Archive for November, 2009

 

November 20th, 2009

Colin Firth stars as “A Single Man” in Tom Ford’s first film which opens next month. The cast includes Julianne Moore, Matthew Goode and Nicholas Hoult.

Bill Nighy reveals to Patrick Barkham of The Guardian that “I am not suddenly the greatest actor in the world.”

Willem Dafoe, Chloë Sevigny, Brad Dourif and Michael Shannon appear in Werner Herzog’s “My Son, My Son, What Have Ye Done.” Inspired by a true crime event, the film reaches theaters in North America beginning next month.

Min Lee of The Associate Press writes about Lou Ye and his latest film, “Spring Fever” as “Banned director brings romance film to Hong Kong.” Strand Releasing will present the film in the United States.

One Film Wonder: The exceedingly influential French director Jean Vigo had a brief film career totaling only four projects. He directed his first short film, “À propos de Nice” at the age of 25 in 1930. The following year he shot an experimental film recording the movements of French swimming sensation Jean Taris in the water. In 1933, he made “Zero for Conduct,” a 41-minute boarding school drama. The next year, he released his only feature-length film, “L’Atalante,” the cinematically important tale of a jealous canal barge captain and his new bride. (The film’s cinematographer was Boris Kaufman, who twenty years later would begin a Hollywood career which included filming “On the Waterfront,” “12 Angry Men,” and “The Pawnbroker.”) In October 1934, a month after the release of “L’Atalante,” Vigo died, aged 29, of complications from tuberculosis. Both France and Spain bestow annual directing awards in his name. In France, the Prix Jean Vigo has been given to directors such as Alain Resnais, Jean-Luc Godard and Olivier Assayas.


Nothing But a Man & Putney Swope

Indivisible Man

November 20th, 2009

SF31813
Portland, Oregon hosted an inaugural African American Film Festival this past weekend. Founded by Ron Craig – who also coordinates the Astoria International Film Festival – the PDX AAFF movies were divided into four categories: social contemporary (“Carmen Jones,” “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”); classic films (“Imitation of Life,” “Cabin in the Sky”); progressive films (“Jo Jo Dancer, Your Life is Calling,” “She’s Gotta Have It”) and blaxploitation (“Shaft,” “Superfly,” and “Cleopatra Jones”). I saw two films during the festival — 1964’s incisive “Nothing But a Man” and 1969’s farcical “Putney Swope” — which afforded me a rare opportunity to see works from beyond the fringe which are generally regarded as seminal.

In Michael Roemer’s remarkable “Nothing But a Man,” Ivan Dixon plays Duff Anderson, a railroad worker in a 1960s small Alabama town not far from Birmingham, who grapples with his inner struggle of confronting the barrage of racial prejudice he faces without destroying his own soul. He shares cramped, temporary accommodations with half a dozen of his fellow “section gang” — including Yaphet Kotto in his first film role — in a threadbare bunkhouse. They pass the time playing checkers on a broken-in-two board with bottle caps for pieces. Seemingly older than his mid-20s, Duff is reserved and mostly keeps to himself and Dixon provides the role with a charismatic presence of simmering intensity suggesting pain concealed just below the surface but easily rubbed raw. The film gives him ample instances to excel in a part reportedly first offered to Dixon’s close friend, Sidney Poitier.

One evening, after downing a beer at a working class pool parlor, Duff visits a church where the choir exclaims, “Take My Hand, Precious Lord.” Duff meets Josie, a 26-year-old school teacher who returned to the town after attending college in Birmingham; she’s also the Reverend’s daughter. Blessed with a soft voice and furtive eyes, Abbey Lincoln invests Josie with a resolve which belies her timid demeanor. (Revered to this day as a jazz singer, this was Lincoln’s first film role in a career of just a few scant appearances.) Duff stays for the church supper but not for the service, as he leaves with the trilling of the guest preacher warbling into the street.

On their first date, Duff and Josie visit a lively dance hall. Little Stevie Wonder is blaring on the sound system. (The Motown songs supplement the harmonica soundtrack by Wilbur Kirk throughout the film. And this is an authentic Motown soundtrack. The story of how Roemer discovered the music of the burgeoning record company that he used in this film is found here). Duff is circumspect early in the evening, wondering why Josie is “slumming” with a railroad worker. ”What are you doing with a cat like me in a joint like this?” Duff asks directly. Josie is intrigued by Duff’s bluntness. When they drive to a secluded location to talk further, they are taunted by two white men in their later teens who menacingly lean against the passenger side, calling Duff “boy.” Sitting at the wheel of his borrowed car, Duff challenges the young men to stop their taunts. They recognize Josie as the preacher’s daughter and move on, but not without some last, lewd comments. “They don’t sound human, do they?” Duff asks rhetorically. (The scene vividly encapsulates the hint of violence underpinning these exchanges but more specifically the complete racial contempt and derision the young men feel no compunction to hide.) As they drive afterwards to her home, Josie recalls a lynching eight years before in the town. “My father knew who did it but he didn’t say anything,” she says matter-of-factly, allowing her father’s complicity to speak for itself. Duff, essentially, proposes to Josie at the end of the date.

As a first date, it’s remarkably frank and forthright. The astute script by Robert M. Young (who was also the film’s cinematographer) and Roemer elicits candor without staginess. Characters speak with a stark openness. The conversations – from intense arguments to casual banter – throughout the movie are transfused with insight and illumination; this is a film which does not countenance bullshit. “Nothing But a Man” is about how a black man deals with the indignities of racial prejudice, but it’s perhaps more interested in the internal impact than the external racial confrontations. The story concentrates on how the treatment Duff suffers from translates to his attitude towards his relationships and to himself. As the film adds more scenarios, Duff is challenged to examine and determine his moral fate not just distinctly as a black man but as a man.

Intrigued with each other, a romance begins between Duff and Josie. He reveals that he is an Army veteran, once stationed in Japan, who, after returning, went up North, but found that “it ain’t that good up there, either.” (But as forthright as Duff appears, he still fails to tell Josie until they are quite serious about the 4 year-old son he has from a relationship long ended.) Roemer astutely captures the social distinctions of this small, Southern town when Duff goes to Josie’s house and shakes the hand of the Reverend but when he’s introduced to the white superintendent of schools who calls him “boy”, neither extends a hand. “You’ve got to go easy,” the superintendent reminds the young man. But Duff doesn’t tolerate appeasement without equality. He and the Reverend engage in pointed rows about black acquiescence. The Reverend, who remains silent as murderers walk free, dislikes Duff doubly: for his views but, perhaps more importantly, his vocation. Not overly political, Duff is addressing the topic of how a black man in 1960s America should be treated as a fundamental question of existence. For Duff, it’s a matter of human rights, not just civil rights.

When Duff ventures to Birmingham, a series of sad, unsettling scenes marks his return. He visits his son in a derelict apartment. The child’s mother has abandoned him with an unconcerned babysitter, but, at that moment, all Duff does is drop some bills on a table so the babysitter can care for the toddler. During the same trip, Duff seeks out his dad, Will, (Julius Harris in the first film role of a lengthy career) a despicable, angry alcoholic. Duff is not there to confront his father but simply to observe. Roemer crafts a strong scene at a local bar as Duff and his dad’s girlfriend, Lee (Gloria Foster, the acclaimed stage actress who played The Oracle in “The Matrix.”), dance closely to Martha and the Vandellas’ “Heatwave,” under Will’s watchful eye. There’s a palpable edginess to this moment. It’s not a sexual tension between Duff and Lee, but a connection more like a kinship with both of them suffering from such a tortured, hostile man.

Once Duff and Josie marry, he quits the railroad for a clocking-in job. This brings him closer to the racism, white compliance and black capitulation he so despises. After he tells his plant co-workers at lunch that they should stick together, he’s ratted out and fired. He takes a job at a gas station where almost every tank is overflowing with the open hostility of customers. But even sympathy can feel emasculating to Duff. “I don’t like to be mothered,” he spits out when Josie tries to comfort him after he loses another job. You hope he doesn’t inherit his father’s ability to wallow in anger. Will he allow the degradation imposed on him by others to rupture his goodness? As he is wracked with an inner life in turmoil, it makes you ponder, “Which cheek do you turn when both have been slapped?” It is in those moments that one wonders if they have the strength and resolve to be defiant against the dehumanization without gnashed teeth and clenched fists.

Unfortunately, “Nothing But a Man” was not a watershed moment for many of the principals. The following year, Dixon would begin a five-year stint on “Hogan’s Heroes” as Sergeant James Kinchkoe, the bilingual communications specialist, before becoming a busy TV director. Young has worked infrequently as a writer, cinematographer and director. Roemer would direct “The Plot Against Harry” in 1969 and then embark on a career in academia at Yale University, where he still teaches film studies.

It’s patronizing at times to suggest that it’s important to see a movie for its historical significance because it tends to imply that the film has very little merit otherwise. But the historical importance of “Nothing But a Man” is simply only one of a number of compelling reasons the film is laudable. Audiences in 1964 should have seen this movie for its unblinkered storytelling and truthful approach to complex relationships; in the subsequent forty-five years it has lost none of its relevance and resonance for contemporary viewers. Profound and personal, it is one of the most sincere American films of this or any year.

putney
An unapologetic and cavalier satire, Robert Downey Sr.’s “Putney Swope” isn’t subtle. After haranguing the executive board of his underperforming New York City ad agency, the cantankerous owner topples over dead onto the massive wooden board-room table. As the lifeless body lies on the table like a stiff on a mortuary slab, his successor is tallied from scraps of paper pulled out of the dead man’s hat. Due to infighting on the board, they unexpectedly choose the only black member of the executive board, Putney Swope, the agency’s musical director. Gravelly voiced, Putney (Arnold Johnson) fires almost everyone immediately. “Rocking the boat is a drag,” he insists. “You sink it.” He re-names the agency Truth and Soul. Putney is a contradictory boss — he bans accounts for companies making war toys yet his assistant openly totes a gun.

The commercials created by his new firm are artistic, convincing and even entrancing—and highly successful for the reconfigured business. In stark contrast to the black and white of the film, the ads are filmed in soothing color: A trippy, space themed spot for Lucky Airlines showcases slow-motion cavorting; a romantic, interracial couple tenderly sing a hilarious tune for the pimple remover, Faceoff; a breakfast food called Ethereal Cereal is sold with in-your-face efficacy; and a lone dancer in a smoke-filled alleyway performs a funky, undulating dance for Fan-A-Way. “You can’t eat an air conditioner,” coos the sultry model.

Downey dresses Swope in an evolving set of outfits, from his original business suit to sporting a beret with black mock turtleneck, to finally parading around the office in a Fidel Castro-like get-up. But this revolutionary angle isn’t examined too closely. (The hallways are bursting with groupies and supplicants; the abiding philosophy appears to be “Puff, Puff, Pass.”) The film falters because Johnson is not a compelling presence. Purportedly, Downey dubbed all of Johnson’s dialogue because the actor either forgot his lines, or simply mangled them. (The irony of a film about an all-white ad agency taken over by a black man, who then is dubbed by a white man can be construed as something more than just a side note.)

Beleaguered by its protagonist’s performance, “Putney Swope” has no cohesive vision. Executives line up to curry favor with Swope but corporate greed seems an all-too-obvious target. As the office becomes more chaotic and anarchic (which is quite a different thing than revolutionary) and Putney becomes more dictatorial, a subplot involving an imaginary United States president only serves as a distraction. “Putney Swope” is a concept in search of a payoff. It’s a mere 84 minutes but still feels long. In the end, the millions he’s made are sabotaged. As Putney’s pyre burns, you wonder if he shouldn’t have been tearing the roof off the sucker.


November 13th, 2009

Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster star as conflicted soldiers in “The Messenger,” the first feature film from “I’m Not There” co-writer Oren Moverman. Opening today, the film’s cast also includes Samantha Morton and Jena Malone.

In a sweeping interview, Robin Wright tells Christine Lennon of the Sunday Independent that “Change is always hard.”

Chronicling John Lennon’s adolescent years, “Nowhere Boy” is the debut film from artist Sam Taylor Wood starring Aaron Johnson as the future Beatle. Anne-Marie Duff plays John’s mother, Julia, while Kristin Scott Thomas appears as his Aunt Mimi. The film will be released in the States by The Weinstein Company but a specific date has not been announced.

Indiewire’s Peter Knegt presents “For Your Consideration: The 50 Most Despicable Oscar Snubs of the 2000s.”

One Film Wonder: Playwright and author Tom Stoppard has written 35 scripts for television and films, along with penning more than 20 plays. He’s directed only one movie, 1990’s “Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead.” Adapted from his seminal 1966 absurdist play, the film version stars Gary Oldman and Tim Roth deliciously chewing the scenery as Hamlet’s fringe characters expounded.


Mary and Max & Ponyo

Pen Pals Mesmerize in Hand Made Tale, Prodigy Returns With Fish Out of Water

November 13th, 2009

mary-and-max
Molded in clay but as brittle as bone china, Mary and Max are the fragile souls explored in Adam Elliot’s heart-rending yet hilarious stop-motion tour de force. Based on the true story of the 20-year correspondence between vulnerable pen pals, “Mary and Max” is lavished with exquisite, earthy detail and gives us two of the most richly realized and captivating characters presented in film this year. Elliot won the Best Animated Short Film Oscar for 2003s “Harvie Krumpet,” a 22-minute cavalcade of a long-suffering life. With this self described “clayography,” the Australian animator has added more than an hour to his storytelling but lost none of his emotional immediacy and comic esprit.

Mary Daisy Dinkle is a stumpy, bespectacled 8-year-old from Spotswood, a suburb of Melbourne. As noted in the flowery, funny script narrated superbly by Barry Humphries, Mary “has eyes the colour of muddy puddles and a birthmark the colour of poo.” Her father, Noel, works at a teabag factory, and retreats nightly to the backyard shed where he practices taxidermy on roadkill. Vera, her mother, is a sherry sloshing, anesthetized kleptomaniac who listens to the cricket, mindlessly avoiding the sticky wickets. Mary finds solace watching her favorite animated television show, “The Noblets,” while sitting on the settee with her pet rooster; Ethel, and supping on condensed milk. No pocket change to spare, she resourcefully makes her own Noblet toys with bits and bobs.

One day, in 1976, as her mother connives to filch from the local post office, Mary plops her finger on a random name in a New York City phone book and scribbles down the address. She sends a letter filled with the impertinent, inquiring questions only a child can ask without malice. Mary packs the envelope with her favorite sweets. The letter arrives at the dingy apartment of Max Jerry Horowitz, a 44-year-old overeating, depressive recluse with ears like skeleton keys. (This New York is blanched in the black and white of the Dead End Kids; conversely, Australia is filmed in the color of butterscotch.) Diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome, he shares his cramped quarters with a one-eyed cat named Hal, a parakeet called Mister Biscuit and an imaginary companion who goes by the name of Mr. Ravioli who hunches on a stool in a corner reading self-help books. Max gorges on a steady diet of chocolate hotdogs. Without a family of his own, Max accepts the unaccustomed role of surrogate uncle, regaling Mary with the stories of his marvelous and mad life, and unmaliciously answering questions he normally didn’t contemplate; where do babies really come from? Voiced with pitch-perfect weary recitation by Philip Seymour Hoffman, Max is a Crumb character, with a morsel of magnanimity.

The technical achievement showcased in “Mary and Max” is tremendous. The film’s production notes detail how the crew of fifty spent fifty-seven weeks creating 132,480 individual frames. They built 212 puppets and painstakingly made 808 Earl Grey teabags; they also used twelve liters of water-based sex lube for all of the water features, including tears and a river. Elliot and his crew construct Mary and Max’s specific worlds meticulously; the density of effort displayed by the wrinkles in the wallpaper.

As the pen pals trade letters through the years, the story hardens and intensifies. Voiced by a strong Toni Collette once she’s a teen, Mary graduates from college, marries and embarks on a career as an author, with distressing consequences. Fundamentally morose and always anxious, Max becomes more troubled amidst his stream of consciousness laden by personal religious and social upheaval. Trembling, he replaces Mr. Ravioli on the stool. Extremely humorous yet strangulatingly sad, “Mary and Max,” like a chocolate hotdog, is bittersweet.

Over the past dozen years, anime legend Hayao Miyazaki has created a succession of vigorous and luminous animated films. “Princess Mononoke” hurtles along like Akira Kurosawa’s “The Hidden Fortress.” The Oscar winning “Spirited Away” is a stirring fairy tale, while “Howl’s Moving Castle” is an inventive kaleidoscope. Immensely epic, complex and bold, these magical works are filled consistently with spectacular images and Shakespearean-styled characters. By comparison, his latest film, “Ponyo,” the quaint tale of a precocious goldfish with human aspirations, appears slight. It possesses the lightest tone of the four most recent Miyazaki feature films released in North America. And while it may not have been crafted specifically for tykes, it’s the first of the four to garner a G rating. This isn’t in itself a condemnation, but “Ponyo” is appreciably less visceral than its PG-rated predecessors.

After a sumptuous, wordless introduction to a teeming underwater life, the film moves above surface when the wayward goldfish is discovered by Sosuke, a 5-year-old boy who lives in a seaside village. Ponyo’s distraught dad, Fujimoto — a former human who disavowed humanity for his elaborate subaquatic sanctuary, and who looks, disconcertingly, like present-day Barry Manilow – searches for his daughter. Fujimoto’s motivation for finding her seems more skewed to the impact her human transformation will have on the world if she completes her metamorphosis than for the safety of his daughter. (Strange by a long way and voiced by a perturbed Liam Neeson, he’s a dad who always seems to be taking his work home with him.)

The sequences in the sea are wonderful. And Miyazaki crafts a fabulous set piece where hurtling tsunami-like waves, made of giant fish under Fujimoto’s spell, swirl around the village as though on a Formula 1 circuit while Ponyo, the red-headed scamp, sprints across the heads of the massive fish. The scene is bolstered by the rousing orchestration from longtime collaborator Joe Hisaishi.

But the narrative on land feels underwhelming, even when the village is flooded by the aftermath of the diluvian deluge. Miyazaki returns to his common themes of the battle between nature and humans, and continues his use of empowered female leads, but the story lacks the depth and the characters lack the intricacy of his previous efforts. Sosuke’s mom, Lisa (voiced by Tina Fey), who works at a local nursing home, is an indistinguished characterization, and his father, Koichi (Matt Damon), is a boat pilot too rarely incorporated into the plot. (There is a nifty sequence where the father and son communicate by lighted Morse code with Sosuke flickering messages from the balcony of their hilltop home while Koichi returns signals from the bridge of his boat.) The supporting parts, such as the half-dozen residents of the nursing home, are perfunctory. When the goddess of the sea and Ponyo’s mother, Gran Mamare (an ethereal beauty voiced by Cate Blanchett) appears, she hovers tranquilly, a soothing presence with hair shimmering like a shampoo commercial. Miyazaki’s previous films were a tapestry. “Ponyo” is a comforter.


November 6th, 2009

From Belgian directors Stéphane Aubier and Vincent Patar, “A Town called Panic” opens in the States in December.

Chatting to Andy Bichlbaum of The Yes Men, Dan Lybarger
of Cineaste discovers “How a Video Programmer Became an Activist and Filmmaker.”

Andrea Arnold directs Katie Jarvis and Michael Fassbender (who is enjoying an exceptional 2009) in “Fish Tank.” The sophomore effort from the director of “Red Road” debuts in North America in January.

J. Hoberman of the Village Voice writes about the “First Lady of Film Alice Guy Blanché.”

One Film Wonder: In his autobiography, Wilt Chamberlain boasted he slept with 20,000 women. Hollywood was less accommodating; he appeared in only one motion picture. Ten years after his retirement from professional basketball, Chamberlain starred as a sidekick to Arnold Schwarzenegger in 1984’s “Conan the Destroyer.” In the sequel to “Conan the Barbarian,” he portrayed Bombaata, Conan’s double-crossing adversary. Chamberlain, who died in 1999, remains the leading rebounder in NBA history and is the fourth leading scorer.


Paris

Land of a Thousand Dances

November 6th, 2009

paris1
I can be forgiven for anticipating that the latest film from Cédric Klapisch – simply titled “Paris” — would be just a picturesque postcard to the French capital with little to say. Previously, in “The Spanish Apartment,” he told the trifling story of a graduate student’s amorous exchange year in Spain. (When the soundtrack and editing are the two most overpowering artistic impressions, it generally does not bode well for the narrative, and the conclusion to the 2002 release was more foisted than justified.) It was a slideshow of a pretty picture that could have been called “Barcelona.” But with this new movie, Klapisch proficiently juggles a captivating multi-arced story with the contemplative viewpoint of an ailing central character as the jumping off spot. The subplots of numerous city dwellers — some who are very close to the protagonist, most only tangentially connected, at best – are told chiefly with depth, grace and illumination. This time, in “Paris,” the camera is more than a view finder scanning a beautiful, bustling city.

Pierre (Klapisch regular Romain Duris) is a professional dancer in his early 30s who learns he has a serious heart condition and is confined to his modest bachelor pad by the illness as he waits for a transplant. He rests his arms on the balcony railing of his Montmartre apartment, no less than five stories high, and gazes plaintively and admiringly upon the streets fanning out like spokes on a wheel. His older sister, Élise (Juliette Binoche), moves into his small space with her three pre-teen children, to care for Pierre. Élise visits the local outdoor market on a daily basis, getting to know the vendors of the fruit and vegetable stalls, incrementally. (In compelling scenes taking place without Élise, Klapisch, who also wrote the script, keenly reveals the hearty and sometimes thorny after-hours social interaction of these four men and the saucy, beguiling ex-wife of one of the merchants. An early-morning sequence later in the film set in a massive wholesalers’ warehouse is flirtatious and bittersweet.)

Earlier this year, Binoche appeared as the transatlantic travelling sister in Olivier Assayas’ “Summer Hours,” a drama which hinted at more than truly explored the dynamics of mortality weighing upon an affluent family. With Élise, Binoche is provided with a more complete, understandable character as she deals with a myriad of recognizable challenges: caring for the brother she dearly loves; striving for honesty with her children; coping with her job as a social worker; and facing her own romantic vulnerability caused by an ex’s betrayal. It’s a refined, robust performance from Binoche.

From his perch, Pierre sees a radiant young woman, Laetitia (Mélanie Laurent from “Inglourious Basterds”), who lives in a building cater-cornered from his, walking along the street with a carefree, sensuous gait which denotes the freedom he is denied. (Duris is a striking actor and he perceptively captures Pierre’s regularly simultaneous feelings of wonder and wistfulness). Laetitia is a student in a Parisian history class taught by a middle-aged professor named Roland Verneuil (Fabrice Luchini, “Intimate Strangers”). Priggish and bitter, Roland bristles about irksome colleagues and initially derides a TV producer’s overtures to host a program. However, money and vanity sway him. He becomes a television academician appearing in “It was here”-style documentaries, where he recites lectures as he strolls through palatial landmarks while live, costumed historical figures loll about in the background.

Back in his classroom, during a student’s dull presentation, Roland is fixated by Laetitia, and she stirs a dormant poetic fancy, first expressed, cheekily, through text. A fling commences. The curmudgeon vanquished, Roland is rejuvenated; he has the giddy air of Michael Caine’s Elliot in “Hannah and Her Sisters” when he burst “I’m walking on air.” In an uproarious scene at his home, an unrestrained Roland dances in front of Laetitia to a thumping Wilson Pickett tune; he’s in rhythm but out of control. Roland bops with complex, unselfconscious gyrations like an intoxicated Charlie Brown cartoon kid. The invigorated teacher becomes unrecognizable to his younger, architect brother (François Cluzet, “Tell No One”). Luchini handles Roland’s transition wonderfully, his impish eyes twinkling with delight. Laetitia, who has a leather jacketed boyfriend with the sexy ugly allure of Javier Bardem’s younger brother, is merely bemused.

Dancing features in a lovely, sensual and poignant sequence for Pierre. At a crowded, lively party thrown together at his place by Élise, he is joined on the makeshift dance floor by two fellow dance company members performing sultry, precisely choreographed moves to a hypnotic beat. Duris exhibits a sinewy flow to his body, and his face simmers with joy in a clearly ecstatic moment. Intimately photographed by Christophe Beaucame, the camera discovers Pierre gingerly sitting at the end of a couch catching his breath; the hips of others still sway to the music as again, Pierre, sadly, is demoted to the role of spectator.

The film builds upon these scenes, so that the characters’ actions, attitudes and decisions – whether the journey to peace of mind, or the courage to trust in a relationship, or the acceptance that an affair has ended — seem grounded in genuine development. (The least fleshed out episode is the cursory and, ironically, the most attractively shot story which follows the quest of a Cameroonian relative of one of Élise’s clients to reach Paris through perilous travel from Africa.) Unlike “The Spanish Apartment,” this movie earns an affinity for the characters. When the film ends, it’s not a conclusion. “Paris” feels like a terminus a quo.