Archive for September, 2008

 

Transsiberian

Ticket to Writhe

September 30th, 2008

trans
From Vladivostok, along the desolate Siberian railway line, through the scrutiny of the protagonists’ most personal turmoil, the engrossing thriller “Transsiberian” reveals its secrets like a matryoshka doll. A gripping mystery which ratchets up the suspense while exposing the intricate, introspective consequences, “Transsiberian” is a police drama with brains and brawn.

Upon completing a church mission in Beijing, a married, middle-class Iowa couple — Jessie (Emily Mortimer) and Roy (Woody Harrelson) — begins a sightseeing train journey to Moscow.  However, they aren’t drawn as Midwestern stereotypes because director Brad Anderson and co-writer Will Conroy infuse the characters with quirky individuality and plausible personality traits.  

Jessie is a thirty-something, adrift, agnostic, and ambivalent.  She does not despise the bourgeois lifestyle she could be slipping into; it just doesn’t feel quite right.  Jessie’s become a victim of her own expectation of herself.  And as a recovering addict, she not only confronts her alcoholism but the shame of her clear longing for the intoxicating allure of her partying days, the undeniable buzz of that lifestyle.  Jessie could be from Iowa, or Seattle, or Charleston, for that matter, and she’d still thirst for that time in her life when nihilism was just another way to say “make mine a double.”  In yet another nuanced performance, Mortimer emotes fragility but always girded with her doe eyes steely fixed.  

At first blush, Roy  may seem a bit of a sop, with a golly-gee wonderment at every small detail of railway life, but Harrelson doesn’t oversell the earnestness of the jocular, religious hardware store owner.  He is goofy, like the sort of guy who would mow his yard in black socks, yet he’s genuine, and he’s hardly the cuckold that you initially think he will become.  As a couple, they possess a clear fondness for each other, but their fundamental differences validate the choices the story has bestowed on them.

The relative ordinariness of their trip is usurped when they are joined as cabin mates by an enigmatically itinerant couple, the menacingly charming rascal Carlos (Eduardo Noriega) and his recalcitrant girlfriend Abby (Kate Mara).  Both Noriega and Mara embody their characters solidly, but the toothy Noriega, especially, chews the scenery with a wonderfully cheeky performance.  As Grinko, a sagacious yet still inquisitive cop, Ben Kingsley is similarly and fascinatingly multi-layered.  

Anderson is the director of indie features such as “Next Stop Wonderland” and “The Machinist” but he’s also helmed episodes of several of America’s most recently revered television police dramas, including “Homicide” and “The Wire.” And that TV experience of commingling gumshoe whodunit with insight into the peccadilloes and worse of intriguing characters is expertly manifested in several scenes where casual conversations subtly morph into an illuminating view into the characters’ psyches.

He also suffuses the railway journey with visceral earthiness and authenticity, from the claustrophobic sleeping compartments to the crowded and convivial proletariat dining cars choked with cigarette smoke, and crammed with hearty and craggy faces clinking shot glasses.

Like Scott Frank’s unjustly overlooked “The Lookout” from last year — a smart and absorbing crime flick that also centers on an equivocal Midwestern hero — “Transsiberian” unfurls a serpentine plot which, though carved with sinister switchbacks, retains a genuine attentiveness for the plight of the personal odyssey.  It’s noir, with a soul.


The Duchess

Keira, eléison

September 28th, 2008

2008_the_duchess_001
Four years ago, director Saul Dibb debuted with the present-day tale of a young, black Londoner emerging from a stint in jail with the dilemma of whether to assimilate into a familiar and destructive gun culture.  “Bullet Boy” was an intriguing topic undertaken, sadly, with a phlegmatic execution.  This year, Dibb returns with “The Duchess,” which, despite stark distinctions in race and class and an 18th century setting, addresses again the vexing theme of the ramifications of a skewed sense of duty.  But unlike its modern counterpart, “The Duchess” is robust, assured and, most usefully, buttressed by a performance from Keira Knightley in the title role which showcases that she is emerging as both a potentially substantive actress and a burgeoning movie star.

Gamine, limpid, and, at times, preternaturally thin on screen, Knightley has the air of an Avedon Harper‘s Bazaar portrait.  She is a mere slip of a girl, when she is wearing a slip. In the six years since her breakout role in “Bend It Like Beckham,“ Knightley has perfected the pretty-in-a-petticoat persona to such a degree that it can appear that she’s hemmed in contractually to a bodice.

So, as the 23-year-old Knightley evolves into adult roles, she could be well served by studying the example of Kate Winslet, whose early career trajectory has an eerie similarity to Knightley’s, but who quickly broke free from the costume-drama constraints.  Knightley appeared in “Pride and Prejudice” at the age of 20; Winslet starred in her own Austen venture, “Sense and Sensibility,” at the same age.  They both were swept up by blockbusters. Winslet, however, was able to follow her titanic success with decisive choices for roles and films outside of the comfort zone of the multiplexes. She seemed determined as an actress to seek out exceedingly intriguing characters in movies which, if not wholly satisfying, felt substantial. With demonstrative roles in the late 90s in “Hideous Kinky” and “Holy Smoke “ and more recently in, for example, “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind,” and “Little Children,“ Winslet has forged such a powerful resume that she must be considered, along with Cate Blanchett, amongst the elite on any list of the most respected actresses in the world.  Sadly, for Knightley, her massive hit became a franchise and the carnival ride appears to have no end in sight with a fourth version on the horizon, and while she has indicated that she‘s through swanning about, the paychecks on offer could sway even the most resolute thespian.

The role of Georgiana Spencer — a captivating celebrity of  late 18th century Georgian England who became the notorious Duchess of Devonshire, famed for her trendsetting fashion as well as her ardent Whig politics — could serve as a crossroads role for Knightley. It’s a costume drama but with a part presenting her with an opportunity to exude maturity and gravity.  She’s afforded in Spencer a character of a certain determined resistance toward the double standard of the age, where a male gentry’s amorous affairs were tolerated, while a woman’s were verboten.  Knightley emotes, but with a steely restraint, and she inflicts upon the character a genuine emotional tussle.  She’s delicate yet fills her part with flickers of gestures which underscore her torment.  She flashes an assortment of smiles — shy, knowing, beaming — but when she unfurls her Chiclets with conviction she can still deliver a wallop.

All of the recognizable roles of the powdered-wig brigade are in evidence in “The Duchess.”  Ralph Fiennes does yeoman’s work within the rigid boundaries of the familiar role of the cold, disinterested Duke.  He is effectively charmless but it’s a bit deflating that this gormless character doesn’t resort to “In Bruges” pyrotechnics.  Charlotte Rampling delivers an efficient turn as Georgiana’s mother, a doyen of propriety and her place.  It’s almost odd to hear Rampling speaking in English on film.  In her beguiling role as Bess Foster, Georgiana’s best friend, and, later, the object of a very peculiar arrangement, Hayley Atwell unveils a confident portrayal which suggests she will become a favorite of casting directors.  Taking on the “Colin Firth” role of Georgiana‘s dashing paramour — and what other word can one use in a film of this kind for the strapping love interest other than “dashing“ — Dominic Cooper plays Charles Grey with the proper amount of innocent longing and chest-expanding hubris.  The pithy Charles Fox, the prominent Whig politician with whom Georgiana verbally jousts, is performed with suitable panache by Simon McBurney.

Dibb should be commended for a handsome production filmed briskly, and for providing Knightley with the attention and room to luxuriate in her role. He seems like, and it’s not a bad thing, a 1930s director fawning over his leading lady; Knightley repays his adoration by clearly reveling in the role.

But she has reached a turning point, where her talent is evident but doubt remains as to whether she‘ll succumb to typecasting.  She needs an edgy part, an earthy role, and a character like Jane Fonda’s in “Klute” would help prevent the prototype Knightley has had a tendency to resort to from becoming an unimaginative trend. However, if she chooses the safer path, a route where her talent is usurped by box office aspirations or, simply, lackadaisical choices, it may have a domino effect, and one day, not too distantly but regrettably, she could be seen hawking a best-selling, half-hour workout infomercial, “Pilates of the Caribbean.”


The Grocer’s Son

A Glass Half Full

September 16th, 2008

08grocerxlarge1
At some moment, on a shaded late summer afternoon or a still warm autumn early evening, as you’ve been splayed on a comfy outdoor chaise lounge, a friend has handed you a glass of wine, usually a white, like a pinot grigio, announced its brand and appellation, and you’ve taken a first sip, a simplistically satisfying swallow, and while you’ve told yourself to remember the name of the wine, you’ve forgotten halfway through the bottle.

“The Grocer’s Son” is that varietal of movie.

Antoine (Nicolas Cazale) is an aimless young man in his late 20s, flitting between stints waiting tables, living in a studio apartment the size of a meager dorm room, who seems to have run away from his provincial Provence upbringing rather than towards the allure of Paris.  He sports the former amateur boxer visage of a Dolce & Gabbana print model; it’s a face which could sell trousers, or remove them.  His father’s sudden illness brings the adrift Antoine back to the bucolic landscape of his childhood as he agrees to help the family grocery business by driving a delivery van into the villages.  Antoine invites a friend, an apartment-building neighbor, Claire (Clotilde Hesme), a 26-year-old prospective student to whom he is attracted, to come along.  While she is enamored with a trip to the country, Antoine, upon arrival, is instantly uneasy and prickly, his mother and an older brother the target of his mental pins and needles.  It’s not so much “Look Back in Anger” for Antoine as “Look Back in Utter Exasperation.“ 

Antoine and Claire drive through the winding roads of the valley, delivering eggs, peas, salami and all sorts of sundries to the mostly elderly denizens of the villages.  Luckily, “The Grocer’s Son” doesn’t oversell the villager’s folksiness. In particular, the roles of Mr. Clement (Paul Crauchet) and Lucienne (Liliane Rovere) are graced with touching, real moments. 

When his father (Daniel Duval) returns from the hospital, with his gouged road map of a mug replete with a pinched two-pack-a -day mouth and sideburns like a motorcycle kickstand, the story begins to illustrate the residue of his fully-formed scowl.  But the film doesn’t delve into these relationships with much depth, treating details like junk food so that the frustration fraught in these family dynamics is obtuse,  so you’re never entirely sure where Antoine’s disquiet comes from.  The brother, a not-so-recently separated salon owner with considerable emotional difficulties, is, in particular, an unformed role in need of more insight.

Clearly, “The Grocer’s Son” could be more demonstrative, more insistent. But director Eric Guirado still crafts a film which is well-paced, attractive and solidly pleasing despite skimming on the specifics.  And, to that, one can raise a glass of whatever it’s called.


Encounters At the End of the World

Sink into Bliss

September 8th, 2008

encounters
In the violently cold winter of November 1974, a thirty-two-year-old Werner Herzog, hearing of a close friend’s grievously serious illness in Paris, walked, with little more than a duffel bag, the 560 miles from Munich to The City of Lights, believing she would not succumb while he was on foot. Nineteen days into his journey, with 100 miles to go, he met a momentary twinge of doubt, as he recalled in “Of Walking in Ice,” the published diary of his trek. 

“All at once driving snow, lightning, thunder and storm, everything at once, directly overhead, so suddenly that I was unable to find refuge again and tried instead to let the mess pass over me, leaning against the wall of a house, half-way protected from the wind.  Immediately to my right at the corner of the house, a fanatical wolfhound stuck his head through the garden fence, baring his teeth at me. Within minutes a layer of water and snow was lying hand-deep on the street, and a truck splashed me with everything that was lying there.  Shortly afterwards, the sun came out for a few seconds, then a torrential rainfall.  I grappled forward from cover to cover.  At the village school in Savieres, I debated whether I should drive to Paris, seeing some sense in that.  But getting so far on foot and then driving?  Better to live out this senselessness, if that’s what this is, to the very end.”

Throughout his filmmaking career, there‘s been more than a smidge of the final sentence’s ethos in his work.  While almost every other director on the planet would take a more prudent approach, Herzog has sought out in many instances the most difficult, challenging, intrepid, and, one could argue, dangerously foolhardy ways to film his productions.  So staggering are the stories of what seems like senseless risk in the making of films such as “Aguirre, Wrath of God” and “Fitzcarraldo” that the tales have become legend, to such a degree that they almost overwhelm the finished product.  More recently, his highly lauded documentary, “Grizzly Man,” considered the very meaning of senselessness.
 
With “Encounters at the End of The World” Herzog travels to Antarctica, the most isolated spot on the planet, upon the invitation of the United States’ National Science Foundation, to explore life at the “very end.”  From the moment Herzog disembarks from the US Air Force cargo plane at McMurdo Station in the midst of the austral summer, he meets a wonderful collection of “professional dreamers.”  These contentedly itinerant — both professional scientists and those simply with advanced degrees or aspirations to work as cooks, drivers, and mechanics in a land where the compass is irrelevant — are bursting with stories, anecdotes stamped in their passports.

Among them is the driver of “Ivan the Terra Bus” — the hulking transport vehicle which ferries folks from the runway to McMurdo — who is a former banker from Colorado who joined the Peace Corps only to narrowly evade death by machete in Guatemala.  Douglas MacAyeal, a glaciologist who studies B-15, a glacier larger than Delaware and Rhode Island combined, describes with bedeviled awe the prospective journey of the glacier as it begins to break up, melt and move inexorably north.  There is the linguist tending to the greenhouse, William Jirsa, who has come to a continent with no indigenous human language.  While Herzog directs gentle ribbing in the linguist’s direction, he clearly has an affinity for these undoubtedly eccentric nomads as they speak of lives in Antarctica which seem to subscribe to the anonymous inscription etched into a wooden railing: “I Sink into Bliss.”  

Even as the film centers on these individual’s stories, Herzog does not overlook capturing the beauty of the barren and expansive landscape. It is a remarkable technical achievement, especially given that it was made with a mere crew of two; Herzog supervised the sound while cinematographer Peter Zeitlinger captured the pictures. “Encounters” is filled with panoramic helicopter shots of the towering glaciers, ethereal underwater scenes as divers float beneath a ceiling of ice and intimate images of Mt. Erebus, the continent’s most active volcano.  A particularly powerful sequence combines underwater photography with the “Underwater Recordings of Seal Calls,” a trippy musical sound from the cuddly pinnipeds which suggests the type of sonic experimentation that would have gotten Brian Eno kicked out of Roxy Music.  The film’s own soundtrack is dominated by appropriately atmospheric chorale music.

While the natural world obviously dominates as a visual backdrop, it is the part-time residents of McMurdo, whose wonder of Antarctica is immense, that interests Herzog as a filmmaker because, in part, you surmise, he has found a kindred mindset in their obsessive compulsiveness.  This obsession of Herzog the director with the extremes of human existence can be seen as merely the act of taking earnest devotion to the edge. So the utterly fascinating characters, who share Herzog’s enthusiasm for the outer limits, and seem perfectly suited to a Herzog tale, fictional or otherwise, continue to abound. A friend of Herzog’s, Samuel Bowser, is a biologist contemplating his last dive beneath the ice while later celebrating the discovery of three new species with a roof-top guitar jam.  Karen Joyce, a writer, recounts a three-day journey through South America riding on the back of a lorry, inside a sewer pipe, with only a porthole shaped view for the entire trip.  Clive Oppenheimer, a curly haired volcanologist draped in scarves who sports an uncanny resemblance to Tom Baker, enthuses with good-natured brio as he stands on the precipice of a highly active volcano.  University of Hawaii physicist Peter Gorham talks breathlessly about ANITA — the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna — which is the project he launches into space to study neutrinos, elementary particles so indescribably minuscule that trillions pass through the human body every second.

But amongst these hearty explorers of the wondrous margins of existence, Herzog demonstrates that he is a thoughtful soul as he exhibits genuine restraint while interviewing Libor Zicha, a soft-spoken mechanic with passive eyes, who has suffered unspoken tragedies.  When Zicha pauses before discussing his past in the Soviet Bloc, Herzog interrupts him and instead asks if he will remove the items from the meticulously packed 20-kilo bag that he always keeps at the ready.  The efficiency of his packing underscores a man in need of control amongst his wandering impulse, who seeks solace in an untethered life.

Yet despite the tremendous attention spent with these dreamers, it is almost disconcerting that the film’s most potent moment centers on the continent’s iconic residents.  From atop a bluff, the camera captures a phalanx of a dozen or so penguins scooching across a vast swath of land as they make their way to a body of water.  A few turn back and return to the colony; the others continue forward. But a lone penguin breaks from the pack, stops for a moment of contemplation, and then begins to move in the direction of the interior of the continent and certain death.  Later in the journey, scientists do not interfere with this lone penguin waddling into the abyss. So, he ambles along the ice, shuffling senselessly, to the very end.