even silly schoolboys know that.


December 4th, 2009

Nominated earlier this week for two Film Independent Spirit Awards, “Zero Bridge” is the feature-film debut from director and screenwriter Tariq Tapa which is currently screening across the globe.

Jack Stevenson at Bright Light Film Journal uncovers the story of “Porno to the People –The Danish Revolution That Liberated America.”

Based on the book by Steve McVicker, “I Love You Phillip Morris” stars Jim Carrey and Ewan McGregor as cell mates and soul mates. With a February 2010 release date, the film is the first directorial effort from “Cats & Dogs” and “Bad Santa” screenwriters Glenn Ficarra and John Requa.

One Film Wonder: Born in Nova Scotia, Harold Russell was a U.S. Army instructor at Camp MacKall in North Carolina when he lost both his hands from a TNT explosion in 1944. Afterwards, Russell appeared in an Army training film which was seen by director William Wyler, who cast the non-professional actor in “The Best Years of Our Lives” in the role of Homer Parrish. The 1946 film — which chronicled the adjustment of three American soldiers (including Frederic March and Dana Andrews) to post-war life upon their return to their Midwestern hometown — won 7 Oscars, including Best Picture. Russell earned the Best Actor in a Supporting Role accolade and also received an Honorary Oscar “for bringing hope and courage to his fellow veterans through his appearance in ‘The Best Years of Our Lives.’” He is still the only person to win two Oscars for the same performance. With a university business degree earned following his appearance in the film, Russell became immersed in advocating for veterans’ groups. After a 34-year gap, Russell appeared in his second film, 1980s “Inside Moves.” He had roles in two other films: 1990s “Payback” and 1997’s “Dogtown.” Russell died in 2002.


Le combat dans l’île

Love and Rockets

December 4th, 2009

combat_dans_lille215
Alain Cavalier’s “Le combat dans l’île” is the wrong length. At 104 minutes, the estimable 1962 French New Wave drama sizzles with the intrigue of a mystery and the urgency of a political thriller, but still maturely plumbs the romantic entanglements of a complex love triangle. Centering on an assassination attempt, the movie is packed with a cornucopia of disparate elements, including union strife, an international manhunt, illness, a theater production and a vengeful duel. Reportedly intended as an indictment of French right-wing fervency in the early 1960s, “Le combat dans l’île” works just as well, if not better, when it is simply the compelling story about the mysterious inflections of the heart. It’s audacious filmmaking for a debut film. But Cavalier would have been well served to give his feature some slack. I’m not a fan of films padding extraneously, but “Le combat” could have easily added half an hour without trying a viewer’s patience — the three engaging main characters are intriguing enough to warrant deeper inspection and the events which embroil them are amply sturdy and significant to support more penetrating scrutiny.

With eyebrows like a swan’s unfurled wings, Romy Schneider plays the restless Anne, a bored Parisian housewife in her early 20s, with a coquettish flourish. (Schneider, who was on her way at the age of 24 to forging a reputation as one of Europe’s most coveted actresses, possesses a seductive allure which suggests Simone Signoret’s younger sister.) Anne has been married for just a few years to Clément, a cinched-up, dour, industrialist’s son just a tad older than her who quits the family business to covertly scheme for a violent anti-communist, anti-democratic extremist group. Jean-Louis Trintignant portrays Clément with his signature placid, inscrutable face (which he’d use to magnificent effect later in the decade as The Examining Magistrate in 1969’s “Z”).

When the couple does venture out to places which enthrall Anne, like smoky jazz clubs, the former actress is back in her element while hubby seethes. A bubbly persona with a penchant for champagne, her flirting may be inconsiderate but his reaction is brutish; Clément treats governments and love interests by a single authoritarian mantra: “power must be seized.”

The film provides no back story to their relationship, so it’s hard to imagine how they met. Yet Schneider and Trintignant are such strong presences that they intensely convey the way seemingly mismatched couples can become concatenated. This ill-fitting union possesses its own personal kinesis so that even steely eyes can seduce. But those seductive moments are fleeting.

Anne may be looking for excitement, but a search of a hallway closet unearths an entirely unexpected discovery, a carefully-wrapped bazooka. Clément passes off the weapon’s importance; Anne seems less distressed by the munitions than the fact that despite the sparing moments of consuming passion, her husband is a dud. Soon after, Clément carries out a heinous, politically-motivated terrorist act.

Fleeing from Paris after his nefarious crime, the couple hide out at the country house of Clément’s childhood friend, Paul (Henri Serre, fresh from his role as Jim in “Jules et Jim”), who knows nothing of Clément’s actions. (Anne doesn’t make any connection either.) A young widower, Paul is a printer immersed in a bucolic life with a friendly, grounded disposition as warm as the fisherman’s cable knit sweaters he favors. With his round eyes, pronounced nose and full lips, Paul has the oversized features of a sculptor’s model. Expressive without being flamboyant, Paul is the political and physical antithesis of his distant chum. As the three linger after dinner on the first evening listening to the radio, Cavalier delivers a clever and riveting scene as the targeted politician reveals to a national audience a double cross among the perpetrators by playing a surreptitious tape recording; this is where the full extent of Clément’s barbarity is revealed to Anne.

Found out, Clément dashes off to South America alone, but not before he is unequivocally condemned by his childhood friend; Anne, though, is still, strangely, emotionally entangled. As Anne and Paul remain and begin their own relationship, “Le combat” takes on a hurried pace. The gestation of the new romance feels comparatively rushed to the earlier sequences. Like the untold history of Anne and Clément, Paul’s past is touched upon but not examined to the depth that a film as robust as “Le combat” could have handled. (Clément’s journey to the Americas is told in a few solitary images.) The film is interspersed throughout with quickly shown images, almost like photographs, with the camera shuttering brief, enigmatic glimpses. It’s an interesting technique but with so much happening to the new couple – including Anne falling ill, the two of them moving to Paris, Paul setting up a print shop, Anne reborn as an actress with the unveiling of a new play, and a quietly intense roundtrip drive out of the country for a decidedly private matter – these snippets seems incidental. The condensed movie could have prospered from more detail and exposition being focused on these challenging and instrumental episodes.

“Le combat” is bolstered by the evocative black and white cinematography of Pierre Lhomme. Scenes in both the urban settings and the countryside are shot through diffused light, as though set in misty daybreak or dusky sunset. Lhomme wonderfully incorporates shadows throughout the film, but especially effectively in the Parisian milieu.

When Clément returns, one act of revenge in Argentina has hardly sated his lust for retribution. With his skewed sense of honor as the focal point, the plot takes on a vibe that you believe will submerge the film in noir fatalism. Cavalier’s first directorial effort avoids this fate but concludes with a melodramatic climax and a lingering sensation that a very fine film could have been richer still with another reel on the projector.


November 20th, 2009

Colin Firth stars as “A Single Man” in Tom Ford’s first film which opens next month. The cast includes Julianne Moore, Matthew Goode and Nicholas Hoult.

Bill Nighy reveals to Patrick Barkham of The Guardian that “I am not suddenly the greatest actor in the world.”

Willem Dafoe, Chloë Sevigny, Brad Dourif and Michael Shannon appear in Werner Herzog’s “My Son, My Son, What Have Ye Done.” Inspired by a true crime event, the film reaches theaters in North America beginning next month.

Min Lee of The Associate Press writes about Lou Ye and his latest film, “Spring Fever” as “Banned director brings romance film to Hong Kong.” Strand Releasing will present the film in the United States.

One Film Wonder: The exceedingly influential French director Jean Vigo had a brief film career totaling only four projects. He directed his first short film, “À propos de Nice” at the age of 25 in 1930. The following year he shot an experimental film recording the movements of French swimming sensation Jean Taris in the water. In 1933, he made “Zero for Conduct,” a 41-minute boarding school drama. The next year, he released his only feature-length film, “L’Atalante,” the cinematically important tale of a jealous canal barge captain and his new bride. (The film’s cinematographer was Boris Kaufman, who twenty years later would begin a Hollywood career which included filming “On the Waterfront,” “12 Angry Men,” and “The Pawnbroker.”) In October 1934, a month after the release of “L’Atalante,” Vigo died, aged 29, of complications from tuberculosis. Both France and Spain bestow annual directing awards in his name. In France, the Prix Jean Vigo has been given to directors such as Alain Resnais, Jean-Luc Godard and Olivier Assayas.


Nothing But a Man & Putney Swope

Indivisible Man

November 20th, 2009

SF31813
Portland, Oregon hosted an inaugural African American Film Festival this past weekend. Founded by Ron Craig – who also coordinates the Astoria International Film Festival – the PDX AAFF movies were divided into four categories: social contemporary (“Carmen Jones,” “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”); classic films (“Imitation of Life,” “Cabin in the Sky”); progressive films (“Jo Jo Dancer, Your Life is Calling,” “She’s Gotta Have It”) and blaxploitation (“Shaft,” “Superfly,” and “Cleopatra Jones”). I saw two films during the festival — 1964’s incisive “Nothing But a Man” and 1969’s farcical “Putney Swope” — which afforded me a rare opportunity to see works from beyond the fringe which are generally regarded as seminal.

In Michael Roemer’s remarkable “Nothing But a Man,” Ivan Dixon plays Duff Anderson, a railroad worker in a 1960s small Alabama town not far from Birmingham, who grapples with his inner struggle of confronting the barrage of racial prejudice he faces without destroying his own soul. He shares cramped, temporary accommodations with half a dozen of his fellow “section gang” — including Yaphet Kotto in his first film role — in a threadbare bunkhouse. They pass the time playing checkers on a broken-in-two board with bottle caps for pieces. Seemingly older than his mid-20s, Duff is reserved and mostly keeps to himself and Dixon provides the role with a charismatic presence of simmering intensity suggesting pain concealed just below the surface but easily rubbed raw. The film gives him ample instances to excel in a part reportedly first offered to Dixon’s close friend, Sidney Poitier.

One evening, after downing a beer at a working class pool parlor, Duff visits a church where the choir exclaims, “Take My Hand, Precious Lord.” Duff meets Josie, a 26-year-old school teacher who returned to the town after attending college in Birmingham; she’s also the Reverend’s daughter. Blessed with a soft voice and furtive eyes, Abbey Lincoln invests Josie with a resolve which belies her timid demeanor. (Revered to this day as a jazz singer, this was Lincoln’s first film role in a career of just a few scant appearances.) Duff stays for the church supper but not for the service, as he leaves with the trilling of the guest preacher warbling into the street.

On their first date, Duff and Josie visit a lively dance hall. Little Stevie Wonder is blaring on the sound system. (The Motown songs supplement the harmonica soundtrack by Wilbur Kirk throughout the film. And this is an authentic Motown soundtrack. The story of how Roemer discovered the music of the burgeoning record company that he used in this film is found here). Duff is circumspect early in the evening, wondering why Josie is “slumming” with a railroad worker. ”What are you doing with a cat like me in a joint like this?” Duff asks directly. Josie is intrigued by Duff’s bluntness. When they drive to a secluded location to talk further, they are taunted by two white men in their later teens who menacingly lean against the passenger side, calling Duff “boy.” Sitting at the wheel of his borrowed car, Duff challenges the young men to stop their taunts. They recognize Josie as the preacher’s daughter and move on, but not without some last, lewd comments. “They don’t sound human, do they?” Duff asks rhetorically. (The scene vividly encapsulates the hint of violence underpinning these exchanges but more specifically the complete racial contempt and derision the young men feel no compunction to hide.) As they drive afterwards to her home, Josie recalls a lynching eight years before in the town. “My father knew who did it but he didn’t say anything,” she says matter-of-factly, allowing her father’s complicity to speak for itself. Duff, essentially, proposes to Josie at the end of the date.

As a first date, it’s remarkably frank and forthright. The astute script by Robert M. Young (who was also the film’s cinematographer) and Roemer elicits candor without staginess. Characters speak with a stark openness. The conversations – from intense arguments to casual banter – throughout the movie are transfused with insight and illumination; this is a film which does not countenance bullshit. “Nothing But a Man” is about how a black man deals with the indignities of racial prejudice, but it’s perhaps more interested in the internal impact than the external racial confrontations. The story concentrates on how the treatment Duff suffers from translates to his attitude towards his relationships and to himself. As the film adds more scenarios, Duff is challenged to examine and determine his moral fate not just distinctly as a black man but as a man.

Intrigued with each other, a romance begins between Duff and Josie. He reveals that he is an Army veteran, once stationed in Japan, who, after returning, went up North, but found that “it ain’t that good up there, either.” (But as forthright as Duff appears, he still fails to tell Josie until they are quite serious about the 4 year-old son he has from a relationship long ended.) Roemer astutely captures the social distinctions of this small, Southern town when Duff goes to Josie’s house and shakes the hand of the Reverend but when he’s introduced to the white superintendent of schools who calls him “boy”, neither extends a hand. “You’ve got to go easy,” the superintendent reminds the young man. But Duff doesn’t tolerate appeasement without equality. He and the Reverend engage in pointed rows about black acquiescence. The Reverend, who remains silent as murderers walk free, dislikes Duff doubly: for his views but, perhaps more importantly, his vocation. Not overly political, Duff is addressing the topic of how a black man in 1960s America should be treated as a fundamental question of existence. For Duff, it’s a matter of human rights, not just civil rights.

When Duff ventures to Birmingham, a series of sad, unsettling scenes marks his return. He visits his son in a derelict apartment. The child’s mother has abandoned him with an unconcerned babysitter, but, at that moment, all Duff does is drop some bills on a table so the babysitter can care for the toddler. During the same trip, Duff seeks out his dad, Will, (Julius Harris in the first film role of a lengthy career) a despicable, angry alcoholic. Duff is not there to confront his father but simply to observe. Roemer crafts a strong scene at a local bar as Duff and his dad’s girlfriend, Lee (Gloria Foster, the acclaimed stage actress who played The Oracle in “The Matrix.”), dance closely to Martha and the Vandellas’ “Heatwave,” under Will’s watchful eye. There’s a palpable edginess to this moment. It’s not a sexual tension between Duff and Lee, but a connection more like a kinship with both of them suffering from such a tortured, hostile man.

Once Duff and Josie marry, he quits the railroad for a clocking-in job. This brings him closer to the racism, white compliance and black capitulation he so despises. After he tells his plant co-workers at lunch that they should stick together, he’s ratted out and fired. He takes a job at a gas station where almost every tank is overflowing with the open hostility of customers. But even sympathy can feel emasculating to Duff. “I don’t like to be mothered,” he spits out when Josie tries to comfort him after he loses another job. You hope he doesn’t inherit his father’s ability to wallow in anger. Will he allow the degradation imposed on him by others to rupture his goodness? As he is wracked with an inner life in turmoil, it makes you ponder, “Which cheek do you turn when both have been slapped?” It is in those moments that one wonders if they have the strength and resolve to be defiant against the dehumanization without gnashed teeth and clenched fists.

Unfortunately, “Nothing But a Man” was not a watershed moment for many of the principals. The following year, Dixon would begin a five-year stint on “Hogan’s Heroes” as Sergeant James Kinchkoe, the bilingual communications specialist, before becoming a busy TV director. Young has worked infrequently as a writer, cinematographer and director. Roemer would direct “The Plot Against Harry” in 1969 and then embark on a career in academia at Yale University, where he still teaches film studies.

It’s patronizing at times to suggest that it’s important to see a movie for its historical significance because it tends to imply that the film has very little merit otherwise. But the historical importance of “Nothing But a Man” is simply only one of a number of compelling reasons the film is laudable. Audiences in 1964 should have seen this movie for its unblinkered storytelling and truthful approach to complex relationships; in the subsequent forty-five years it has lost none of its relevance and resonance for contemporary viewers. Profound and personal, it is one of the most sincere American films of this or any year.

putney
An unapologetic and cavalier satire, Robert Downey Sr.’s “Putney Swope” isn’t subtle. After haranguing the executive board of his underperforming New York City ad agency, the cantankerous owner topples over dead onto the massive wooden board-room table. As the lifeless body lies on the table like a stiff on a mortuary slab, his successor is tallied from scraps of paper pulled out of the dead man’s hat. Due to infighting on the board, they unexpectedly choose the only black member of the executive board, Putney Swope, the agency’s musical director. Gravelly voiced, Putney (Arnold Johnson) fires almost everyone immediately. “Rocking the boat is a drag,” he insists. “You sink it.” He re-names the agency Truth and Soul. Putney is a contradictory boss — he bans accounts for companies making war toys yet his assistant openly totes a gun.

The commercials created by his new firm are artistic, convincing and even entrancing—and highly successful for the reconfigured business. In stark contrast to the black and white of the film, the ads are filmed in soothing color: A trippy, space themed spot for Lucky Airlines showcases slow-motion cavorting; a romantic, interracial couple tenderly sing a hilarious tune for the pimple remover, Faceoff; a breakfast food called Ethereal Cereal is sold with in-your-face efficacy; and a lone dancer in a smoke-filled alleyway performs a funky, undulating dance for Fan-A-Way. “You can’t eat an air conditioner,” coos the sultry model.

Downey dresses Swope in an evolving set of outfits, from his original business suit to sporting a beret with black mock turtleneck, to finally parading around the office in a Fidel Castro-like get-up. But this revolutionary angle isn’t examined too closely. (The hallways are bursting with groupies and supplicants; the abiding philosophy appears to be “Puff, Puff, Pass.”) The film falters because Johnson is not a compelling presence. Purportedly, Downey dubbed all of Johnson’s dialogue because the actor either forgot his lines, or simply mangled them. (The irony of a film about an all-white ad agency taken over by a black man, who then is dubbed by a white man can be construed as something more than just a side note.)

Beleaguered by its protagonist’s performance, “Putney Swope” has no cohesive vision. Executives line up to curry favor with Swope but corporate greed seems an all-too-obvious target. As the office becomes more chaotic and anarchic (which is quite a different thing than revolutionary) and Putney becomes more dictatorial, a subplot involving an imaginary United States president only serves as a distraction. “Putney Swope” is a concept in search of a payoff. It’s a mere 84 minutes but still feels long. In the end, the millions he’s made are sabotaged. As Putney’s pyre burns, you wonder if he shouldn’t have been tearing the roof off the sucker.


November 13th, 2009

Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster star as conflicted soldiers in “The Messenger,” the first feature film from “I’m Not There” co-writer Oren Moverman. Opening today, the film’s cast also includes Samantha Morton and Jena Malone.

In a sweeping interview, Robin Wright tells Christine Lennon of the Sunday Independent that “Change is always hard.”

Chronicling John Lennon’s adolescent years, “Nowhere Boy” is the debut film from artist Sam Taylor Wood starring Aaron Johnson as the future Beatle. Anne-Marie Duff plays John’s mother, Julia, while Kristin Scott Thomas appears as his Aunt Mimi. The film will be released in the States by The Weinstein Company but a specific date has not been announced.

Indiewire’s Peter Knegt presents “For Your Consideration: The 50 Most Despicable Oscar Snubs of the 2000s.”

One Film Wonder: Playwright and author Tom Stoppard has written 35 scripts for television and films, along with penning more than 20 plays. He’s directed only one movie, 1990’s “Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead.” Adapted from his seminal 1966 absurdist play, the film version stars Gary Oldman and Tim Roth deliciously chewing the scenery as Hamlet’s fringe characters expounded.


Mary and Max & Ponyo

Pen Pals Mesmerize in Hand Made Tale, Prodigy Returns With Fish Out of Water

November 13th, 2009

mary-and-max
Molded in clay but as brittle as bone china, Mary and Max are the fragile souls explored in Adam Elliot’s heart-rending yet hilarious stop-motion tour de force. Based on the true story of the 20-year correspondence between vulnerable pen pals, “Mary and Max” is lavished with exquisite, earthy detail and gives us two of the most richly realized and captivating characters presented in film this year. Elliot won the Best Animated Short Film Oscar for 2003s “Harvie Krumpet,” a 22-minute cavalcade of a long-suffering life. With this self described “clayography,” the Australian animator has added more than an hour to his storytelling but lost none of his emotional immediacy and comic esprit.

Mary Daisy Dinkle is a stumpy, bespectacled 8-year-old from Spotswood, a suburb of Melbourne. As noted in the flowery, funny script narrated superbly by Barry Humphries, Mary “has eyes the colour of muddy puddles and a birthmark the colour of poo.” Her father, Noel, works at a teabag factory, and retreats nightly to the backyard shed where he practices taxidermy on roadkill. Vera, her mother, is a sherry sloshing, anesthetized kleptomaniac who listens to the cricket, mindlessly avoiding the sticky wickets. Mary finds solace watching her favorite animated television show, “The Noblets,” while sitting on the settee with her pet rooster; Ethel, and supping on condensed milk. No pocket change to spare, she resourcefully makes her own Noblet toys with bits and bobs.

One day, in 1976, as her mother connives to filch from the local post office, Mary plops her finger on a random name in a New York City phone book and scribbles down the address. She sends a letter filled with the impertinent, inquiring questions only a child can ask without malice. Mary packs the envelope with her favorite sweets. The letter arrives at the dingy apartment of Max Jerry Horowitz, a 44-year-old overeating, depressive recluse with ears like skeleton keys. (This New York is blanched in the black and white of the Dead End Kids; conversely, Australia is filmed in the color of butterscotch.) Diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome, he shares his cramped quarters with a one-eyed cat named Hal, a parakeet called Mister Biscuit and an imaginary companion who goes by the name of Mr. Ravioli who hunches on a stool in a corner reading self-help books. Max gorges on a steady diet of chocolate hotdogs. Without a family of his own, Max accepts the unaccustomed role of surrogate uncle, regaling Mary with the stories of his marvelous and mad life, and unmaliciously answering questions he normally didn’t contemplate; where do babies really come from? Voiced with pitch-perfect weary recitation by Philip Seymour Hoffman, Max is a Crumb character, with a morsel of magnanimity.

The technical achievement showcased in “Mary and Max” is tremendous. The film’s production notes detail how the crew of fifty spent fifty-seven weeks creating 132,480 individual frames. They built 212 puppets and painstakingly made 808 Earl Grey teabags; they also used twelve liters of water-based sex lube for all of the water features, including tears and a river. Elliot and his crew construct Mary and Max’s specific worlds meticulously; the density of effort displayed by the wrinkles in the wallpaper.

As the pen pals trade letters through the years, the story hardens and intensifies. Voiced by a strong Toni Collette once she’s a teen, Mary graduates from college, marries and embarks on a career as an author, with distressing consequences. Fundamentally morose and always anxious, Max becomes more troubled amidst his stream of consciousness laden by personal religious and social upheaval. Trembling, he replaces Mr. Ravioli on the stool. Extremely humorous yet strangulatingly sad, “Mary and Max,” like a chocolate hotdog, is bittersweet.

Over the past dozen years, anime legend Hayao Miyazaki has created a succession of vigorous and luminous animated films. “Princess Mononoke” hurtles along like Akira Kurosawa’s “The Hidden Fortress.” The Oscar winning “Spirited Away” is a stirring fairy tale, while “Howl’s Moving Castle” is an inventive kaleidoscope. Immensely epic, complex and bold, these magical works are filled consistently with spectacular images and Shakespearean-styled characters. By comparison, his latest film, “Ponyo,” the quaint tale of a precocious goldfish with human aspirations, appears slight. It possesses the lightest tone of the four most recent Miyazaki feature films released in North America. And while it may not have been crafted specifically for tykes, it’s the first of the four to garner a G rating. This isn’t in itself a condemnation, but “Ponyo” is appreciably less visceral than its PG-rated predecessors.

After a sumptuous, wordless introduction to a teeming underwater life, the film moves above surface when the wayward goldfish is discovered by Sosuke, a 5-year-old boy who lives in a seaside village. Ponyo’s distraught dad, Fujimoto — a former human who disavowed humanity for his elaborate subaquatic sanctuary, and who looks, disconcertingly, like present-day Barry Manilow – searches for his daughter. Fujimoto’s motivation for finding her seems more skewed to the impact her human transformation will have on the world if she completes her metamorphosis than for the safety of his daughter. (Strange by a long way and voiced by a perturbed Liam Neeson, he’s a dad who always seems to be taking his work home with him.)

The sequences in the sea are wonderful. And Miyazaki crafts a fabulous set piece where hurtling tsunami-like waves, made of giant fish under Fujimoto’s spell, swirl around the village as though on a Formula 1 circuit while Ponyo, the red-headed scamp, sprints across the heads of the massive fish. The scene is bolstered by the rousing orchestration from longtime collaborator Joe Hisaishi.

But the narrative on land feels underwhelming, even when the village is flooded by the aftermath of the diluvian deluge. Miyazaki returns to his common themes of the battle between nature and humans, and continues his use of empowered female leads, but the story lacks the depth and the characters lack the intricacy of his previous efforts. Sosuke’s mom, Lisa (voiced by Tina Fey), who works at a local nursing home, is an indistinguished characterization, and his father, Koichi (Matt Damon), is a boat pilot too rarely incorporated into the plot. (There is a nifty sequence where the father and son communicate by lighted Morse code with Sosuke flickering messages from the balcony of their hilltop home while Koichi returns signals from the bridge of his boat.) The supporting parts, such as the half-dozen residents of the nursing home, are perfunctory. When the goddess of the sea and Ponyo’s mother, Gran Mamare (an ethereal beauty voiced by Cate Blanchett) appears, she hovers tranquilly, a soothing presence with hair shimmering like a shampoo commercial. Miyazaki’s previous films were a tapestry. “Ponyo” is a comforter.