Archive for November, 2008

 

Synecdoche, New York

Charles in Charge

November 29th, 2008

synecdocheposter1
“Synecdoche, New York” always promised to require resolute viewing.

The first film directed by Charlie Kaufman — the screenwriter of “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind,” “Confessions of a Dangerous Mind,” “Adaptation,” and “Being John Malkovich” — “Synecdoche” returns to his favored themes examining identity, fantasticism and circumvented concepts of time.  

The tale of Caden Cotard, a hypochondriac, depressive director at a modest theater company unfolds absorbingly in the beginning, ably buffered by a wonderful performance from Philip Seymour Hoffman, whose hangdog expression and neurotic befuddlement enhance the anxiety he feels for his impending, experimental production of “Death of a Salesman” and withering marriage to a world-famous artist, Adele Lack (Catherine Keener).  

The film, though, veers toward tedium as Caden is increasingly more bewildered and more desperate to find meaning and self awareness in his unsettled existence.  It becomes redundant once Caden wins a MacArthur Fellowship.  The grant funds his obsessive, quixotic quest to make a play about his own life. The division between his actual life and the staged production is removed as he purchases a cavernous theater, builds sets duplicating his homes, and imposes on an ever-increasing cast as the rehearsals pass from weeks to months to years.  A shade over two hours, “Synecdoche,” like those rehearsals, becomes wearing. Caden’s self-indulgence begins to feel like Kaufman‘s, or is it vice versa? The film could have been culled by a judicious thirty to forty minutes and would not have rid itself of the vital conundrums.

While the story spirals into tedious narcissism, the cast is phenomenal throughout.  Kaufman has gathered a stunning ensemble of actresses who serve as Caden’s inspirations, foils and loves, much like the feminine ensemble surrounding Marcello Mastroianni’s director in Fellini‘s “8 ½.”  Samantha Morton brings a warm, sassy confidence to Hazel, the box office ticket lady who becomes his muse.  Hope Davis is bespectacled, hair-in-a-bun fun as Caden‘s self-help psychiatrist.  Genuine and fetching, Michelle Williams provides a natural emotional quality as his second wife, actress Claire Keen, which suggest that she‘s on the verge of becoming one of America’s most important actors.  One looks forward to seeing her in the soon-to-be-released, tiny budgeted “Wendy and Lucy.”  Not for the first time this year, Keener seems too well-suited to play the disinterested, sarcastic wife and Jennifer Jason Leigh prowls the screen as her best friend. As actors in Caden’s cast, both Dianne Wiest and Emily Watson are enjoyable presences who could have been augmented with slightly more developed characters.  The performances are a welcome superlative in a promising film which becomes a bit of a slog.


JCVD

A Van Damme Good Movie

November 25th, 2008

jcvd
In the mid 1990s, I enjoyed a film-going guilty pleasure by the name of Jean-Claude Van Damme. 

Perhaps a tad burnt out by art-house pretensions like “La Belle noiseuse” and “Prospero’s Books,” I would plunk down on opening day with a decidedly Testosterone-fueled crowd — a motley crew of sleeveless Megadeth concert-Ts and “two dudes who always put a seat between themselves because they aren’t that way” dudes —  to catch the latest Van Damme flick, indulging in a heaping serving of better-get-your-popcorn pulp.  The training wheels of his early “Bloodsport” and “Kickboxer” vehicles had been discarded as Hollywood attempted to make a movie star out of a martial arts tactician.  “Hard Target” was John Woo’s first American film and he and Van Damme provided considerable thrills on a modest budget. “Timecop” was implausible fun with a sly Ron Silver performance while the dependably suspenseful “Sudden Death” made an NHL game relevant.  They were entertaining, if imperfectly so, but Van Damme‘s athleticism and proficient direction by Woo and Peter Hyams made them pleasing diversions.  Blessed with boyish charm, hunky good looks and an appealing Belgian French accent, Van Damme even earned a prominent role on a post-Super Bowl “Friends.”

But just as suddenly as he’d kick started a respectable box-office niche, his career quickly evaporated into straight-to-DVD fare and the ignominy of sharing the screen with Dennis Rodman. He faded into punch line status as he became more famous for boasting he could crack walnuts with his buttocks.

So, it‘s no joke, “JCVD” is a revelation.  Always fictional but steeped in the autobiographical, it’s a movie about Jean-Claude Van Damme, but this is no caricature nor overt parody but instead a contemplation.  It’s heartfelt, clever, and at times, even mesmerizing.  The Versailles-born French director Mabrouk El Mechri has made one hell of a movie. El Mechri and his cinematographer, Pierre-Yves Bastard, which sounds like the name of a disappointing Van Damme character, have draped the film in a sepia-toned documentary style with washed out, muted colors and a grainy patina. The strong visual is matched by a smart, predominantly French script from El Mechri and his co-writers, Frederic Benudis and Christophe Turpin, which utilizes the legend of Van Damme without condescension.

“JCVD” is buoyed by a crafty opening in which Van Damme charges punching, gouging and kicking with considerable brio through a scene in one of his typical, uninspired projects, until, at cut, he engages in a darkly comical exchange with a young, disinterested director clearly disdainful of the film as anything other than a springboard, the sequence climaxing with the set crashing to the ground behind the weary Van Damme. The fourth wall is removed; and while the film is not told in first person, it is intimate and direct.

Embroiled in a child custody tussle and frustrated with the pathetic routine of his acting choices, Van Damme returns to his hometown of Brussels for a respite.  Instantly recognized and adored by shop clerks and taxi drivers, he pays a fateful visit to a post office in the Schaerbeek community which devolves into a bank robbery with hostages.  Given his publicized court troubles and a sighting at a window, the police believe Van Damme is the crook.  And the three thieves are pleased to use Jean-Claude as their foil.  

But as engrossing as the film is, a powerful scene showcasing Van Damme is an epiphany.  Van Damme is sitting in a non-descript chair in a back room of the post office.  Slowly the chair rises with the camera shot, until there is all black behind him, framing his haggard face and broad shoulders.  Van Damme speaks squarely to the camera, about his tenuous career, his unsettled life, an insatiable desire for love, his adoration for women, and the torment of drugs.  It is a confessional without a request for mercy, or pity. He accepts that he yearned for the fame which supplied him with what he desires and what bedevils him. He speaks for minutes on end, captivatingly, soulfully, and with clarity and raw emotion.  The chair floats back to the post office floor.  And you try to catch your breath. It is the single strongest concentrated piece of acting I’ve seen this year. Clearly Van Damme’s finest moment on screen, it would buttress the resume of any noted film actor working today.  

We always thought the dexterity was in his hips as he swiveled his foot into a standing man’s chin, but, perhaps, nurtured by a sincere director such as the emerging El Mechri and proffered a role like Jean Reno’s in “The Professional” or Toshiro Mifune’s in “Yojimbo,” he can resurrect his career with characters which meld the physicality of the action star with an informed depth.

When placing his trust in a young director whose only other feature-length film was 2005’s little seen “Virgil,” Van Damme must have been fearful that a misstep in El Mechri’s approach could lead to a patronizing tone or, worse, a cartoonish, lampooned portrayal. But El Mechri has respectfully repaid the faith that  Jean-Claude entrusted in him by creating the most unexpected instant cult classic of 2008.


Quantum of Solace

Skanking, Not Stirred

November 21st, 2008

quantum_007
In 1965, saxophonist Rolando Alphonso, late of The Skatalites, rounded up several of his former bandmates in the recording den of Studio One in Kingston as The Soul Brothers to record their version of the “James Bond Theme.” Braced by Bryan Atkinson’s filthy bass, Lloyd Knibb’s whiplash drums and Lynn Taitt’s slinky guitar and accentuated with the steady piano beat of Jackie Mittoo and the infectious vocal percussion of ‘King Sporty,’ the song explodes with the brash, urgent, almost abrasive, horn section of Alphonso, ‘Dizzy’ Moore and Rupert Dillon.  The Soul Brothers pay homage to the brilliant, original tune while taking it from the quicksand of the bandstand to the sound systems of street level in the baddest cover of the tune to date.

Two years ago, a reverential Daniel Craig revived a turgid series as the retro Bond, and while he didn’t usurp the irreproducible Sean Connery, he brought back a wanton muskiness to the role that in comparison made Roger Moore harbor all the threat of Fred Grandy.  “Quantum of Solace” finds Craig even more menacing, chiseled and strapped.  It’s James Bond as Rude Boy.

Director Marc Forster matches Craig’s intensity with an earthy, gritty film which, befitting the shortest Bond film in history, spans three continents in a whirl of visceral action sequences interrupted with a modicum of extraneous dialogue and ludicrous gadgets.  Opening with a thrilling car chase through a central Italian quarry which leads into a thumpy little dirge of a theme song, and reemerging after the credits in a rapid-fire roof-top pursuit nicely juxtaposed with the Palio di Siena, “Quantum of Solace” from the offset mocks its title with an energetic, globe-trotting pace that is anything but soporific.

Quickly switching locales to Port-au-Prince, “Quantum”  unleashes fisticuffs evocative of the Bourne series, but that doesn’t make the sequences derivative, less thrilling or less astutely executed.  And the taint of Q couldn’t be further removed as instead of a yacht with a physics-defying propulsion system, Bond improvises on the Gulf of Gonave, jarringly maneuvering from power boated danger on a glorified, motorized dug out.

But the film doesn’t forsake the grand moments.  A superb set piece is fashioned during a modern adaptation of Tosca on the Seebuhne, the massive floating stage on Lake Constance in Bregenz, Austria.  Forster constructs a terrific juxtaposition between the escalating drama of the opera and the unfolding fortuitous discovery Bond makes in the 7,000 seat concert hall.  There is very little acute action in the scene, but through concise editing and clever sound technique, the tension is explicit. It’s exhilarating pomp amongst the happenstance.

Mathieu Amalric, whose expressive eyes were so integral to the compelling “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly,” plays villainous government puppeteer Dominic Greene, with understated menace, almost bemusement, in a performance reminiscent of Klaus Maria Brandauer’s in “Never Say Never Again.”

Judy Dench, a spunky, vital 73-years-old, has molded “M” into a formidable presence and has formed a complicated relationship with Bond which was lacking during the many years Bernard Lee claimed the role. While Dench is offered a part of ample opportunity, Jeffrey Wright, frustratingly one of America’s most underutilized acting talents, returns, slighted, as Felix Leiter, and while the character has always been an ancillary one in the series, the creative team should have expanded the role for his talent.  

Forster (“Monster’s Ball,” “Finding Neverland,” “Stranger than Fiction“) doesn‘t possess a resume which suggests a propensity to helm a venerable spy series, but he‘s an emboldened choice.  He ably meshes the action with a story of vengeance while adding an underpinning of pathos. In a nod to the Bond legacy, he even throws in a dark reference to “Goldfinger.“ 

Like Christopher Nolan earlier this year with “The Dark Knight,” Forster’s film works quite well in the quieter moments and more intimate battles but a few of the larger action sequences feel jumbled and disjointed.  An air battle is overlong and slightly cumbersome.  And the camera work by Roberto Schaefer — who has not only shot all of Forster’s films but is a frequent collaborator of Christopher Guest’s — is at times too tightly pressed up on the frenzy, and perhaps could have been improved by retreating from the action for a wider view.

But in an episode which highlights their success at capturing reflective moments, Forster and Schaefer present one of the more evocative sequences in the Bond canon.  As Bond and his comrade-in-harm, Camille (Olga Kurylenko), stride defiantly in the desolate Bolivian desert, the scene cuts to the townspeople of an impoverished village, who are clearly not professional actors, walking to wells run dry by Greene’s scheme, and then, for just a moment, the scene goes back to the grim pair in the desert before returning to the villagers staring at a spigot with just a single, mocking, lamentable drop falling into a bucket, the mesmerizing visuals bristling with the atmosphere of a party political broadcast from Evo Morales.

As the film concludes in Russia with a contemplation of the consequences of revenge, “Quantum of Solace” is a  film with no baccarat, nor Bacharach, nor excruciating banter, but instead is a testament to a franchise invigorated and a Bond with an attitude.


Happy-Go-Lucky

Life is Sweet

November 11th, 2008

happygo
Admittedly, I went to see “Happy-Go-Lucky” as a diversion on the early evening of the most anticipated election night.  

As the film begins, Pauline ‘Poppy’ Cross (Sally Hawkins), the embodiment of the title, is shown riding her bicycle, helmetless, along London streets from Granby Place to Finsbury Park with a sweetly goofy smile creasing her face, and it quickly became easier to forget politics.  

The present-day story is quite straight-forward and carries a familiar tone for a Mike Leigh film; It’s not a tumultuous time in Poppy’s life — we follow the 30-year-old as she bops along to work, cavorts at a flamenco dance class, learns to drive and latterly embarks on a relationship — but the film captures wonderfully how Poppy embraces the prosaic earnestly and fully.  She is a primary school teacher of a multicultural class of 7 and 8-year-olds who seems to relish cutting, painting and clucking around in a chicken mask as much, if not more so, as the children do.  For the best part of a decade, Poppy, who dresses in outfits pinched from Pat Benatar’s “Love is a Battlefield” video, has lived with her acerbic flat mate and fellow teacher, Zoe (Alexis Zegerman).  Together they enjoy nights out at the disco with the girls but they’re not a frivolous duo and while they’re both seeking substantial relationships, there’s no self pitying in their bemoaning the lack of prospects. 

As befitting a Mike Leigh film, the movie isn’t skewed to the sweet side completely.  With her bike stolen, which she accepts with a good natured shrug, Poppy decides to learn to drive and engages the services of an instructor. Initially Scott (Eddie Marsan) appears to be a stern tutor but as the weekly lessons continue, he becomes increasingly vitriolic, especially when he bemoans a nation he perceives as under threat from the melting pot; he doesn’t see it as half-empty or half-full but overflowing. But Poppy is no dupe.  She mocks him with snarky asides, her sense of humor hardly disguising her growing unease with his small-minded nastiness. Yet, she does want to understand where his frothing anger comes from, why his Britain is not her Britain, how he despises the beauty she sees so clearly in her classroom, and the final lesson between the two is kinetic without being overwrought. 

In films such as “Life is Sweet” and “Secrets & Lies,“ Leigh has tamped the quotidian lives of ordinary people to unearth splendid insights into the human condition. Leigh orchestrates one of these moments in “Happy-Go-Lucky” when Zoe, Poppy and her incorrigible youngest sister (Kate O’Flynn) visit their married middle sister, Helen, smugly ensconced in suburbia, with her overmatched husband, Jamie (Oliver Maltman). Pregnant and insecure, Helen (Caroline Martin) goads and chides Poppy about family, children and mortgages, remonstrating that her older sister  can‘t be as cheerful as she purports to be.  Poppy delivers a heartfelt and assured defense.  The tension is heightened above a simmer but doesn’t explode, so that like so many family moments, Helen slinks off to bed in a sulk, the remaining unease as uncomfortable as a pull-out sofa sleeper.  

With an actress of less acumen and poise, Poppy may have devolved quickly into an insipid caricature. Luckily, Hawkins plays the part with ample integrity and intellect. She dispatches naiveté as Poppy’s cheeky, fun-loving persona is grounded in a conscientious and sensible ethic. Vitally, “Happy-Go-Lucky” is centered around this performance of exquisite bravura. 

A curmudgeon could balk at Poppy’s sunny disposition, her indefatigable spirit could be dismissed as twee, and her irresistible optimism could be condemned as unrealistic and childish, but when the film was over, and I stepped outside the theater, and the world had won, and it seemed like every face was plastered with a sweetly goofy smile, it was as though a planetful of Poppy’s had sprung up, each giddy with a good natured last laugh for the cynics.