Archive for October, 2009

 

October 30th, 2009

The tireless Clint Eastwood returns in December with “Invictus,” which chronicles the five years from Nelson Mandela’s release from prison to his prominent role as President of South Africa to unify South Africa through the hosting of the 1995 Rugby World Cup. Morgan Freeman portrays Mandela and Matt Damon plays Francois Piennar, the victorious South African team captain.

Mark Macaskill of The Times discovers that “Robert Carlyle fans can buy a role in his new film.”

Viggo Mortensen, Charlize Theron, and Kodi Smit-McPhee appear in November in the film adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s “The Road,” directed by John Hillcoat, who helmed 2005’s vastly impressive “The Proposition.”

“Antichrist” star Charlotte Gainsbourg reveals to Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle that “on the balance, all the naked things and the sex scenes were nothing compared to the grieving scenes.”

One Film Wonder: In 1980, South African director Jamie Uys made “The Gods Must Be Crazy,” which centered on Xi, a Saho bushman in the Kalahari Desert, who discovers a soft drink bottle and embarks on a journey to discard it. As “The Gods Must Be Crazy” was financed with South African government funds at a time of an international embargo, the film was marketed as a Botswanan film. Describing the work as a “highly popular and distorted film,” Canadian anthropologist Richard Lee noted in his book “The Dobe, Ju/hoansi” that “The Gods Must Be Crazy” inaccurately “tried to portray the Ju/’hoansi as pristine hunter-gatherers ‘untouched’ by civilization.” The film became a world-wide sensation. In North America, interest began in midnight movie houses, with the movie earning expanding distribution in 1984 and grossing more than $30 million.

Xi was portrayed by N!xau, a San, one of the indigenous peoples living in the region classified presently as South Africa and Namibia. Born circa 1944, he was paid a reported few hundred dollars for his performance in the film. For the 1989 sequel, “The Gods Must Be Crazy II,” he negotiated a purported salary in the hundreds of thousands. N!xau appeared in only 4 other films, each one of them a sequel in the “The Gods Must Be Crazy” franchise; the last three, which were not directed by Uys, were set in Hong Kong and filmed in Cantonese. A herdsman, he returned to Tsumkwe in the Otjozondjua region of Namibia to live on his farm with his family. N!xau died in 2003.


9

Hard Times in an Age of Quarrel

October 30th, 2009

9-movie
In 2005, after four exhaustive years, graduate student Shane Acker completed his eleven-minute college thesis for UCLA’s Animation Workshop. Filmed without dialogue, “9” was the visually absorbing, computer-generated tale of a “stitchpunk” rag doll battling a mechanical beast in a post-apocalyptic world devoid of humans. Woven from hessian, with round, thick-lensed eyes like dilating apertures, the mute, nimble character of #9 outfoxed a metal, skeletoned cat-like contraption. Acker made, in a mere few minutes of screen time, a gripping and arresting movie. In the spring of 2006, “9” was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Animated Short Film. The winner that year was the wrenching “The Moon and the Son: An Imagined Conversation,” an autobiographical indictment of his own father by animator John Canemaker. Each of the films is a wonderful reminder of the power, diversity and talent illustrated in this regrettably underseen, compact form of filmmaking.

Tim Burton was enamored by the university project, brought in director Timur Bekmambetov, among others, as a fellow producer, and Acker embarked on a feature length edition. Sadly, the protracted version of “9″ gives the impression of a movie stretched by a thin, overly familiar narrative. The entirely new back story is recognizable: A well-meaning government scientist designs the Great Machine; the machine turns evil. Armageddon rages in a grainy newsreel montage. Afterwards, in this barren land, a small band of the numbered rag dolls remains, under constant attack from the spindly creatures devised by the machine. Led by a crotchety, de facto leader (the sonorous Christopher Plummer as #1), some are holed up, simply hiding out. A few intrepid stitchpunks embrace a more proactive approach to toppling their hunters; circumstance places #9 in the latter camp. Each of the rag dolls, as it is explained by the deceased scientist’s hologram, was created as components of his “soul.” But their individual personalities don’t resonate strongly in the 79-minute film. The script by Pamela Pettler — who wrote both Burton’s “The Corpse Bride” and Gil Kenan’s “Monster House” – fails to provide the “stitchpunks” with identities past a basic, surface level. The character of #9 is now voiced with earnest nativity by Elijah Wood as though the creatures wish to decimate his beloved shire.

The visuals remain engaging. Sunlight is shrouded by a sky suspended like a coal-choked tarp. The dolls huddle under a military helmet, scurrying cleverly for shelter in the rubble. Filmed from intriguing perspectives, a flexing feline beast peers menacingly for its quarry. Acker also has a skill for creating finely choreographed, atmospheric action sequences.

The newcomer lists the Brothers Quay and Jan Švankmajer as major influences. They are animators of unsettling, phantasmagoric stop-motion films. Detritus packs their miniature sets, and taxidermy and lifeless dolls permeate their work; there’s an air of pungent decay. They execute intricate guerilla filmmaking. Comparatively, Acker feels like the most reserved member of the Tim Burton Revolutionary Knitting Circle. While he resourcefully incorporates skeletons and inanimate objects into his mise-en-scène, and you definitely see the framework of his inspirational gurus, it doesn’t feel creepy. It’s orderly, not edgy. The Quays and Švankmajer flesh out nightmares; Acker specializes in dreams. (A sequence of resurrecting souls is lovingly realized.) He’s a recognizable talent with a recommendable feature-film debut. But, for his next project, hopefully Acker will unhinge his imagination in a plumper story.


October 23rd, 2009

Opening today in North America, “Ong Bak 2” is the latest extravaganza starring Thai martial arts actor Tony Jaa. Co-directed by Jaa and long-time Thai director and stunt coordinator Panna Rittikrai, the film was infamously embroiled in production disputes during its making.

Jim Schembri of The Age in Melbourne discovers that the Aboriginal-language drama “Samson and Delilah makes tilt at Oscar.”

Carla Gugino, Adrianne Palicki, and Connie Britton are amongst the extensive cast appearing in Sebastian Gutierrez’s “Women in Trouble,” which debuts on November 13th in the States.

Tim Robey of The Telegraph chronicles “Alfred Hitchcock’s Rebecca: rows, rivalries and a movie classic.”

One Film Wonder: A U.S. Army soldier from Battle Creek, Michigan, who assisted in the liberation of Italy during World War II, John Kitzmiller remained in the country after the war and started acting in Italian films. He appeared in 45 European movies during his career. Kitzmiller was bestowed with the Best Actor accolade at the 1957 Cannes Film Festival for his performance as Sgt. Jim in the Slovenian war film, “Valley of Peace.” He was the first black actor to receive the award. (Incidentally, Paul Newman would win it the next year for “The Long, Hot Summer,” Forest Whitaker in 1988 for “Bird.”)

Kitzmiller appeared in only two English-language films: 1958’s “The Naked Earth” and the first James Bond film, 1962’s “Dr. No.” Credited as John Kitzmuller, he portrayed Quarrel, the Cayman Islander fisherman and CIA associate who assists Bond in his investigation of Dr. No’s island, Crab Key. Kitzmiller died in Rome in 1965 at the age of 51.


Where the Wild Things Are

A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius

October 23rd, 2009

where_the_wild_things_are
Spike Jonze has made an unenviable adaptation a wonder.

In 1963’s “Where the Wild Things Are,” Maurice Sendak spun a concise and evocative tale of a young boy named Max immersed in make-believe with pictures reminiscent of a muted ukiyo-e woodblock print and verse like haiku. It was a brief, transcendent book, so dissimilar from many of the current voluminous kiddie tomes which read like the step outline for a film franchise; its brevity was a portal to the reader’s own fantasy world. With this reverent and innovative movie, Jonze and his fellow screenwriter, the sedulous author Dave Eggers, delve beyond the page by expounding on the original theme, no more than suggested by Sendak, of how children cope with and express unverbalized frustration through simultaneously reassuring and intense invention. “Where the Wild Things Are” probes outside the margins to create an emotionally rich and technically absorbing vision.

In Sendak’s primary version, a mischievous Max is sent to bed without any supper, and as he pouts in his room, he sets sail in a self-inscribed boat. Jonze places modern-day Max (Max Records) in a wintry locale where a kid can build an igloo of which he’s most proud. The igloo is also a sanctuary, like his imagination. Astutely, Jonze, in a few taut scenes, details the 9-year-old boy’s disquiet. The structure is smashed by his teenaged sister’s roughhousing friends in a boisterous snowball fight started by Max. He feels a keen sense of abandonment when his older sibling drives off with her pals. The young lad becomes more agitated that evening as his divorced mother (Catherine Keener) entertains her new, serious boyfriend (Mark Ruffalo, in a wisp of a cameo). Increasingly petulant and attention seeking, he bites his mom on the arm. Max, wrapped in a whiskered cat suit, runs from the house, into the woods, and begins his fantastical journey to the fabricated island where the wild things live.

The mythical beasts in the book are anonymous hybrids with “terrible roars,” “teeth,” “eyes,” and “claws.” Here, they physically resemble Sendak’s illustrations and are showcased in a combination of costumed puppeteers and animatronics devised by Jim Henson’s Creature Shop. This melding of techniques is generally undetectable so that live action meshes seamlessly with the CGI. But, unlike the source, the movie’s chimeric creatures are given names and seven distinct psyches. Their personalities wouldn’t be out of place in a saturnine (albeit furrier) Ingmar Bergman flick. It’s a grown-up septet with formidable ensemble voiceover work. The allegorical wild things are introduced in thick woods as the lovelorn Carol, the most demonstratively tortured, as soulfully spoken by James Gandolfini, squashes their huts with manic delirium. Chris Cooper is Douglas, the mediating chicken. Judith and Ira are the perfectly suited mismatched couple; Judith (a biting Catherine O’Hara) is the provocateur of the bunch, while Ira (a kindly Forest Whitaker) is an affable get-along sort. The diffident Alexander, who looks like Seth Green trapped in a billy goat’s body, is rendered with tremulous melancholy by Paul Dano (“Little Miss Sunshine.”) The most reticent member of the group is The Bull (voiced, rarely, by Michael Berry Jr.). And the independent KW (Lauren Ambrose, “Six Feet Under”) is Carol’s love interest who pines to leave the forest with new-found friends, a pair of owls named Bob and Terry, whose presence unnerves her former beau. Through his own cunning, Max is quickly made king of this complex collection.

In Sendak’s original, Max and the wild things engage in a wild rumpus, and in Jonze’s film there’s playful bounding and a group hug which makes a mountain out of a troll hill. But there’s also the construction of an intricate fort and a hearty dirt-clod fight to underscore the rivalries and vulnerabilities. Each event is mired in psychological reverberations, especially when Max picks the teams and reveals his favorites during the dirty battle. It also shows how often children’s games hinge on violence; the undercurrent of malice in a dirt-clod fight, dodge ball clash, snowball skirmish or Red Rover tussle can so easily be exposed in one well-aimed instant. The aftermath of the game, though, generates a genuine moment of reflection between a wounded Alexander and Max. The music by Karen O, lead singer of Yeah Yeah Yeahs, and Carter Burwell, a frequent composer for the Coen brothers’ films, is a constant compliment to the myriad moods, especially captured in the deeply felt, lyrical lullaby “Hideaway.”

A storied picture book has come to life in a wise, ambitious and thought-provoking movie. Seven years since his last film, and with full artistic control over this project, Jonze, you’d imagine, is presenting “Where the Wild Things Are” as he dreamed it.


October 16th, 2009

Starring Michelle Monaghan, “Trucker,” the debut feature film from James Mottern, opens this month.

From the Reykjavik International Film Festival, Gerald Peary of The Boston Phoenix recently reported “back from Iceland amidst lamb hot dogs, and fish and chips.”

Wes Anderson’s “Fantastic Mr. Fox” appears in November.

Kevin Smith tells Jay Richardson of The Scotsman: “I’m the Forrest Gump of film.”

One Film Wonder: During 30 years and 4,531 “Tonight Show” broadcasts, the suave and sardonic Johnny Carson interviewed thousands of movie stars. He appeared in only one film, 1964’s “Looking for Love.” The musical romp starred Connie Francis and Jim Hutton, Timothy’s dad. When Carson left show business in 1992, he began the smoothest retirement in entertainment history.


Couples Retreat & The Invention of Lying

The Last Resort

October 16th, 2009

the-invention-of-lying
Thirteen years ago, when Vince Vaughn was all Adam’s apple and venomous verbal rattle, Trent, his hipster persona in “Swingers,” delivered a cautionary warning to his buddy and fellow fledgling actor, Mike, played by Jon Favreau.

“I don’t want you to be the guy in the PG-13 movie everyone’s really hoping makes it happen. I want you to be like the guy in the rated R movie, you know, the guy you’re not sure whether or not you like yet. You’re not sure where he’s coming from. Okay? You’re a bad man. You’re a bad man, Mikey. You’re a bad man, bad man.”

Reunited for the fourth time on screen since the iconic “Swingers,” they’ve descended with “Couples Retreat” into the sort of lazy, fatuous PG-13 movie Trent exhorted against. For most of this decade, it’s been a steady regression by Vaughn into a typecast mold of a snarky, lethargic caricature of his seminal “Swingers” role. Vaughn has settled into an onscreen deportment reminiscent of the average Joe on a Monday night CBS sitcom. Even when the movies are decent, you’re still left wondering where the exuberant presence went. Favreau, who is a much more interesting director (“Elf,” “Iron Man”) than actor, has morphed since his “Dinner for Five” phase into a physique resembling Kimbo Slice. It’s the duo of MIA and MMA — they used to be money; now they’re just getting paid.

Opening with a lively title sequence from Jarik Van Sluijs, with Bowie’s “Modern Love” bopping along to short bursts of old home movies and archival B-movie footage, this soft lob for the common megaplex quickly succumbs to a tepid script written by Vaughn, Favreau and Dana Fox. It’s a treatment so banal and humorless it’s conceivable it was thought up and scribbled down during a solitary weekend retreat. (Favreau, who wrote “Swingers,” should be particularly shamed.)

The strained, basic story is that an anal-retentive husband and wife on the verge of divorce (Jason Bateman and Kristen Bell) cajole three other couples in Buffalo to vacation at an exotic resort specializing in reinvigorating relationships. In a confounding scene, Bateman’s character, named Jason, snoops around Dave’s (Vaughn) house at midnight, tossing pebbles at the second-story bedroom window. Dave reaches into his nightstand, retrieves a handgun, loads a clip into it, and steps gingerly down his stairs, until Jason sets off the house alarm by opening an unlocked sliding door. Dave has his gun drawn on his friend Jason, and then the light comes on. Silly and hopelessly clichéd, but disconcerting and certainly never examined for all of its implications. The scene pointedly underscores how the film teeters unsteadily from attempts at comedy to poorly broaching subjects such as friendship and intimacy. The movie also doesn’t begin to explain how four couples from Buffalo – with barely seven day’s notice in the middle of winter — secure a week-long vacation in the South Pacific that was not a traditional holiday week. Without any intervening exposition, the couples are shown inexplicably docking at a pristine mountainous island, which is actually Bora Bora. “Welcome to Eden,” the staff heralds to the couples, and it appears to be a salutation which greeted the cast and crew as well. But don’t worry about continuity; it’s not long before we have the beauty described with a “screensaver” joke. “Couples Retreat” is hackneyed, disjointed storytelling in an ignominious feature film debut from director Peter Billingsley (Ralphie from “A Christmas Story.”).

The slyly witty Peter Serafinowicz plays the manager of the resort as Christopher Lee as Mr. Roarke, (It would have been fun to see his character enhanced; “Scaramanga, will you do the fandango?”) His biting delivery is undercut with a scene which unnecessarily ruptures logic. Three of the four couples are anticipating a week of frivolity but their plans are replaced with a rigorous schedule of counseling sessions and day-break exercise classes devised by the resort’s founder (the utterly professional Jean Reno). But why are they handed their itinerary booklets at dinner? Wouldn’t it have been simpler and more practical to have this document placed on the living room tables in their palatial rooms?

Despite a few decent lines, the movie’s main characters are unlikable, unformed or boring. Favreau and Kristin Davis are especially unappealing as the disconnected couple who have raised a teenaged daughter, blown off a marriage, and spend the trip on the make for younger, more desirable partners. A sequence where each is finagling for a more erotic massage in adjoining rooms is predictable and feeble. Malin Akerman plays the sitcom worthy role of hot wife to Vaughn’s regular dude. It was a stretch to call the limber Silk Spectre in “Watchmen” an actress; here, she recites every line with the emphasis of a kindergarten teacher. The rest of the cast don’t resonate, generally because there’s no real connection between the characters and the humor is perfunctory.

But “Couples Retreat” is graced by one genuine comic superlative. Every appearance by Salvadore, the amorous, good-natured yoga instructor, is hilarious. A Puerto Rican soap opera star and best-selling musician, Carlos Ponce is perhaps most recognizable for a season-long role on the WB’s “7th Heaven.” But this will become his signature role with a highlight reel of physical comedy. Salvadore struts with a mischievous grin in a Speedo hugging his chiseled body and dramatically flicks his stringy Romance novel cover boy hair. He wraps his frame around the stretched and posed bodies, both male and female, willfully dry humping his class. Ponce is an ebullient scene stealer before he’s even uttered a word; his cheeky smile a rare exhibition of merriment in the film.

Sadly, Salvadore is a supporting character so he surfaces only occasionally, while Vaughn predominates, never more frustratingly than in an overly-long boat sequence with a stupid shark attack in the island’s lagoon. The torpid scene seems stretched out merely so that Vaughn can spout like Vaughn, but he’s just a seashell of himself so it’s hollow, brusque and just bad, man. It may not be a low-water mark, but it begs the question, “How low can you go?”

For Ricky Gervais, the opposite may be true. With two smart, mature, and funny films in quick succession, he’s positioned himself as one of the leading practitioners of clever, adult comedy. After his tremendous portrayals in “The Office” and “Extras,” you wouldn’t have been surprised if he’d transferred his mordant comedic sensibility to his movies. However he’s developed a knack for noticeably lighter and fundamentally entertaining works which are still substantial. In David Koepp’s “Ghost Town,” he helps foment a 1950s throwback flair with Tea Leoni and Greg Kinnear. Directed and written by Gervais and Matthew Robinson, “The Invention of Lying” is similarly suffused with intellect, wit and belly laughs as one humble man inadvertently discovers dishonesty. Set in a modern-day community redolent with the ambiance of a New England college town, it’s a world where fibs don’t exist and deceit is unfathomable. There’s no feigning platitudes or insincerity. Unfettered by decorum, co-workers, waiters and even passersby spout out exactly what’s on their mind. Every conversation is brutally frank, making truth the world’s oldest confession.

Gervais stars as Mark Bellison a screenwriter for Lecture Films, a company specializing in the exposition of history; but not as re-enactments. Instead, in a world devoid of imagination, a camera simply films authoritative narrators such as Nathan Goldfrappe (a splendid Christopher Guest) sitting in chairs reciting bland copy. Lecture writers are designated centuries; the smug, sartorial Brad Kessler (a sneering Rob Lowe) has the 20th. Mark is lumbered with the 14th century; the Black Plague features prominently in his works.

Entirely by accident, and known only to him, the recently fired writer utters the first ever lie, to a bank teller. Initially, Mark’s skill is utilized in the most rudimentary of pursuits: money and women. But he seems more than enthralled by the prospect of his power than actually fulfilling his wishes, except when it comes to his unrequited love (a first-rate portrayal by Jennifer Garner). When he invents the afterlife in an attempt to calm his mother’s fears – and Gervais delivers a deeply moving performance in a genuinely touching scene — he’s overheard and his concept of heaven propagates. Acolytes camp out in front of his modest apartment building, quietly waiting for more information. Reluctantly, Mark delivers a tale to a world-wide audience which is an unmalicious satire of Christianity. As he divulges more edicts with the help of a facetious visual gag, the inquisitive gathering clamors for more details about everlasting eternity; there’s a succor borne every minute. “The Invention of Lying” is filled with the satiric underpinnings and dexterity of an Ealing comedy but not the full bloodedness. Both “The Invention of Lying” and “Couples Retreat” have happy endings. But only Gervais, in a bright and jocular film, has taken the care to earn it.


October 9th, 2009

The majestic and too-often ill-fated filmmaker Terry Gilliam presents “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” at the end of the year.

In his discussion of Jon Blair’s’ Brazilian documentary “Dancing with the Devil,” Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian sees “Olympian dreams and favela realities collide in Rio de Janeiro.”

Michael Kimmelman of The New York Times details how “A New Film Focuses France on the ‘Disgrace’ of Its Overcrowded Prisons.” Directed by Jacques Audiard, “A Prophet” arrives in North America in December.

Sebastian Gutierrez, whose “Women in Trouble” starring Carla Gugino and Joseph Gordon-Levitt opens in November, recently shared his “Top Five Films” with Film School Rejects, noting, “These Are My Top 5 Today. Ask me tomorrow, and the list would surely have Blue Velvet, Buñuel and something with Marcello Mastroianni in it.”

One Film Wonder: Eva Le Gallienne was an esteemed theater director, producer and actress, first appearing on the London stage in 1914 and lastly on Broadway in 1981. In between, she founded the Civic Repertory Theatre in the 1920s and the American Repertory Theater in the 1940sr .She appeared in only three films, including “Prince of Players” in 1955 and “The Devil’s Disciple” in 1959. For her third, “Resurrection,” which co-starred Ellen Burstyn, Sam Shepard and Richard Farnsworth, she was nominated in the spring of 1981 for a Best Supporting Actress Academy Award for her portrayal of Grandma Pearl. At the time, Le Gallienne was the oldest nominee in Oscar history.


The Informant!

Sex, Lysine, and Audiotape

October 9th, 2009

info
Marketed with Matt Damon’s exultant, gawping grin jutting from the promotional posters and an exclamation point thrust into the title as befitting a suburban superhero, “The Informant!,” is muckier than its advertising insinuates. By the time the aftermath has settled in this incredulous tale of corn espionage – based on Kurt Eichenwald’s nonfiction expose of the highest ranking corporate whistleblower in U.S. history – Steven Soderbergh has concocted an adroit film with an absorbing slurry of poignancy mixed with the hilarity.

A biochemist by education, Mark Whitacre (Damon) is an emerging executive with agricultural conglomerate Archer Daniels Midland in the fall of 1992. Though he’s mounted the upper echelon of capitalism by his early thirties, in the dull mega-business culture of the bland leading the bland, he’s an unexceptional Midwesterner. With 30 doughy pounds added to Damon’s physique, he walks with an awkward, overcompensating bound. Mark’s suits are tailor made, but apparently not for him, and he wears ties the pattern of a Golden Girl’s blouse; he’s also the type of fellow who keeps his tie tucked under his shoulder harness while he’s driving. His thatch of sandy-blond hair is the consistency of trimmed wheatgrass and his shadowy moustache curls around the edge of his upper lip and droops over the corners of his mouth, just a few forgetful mornings from emerging as a porn stache. There’s an undertone of stiffness in his interaction with co-workers; it’s as though Mark, an academic posing as one of the boys, is continually afraid he’ll be called out for a clumsy golf swing. As a composite, he possesses the genial disposition of Ned Flanders and the stilted countenance of Eddie Murphy’s Mr. White.

When the FBI investigates a groundless blackmailing scheme at the company, Mark is befriended by Special Agent Brian Shepard (Scott Bakula, looking decidedly Vulcan), and spurred by his wife, Ginger (Melanie Lynskey), to reveal the existence of an international price fixing scheme. Rimmed by unremarkable eyewear, Mark’s eyes wildly flicker as he goes undercover; the corporate manager agrees to be fitted with a wire, obviously enamored with the spy’s life. He globe trots from Tokyo to Zurich to Hawaii, as his deepening surveillance draws out the machinations of the sodium gluconate and lysine cost-controlling cabal.

Damon has emerged as one of the most versatile American actors; he’s comfortable in marquee-topping blockbusters, and tiny indie projects (“Gerry,” “The Brothers Grimm”). He also possesses a fine comic sensibility (“Stuck on You,” “I’m Fucking Matt Damon”). Plainly not shy about discarding his glamorous persona to play Whitacre, Damon mines Mark’s bumbling naivety for laughs. But he’s resolutely adept so that the portrayal doesn’t dissolve into buffoonery despite his character’s healthy dollop of doofus. Damon manages to depict Mark, who is clearly ego boosted by his role as a secret agent, as a well-intentioned goofus without making him derisory, even when the young executive can’t help himself, almost inconceivably, while in crowded boardrooms, from peering unsurreptitiously into lamps fixed with cameras, and fidgeting matter-of-factly with his whirring briefcase recording device.

The seamless direction (Soderbergh also served as the movie’s cinematographer under the pseudonym Peter Andrews) keeps the film skimming as the investigation intensifies. When the offices raids and indictments come down in 1995 – and, ultimately, ADM paid out hundreds of millions in fines and court settlements – Mark remains oblivious, even as his own life becomes more turbid. Almost willfully denying the urgency of his legal and career troubles, Mark boasts and implores in the same breath to his attorney (played by a strong Tony Hale) that “We built the investigation,” the Walter Mitty-like tipster overstating his relationship with the FBI, a team he was never fully a part of and never completely truthful with. Damon is potently effective during the subsequent unraveling.

Soderbergh cleverly accentuates the rueful comic ambience by casting countless comedians in dramatic roles. More than a dozen stand-up comics, writers and improv performers provide strong, decisive portrayals; no punch lines, just impeccable timing. Tom Papa and Rick Overton loom as insufferable ADM honchos, Joel McHale is thoughtfully empathic as Shepard’s partner while Paul F. Tompkins and Patton Oswalt are stolidly stern government investigators. Even the Smothers Brothers are gifted small parts; Tom returns to films after a 20-year absence, Dick makes his first in a decade.

While the Smothers Brothers appear in rare cameos, the assiduous and preeminent Soderbergh has culminated a busy twelve months during which he’s released four distinct films — the two tonally-distinct chapters of “Che” (long but deeply gratifying), “The Girlfriend Experience” (slight but intriguing), and, presently, “The Informant!,” a husky, multilayered and artfully compounded seriocomedy.


October 2nd, 2009

Penelope Cruz returns in November to North American screens in Pedro Almodovar’s “Broken Embraces.”

Tim Murphy of New York Magazine finds “Precious” star Gabby Sidibe “living the life.”

Lars von Trier — the vuvuzela of world cinema — arrives stateside later this month with the graphic and divisive “Antichrist.”

The Vancouver Sun’s Randy Shore asks, “Did you hear the one about the first nations’ comedy?”

One Film Wonder: Barbara Loden was a celebrated stage actress who only appeared in three films, most notably as Ginny Stamper, the older, promiscuous sister of Warren Beatty’s Bud in 1961’s “Splendor in the Grass, directed by her future husband, Elia Kazan, whom she married in 1968. She won the Tony for Best Performance by a Featured Actress in 1964 for her portrayal of Maggie in Arthur Miller’s “After the Fall.”

In 1970, Loden wrote and directed “Wanda,” her only feature-film work behind the camera, and starred in the title role. In his March 1971 review, The New York Times’ Roger Greenspun remarked that “Loden’s film, by the time you are through with it, has, rather surprisingly, some of the look of classical moviemaking.” Thirty-five years later, Dave Kehr in the same paper lauded the film a “masterpiece” which

“had the bad luck to be doubly ahead of its time. Politically, it was guilty of premature post-feminism. The story about a youngish housewife (played by Ms. Loden) from Pennsylvania coal mining country who walks away from her husband and two children to take up with a mean-spirited petty thief (Michael Higgins) is hardly a parade of positive role models. And formally, the film — shot in 16-millimeter by Nicholas Proferes, using the lightweight equipment that was then driving the cinéma vérité documentary movement — goes far beyond the jittery, performance-centered style associated with that era’s independent films, like John Cassavetes’s 1968 “Faces.”

Barbara Loden died of breast cancer in 1980 at the age of 48.


The Hurt Locker

Full Metal Flak Jacket

October 2nd, 2009

hurt
Since 1982, Kathryn Bigelow has amassed, upon reflection, one of the more intriguing resumes of the past thirty years. Until this year, in a decidedly mercurial body of work, she had directed seven distinct movies which followed no formula and were beholden to no genre; there is a discernible sense that she thrives on never repeating herself. She directed Willem Dafoe that year in his first credited film role in “The Loveless,” an homage to “The Wild One.” Five years later, she created the 1987 vampire flick “Near Dark,” a movie whose reputation only grows with time. At the end of the ‘80s, she filmed the Jamie Lee Curtis cop thriller “Blue Steel,” and followed it with 1991’s quotable cult classic, “Point Break,” and a personal late-night cable favorite, 1995’s Ralph Fiennes-Angela Bassett noir, “Strange Days.” In 2000, Sean Penn starred in the poorly received “The Weight of Water,” while in 2002, she made “K-19: The Widowmaker,” a critically well-regarded Harrison Ford flick set on a Soviet submarine which snared a mere 35 million dollars at the box office. Seven films over 20 years and each marked with an asterisk, most described with the caveat of guilty pleasure. In the summer of 2007, Bigelow transported an estimable crew and a cast of relative unknowns to Amman, Jordan, and, for the reported pittance of 11 million dollars, filmed her eighth feature-length film, “The Hurt Locker,” which chronicles the final month of deployment in Iraq for a U.S. Army bomb squad in 2004. For this film, no qualifier is necessary: “The Hurt Locker” is an unequivocally tremendous and authoritative achievement. It is the seminal work of her career.

Girded by seven painstaking sequences with each focusing vividly on a day in the field, “The Hurt Locker” is a film set during wartime but not reliant on action scenes blazing; it’s not classically heroic either. Raw, real, and suffocating, the seven lengthy and deliberate scenes are brilliantly executed gripping pillars of a movie entrenched in the working lives of soldiers who attempt to disarm bombs and improvised explosive devices. Bigelow sets this intensive, concentrated tone from the first moments of the film in a powerful opening chapter. Sergeant Matt Thompson (the chameleonic Guy Pearce) ploddingly walks in his protective suit like a moon-landed Apollo astronaut toward a bomb nestled in a deserted Baghdad street. Keeping watch with eyes darting from doorways to rooftops are the sensible Sergeant JT Sanborn (the dependably strong Anthony Mackie of “Half Nelson”) and the emotionally susceptible Specialist Owen Eldridge (an effective Brian Geraghty). The scene unfolds methodically, like the deep inhales and exhales from inside Thompson’s mask, and the stillness is disquieting and deceptive.

With 38 days left in their rotation, the explosive ordinance disposal team is joined by a new leader, Staff Sergeant William James (a swaggering Jeremy Renner), a brash veteran of 837 bomb detonations who is equally reckless and fastidious. Relatively young despite his experience, James is a hot-wired, fractious presence. (He cranks up Ministry to unwind.) There’s a healthy element of a character study in the script by Mark Boal, (who also penned the story which became the movie, “In the Valley of Elah,”), and the film delves into how the disparate personalities of the team coalesce, but, basically, it’s a story of daily vulnerability as the trio sets out alone in their armored vehicle to defuse the innumerable IEDs. Ever-present danger is the normality. Robots fixed with cameras glide around the bombs, but the devices require a human touch to silence them. In one instance, the team must decipher a pentagon of serpentine wires running from an IED dug into the city street to an apartment building; on another assignment, as circumspect stares bear down from urban rooftops, Sanborn and Eldridge, with guns drawn, scan for snipers as James attempts to dismantle a bomb lodged intricately inside a car. The camera work in these scenes by cinematographer Barry Ackroyd is superb. Ackroyd has filmed the vast majority of Ken Loach’s canon as well as Paul Greengrass’ “United 93,” and he excels at capturing images with a claustrophobic lens. From Glaswegian alleyways to London bed-sits or the cabin of a Boeing 757, and, now, a decimated Iraq, his camera provides a stark, palatable, unnerving intimacy. Ackroyd’s camera has never been afraid to expose the wrenching quotidian; “The Hurt Locker” doesn’t shy away either.

The film leaves Baghdad for an assignment in the desert where the team comes to the unintended assistance of a band of hired civilians led by “Contractor Team Leader” (a ruddy Ralph Fiennes). A firefight erupts. Amongst the mayhem, the scene illustrates jarringly beautiful cinematic shots of empty cartridges bouncing off the ground, and a fly daintily resting on an eyelash. The lengthy battle-field engagement highlights the judicious work of editors Bob Murawski, a veteran of Sam Raimi’s films, and Chris Innis, who expertly mesh the violence into the agonizingly protracted stand-off.

A tangential scene in which a vengeful Staff Sergeant James sneaks off the base for a planned act of retribution is the only hurried sequence in the film, and, consequently, the weakest. It’s unconvincing because it’s too quick and too brusque; the other emotionally charged moments develop and envelop with patient buildup, but this scene just flashes by. It also illustrates a flaw in the balance of the characters. While “The Hurt Locker” follows the three soldiers, the film tips its interest too heavily to the plight of Sergeant James. The movie shows scenes of his home life, and his paternal interaction with a cheeky, football-playing Iraqi kid who calls himself Beckham. It’s useful to the character’s edification but the two other team members could have profited from the same level of contextual perspective. The vulnerable Eldridge is fleshed out in a few illuminating scenes with an Army psychiatrist, Colonel John Cambridge (Christian Camargo), but very little is unearthed about his background. And Sanborn is underwritten, with bits of his life tossed out almost as asides. Especially when portrayed by an actor as stout as Mackie, who will become a more heralded movie presence in the next few years, it should be considered a missed opportunity.

But the final major sequence in Baghdad underscores the tenacious filmmaking exerted by Bigelow. An Iraqi man, an innocent pawn, with a time bomb clamped to his torso by a metal vest of chain and locks like an illusionist’s final harrowing escape, stands pleading in a vacant square. The team arrives at the military checkpoint and the emotion of the scene escalates as the helplessness the man and the American soldiers feel turns to anguish. Bigelow remains unrelenting to the end, with no respite from the tension, and no conclusion to a story where, in 2004, a soldier re-upped for war and misery in perpetuity.