Archive for the ‘Reviews F-J’ Category

 

The Great Buck Howard

What the World Needs Now

April 9th, 2009

howardbuck
The illusionist Buck Howard, played with relish by John Malkovich and inspired by The Amazing Kreskin, scaled to the summit of his career during the age when ventriloquists and plate spinners had a prominent place on prime-time television. In the 1970s, talk shows were still synonymous with variety shows and the last vestiges of vaudeville and cabaret found a spot on the bill. Presently, he boasts loudly that he was a guest 61 times on “The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson,” eager to add that he never graced the telecast when the inferior Jay Leno hosted; the irascible Buck, who won’t deign to call himself a “magician,” conveniently conceals that his last appearance on Carson’s couch was a decade before Jay debuted.

In this winning comedy from director and screenwriter Sean McGinly, Buck once again undertakes his mammoth, perpetual touring schedule into the overlooked markets in the unburnished venues where the entertainment of Ed Sullivan and Dinah Shore telecasts still captivates. In a one-man show he performs sleight of hand illusions, group hypnosis and even a lounge act interlude with piano key tinkling while sing whispering Jackie De Shannon’s classic, “What the World Needs Now.” To each audience, even in the most modest of theaters in the most drab of burgs, he gushes, “I love this town.”

Malkovich inhabits the character with great physical zeal with moppish hair, Allen Ludden’s sports coat collection, and enthusiastic, rotator cuff dislocating handshakes. Genial to his fans, his offstage viper delivery underscores a sneery, leery sensibility and a constant befuddlement with modern entertainment tastes. Like his turn in “Burn After Reading” there’s always the hint of menace in Malkovich’s comic characterizations.

Into this seeming time warp enters Troy Gable (Colin Hanks), a young man fleeing mid-semester from law school who answers a print ad and, as someone who’s just absconded from the future his father so carefully planned for him, readily takes up the challenge to circumnavigate the country serving as Buck’s personal assistant. Instead of a predictable generation gap tussle arising between the two, Troy quietly observes the prickly, particular eccentricity of the late middle aged performer on the road.

They are joined by a strong collective of supporting actors with Ricky Jay as Buck’s empathic manager, Emily Blunt as a bemused public relations hack, Griffin Dunne as a curious television star and Steve Zahn as an overzealous, sycophantic fan; no one plays the friendly doofus with as much earnest sincerity as Zahn. Tom Hanks, who served as a producer on the film, fumes, coincidentally, as Troy’s father. The likable and well-cast Colin Hanks comes in a clear second though to his Pops in their on-screen debates.

McGinly keeps “The Great Buck Howard” ticking along with the breezy, finger-snapping tempo of a variety show as an extraordinary stunt catapults Buck back into mainstream consciousness. The film mines several hysterical moments from awkward television appearances with Regis, Kelly, Conan and Jon Stewart. The new found fame leads the itinerant performer to a permanent room in Vegas. But Buck quickly finds that his magical inspiration doesn’t work in Vegas. (Not necessarily such a bad thing.)

But then something quite endearing happens. Buck returns to his exhaustive touring of the hinterlands, Troy leaves Buck’s employ to become a writer, and the irony evaporates. Buck truly appreciates his audience. He doesn’t begrudge or loathe them. They adore him and he reciprocates the ardor. When Troy comes back as an audience member, he finds himself engrossed by Buck’s performance, and rooting for the curmudgeon in a vulnerable career moment. There’s a sweetness to these final scenes; it’s a robust reminder that talent is nestled even in the chintzy, that there’s skill in the schmaltz, and being sappy isn’t necessarily the same thing as being a sap.

Despite a marquee name as a producer and performer, a cast of household faves and a charming story, “The Great Buck Howard” has opened in minuscule fashion, playing to at most 64 theaters during its three weeks in release, with only a modest number to be added in the next month or so. It seems that the film will vanish without much notice; it will be one of the more wistful disappearing acts this year.


Gomorra

Dolce & Camorra

February 26th, 2009

gomorra2
Diego Maradona, the coked up little genius of world football, was an artisan and a renegade and nowhere did his penchant for sporting sublimity and personal self destruction flourish more than in Napoli. The scruffy, diminutive El Pibe de Oro (the Golden Child) won a World Cup for Argentina in 1986 but the next year he accomplished something even more transcendent for his club side, SSC Napoli, by winning if not single handedly then with singular indefatigability the 1987 Serie A title. It was the first championship ever won by a southern Italian team after almost a century of competition, an historic moment with ramifications more far-reaching than the confines of a football pitch. The tifosi adore the skewed virtuoso with the low center of gravity and a high tolerance for the bacchanal even though he left the club, disgraced, in 1991.

Reports propagate that Maradona enjoyed a cozy relationship with the Camorra, the mafia of Napoli. As Richard Williams of The Guardian noted earlier this decade, “Maradona’s nocturnal adventures inevitably drew him into a demi-monde of intrigue and clan warfare.” In his 1996 book “The Camorra,” Tom Behan underscored this intimate connection the footballer shared with the city’s organized crime syndicate. “Furthermore, there is considerable circumstantial evidence to link Maradona to the Camorra: he was photographed socializing with some of the Guiliano brothers on more than one occasion, he had relationships with women closely linked to Camorra clans, and developed a cocaine habit which eventually led to his rapid departure form Naples as a result of a ban on playing and the obligation to face a trial.”

“Gomorra” is the film about those who couldn’t scurry off. Based on the 2006 non-fiction exposé of Napoli’s organized crime clans by Roberto Saviano — a book whose publication meant that the author reportedly never slept in the same bed two nights running until deciding to emigrate late last year to avoid the constant threat of retaliatory assassination — “Gomorra” is grim, violent, visceral, fascinating, unnerving and unrelenting. Ensnared and centered in derelict apartment blocks stacked like LEGO on crank in the Scampia quarter of Napoli, it’s a stark and brutal panorama from director Matteo Garrone of lives locked in mortar and moral squalor.

It is filmed through a macro lens, with an unnerving claustrophobic view. This tiny prism is tight on the foreground, blurring the background out of focus, and so close that only a part of a person is visible. There‘s very little visual perspective, and the foreboding sense of danger this creates is palpable and redoubtable. Characters are captive. But so is the audience. Opening with a tanning salon massacre, “Gomorra” announces itself in a close-cropped hail of gunfire, the blue-lit beds transformed into blood-stained coffins. The camera work by Marco Onorato is raw but not jutting about in the all-too-familiar hand-held staccato.

As the movie embeds itself into five intertwining and engrossing stories juggled beautifully by Garrone and editor Marco Spoletini, the tension only intensifies. Toto (Salvatore Abruzzese) is just entering his teenage years and recruits himself into the underworld. Sporting an England No. 7 sleeveless jersey, rings on almost every finger and plucked eyebrows, he endures an initiation both terrifying and uncomplicated in its warped crystalline concept of machismo.

The corruption of the waste disposal industry is unearthed by the travels of Franco (Toni Servillo), a snake smooth Camorra broker, and his fledgling protégé Roberto (Carmine Paternoster). Criss-crossing the country securing contracts doesn‘t leave much time for them, or the film, to sight-see., Even a Venice gondola ride is shot so tightly that we watch the wonder in Roberto‘s eyes but see very little of the sights.

Pasquale (Salvatore Cantalupo) is an earnest, kindly and respected dressmaker who perilously befriends a factory of Chinese immigrants by tutoring them at night, for a fee, on sewing techniques while his own boss is financed by the mob. His arc provides the film with its most altruistic moments — sitting on the edge of his bed regaling his sleeping wife and child about the sumptuous bass dinner cooked by his hosts or the car rides to the factory where he is tucked into the trunk for his protection and pokes his head through a hole in the backseat platform to chat — but even these are cloaked in danger and threat.

Don Ciro (Gianfelice Imparato), the middle-aged bag man, is a beaten down money carrier who’s face is plastered with a Buster Keaton melancholy. His plight only becomes more precarious as shifting clan dynamics alter his existence from protected foot soldier to vulnerable pawn.

And finally, two stupid ass punks by the names of Marco (Marco Macor) and Ciro (Ciro Petrone) smashing through the film quoting Tony Montana, stealing coke from Nigerian dealers, pilfering ammo from mob bosses, letting loose cannons on the briny shore, signing their death warrants with chicken scratch stunts. But “Gomorra” isn’t a film which lets you off the hook by telegraphing who survives and who gets snuffed. Everyone’s in the scope. The fact that Marco and Ciro each have a bullet with their name on it from their first steps on screen doesn’t mean there aren’t enough cartridges to go round.

Classic crime films such as the brilliant “Goodfellas” and “City of God” are phenomenal entertainment but they are filled with reassuring qualities. But “Gomorra” is bleak. It’s the mafia film redacted, stripped of the soothing effusions and familiar tropes; there is no guiding, helpful voiceover, no death rattle soliloquies, no cop from the neighborhood, no intrepid photographer, no sagely pontificator, no soundtrack to bop along to, and no body making it out of the neighborhood.

And there’s no code, either. Revenge is sought but splayed, directed in a spiral. A scene at the morgue where Toto and the older young men in his clan plot retribution underscores that they don‘t know who ordered the hit on their compadre. Yet they feel compelled to react, mercilessly. But there’s no color coded visual to distinguish friend from foe, no venerated and feared families, no regard for territory. It’s a horizontal hierarchy, not vertical, so it’s all happening at ground level. Nihilism can be born in those with no future, but what if a community populated by Toto’s has no past, just a cycle of living in a regurgitated present. “Gomorra” ends with a dump truck and corpses, a confluence of murder and waste disposal, in a present untended by a God, forsaken by man, with no hero, not even a footballing deity, in view.

(Previously released in New York and Los Angeles in January, “Gomorra” screened at the Portland International Film Festival earlier this month. It opens February 27th in Portland with an anticipated wider national release planned for the coming months.)


I’ve Loved You So Long & Rachel Getting Married

Sister Act

January 14th, 2009

il-y-a-longtemps-que-je-t-aime“I’ve Loved You So Long” unfolds patiently but not sluggishly as the textured tale of Juliette Fontaine (Kristin Scott Thomas), an intensely private and haunted woman reuniting with the world after her release from a fifteen year prison sentence for killing her own son.

Juliette moves in with the family of her younger sister, Lea (Elsa Zylberstein), who desperately wishes to reconnect with her phlegmatic sibling. As she enters the home Lea shares in Nancy, France with her husband Luc (Serge Hazanavicius), two adopted young children and a mute father-in-law, only Lea and Luc are privy in their circle to not only the fact that Juliette was incarcerated but that the crime was infanticide. The film by Philippe Claudel is parceled out intelligently and gracefully; inside the home it’s expressed through the sisters’ hesitant reunion, their emerging yet tentative relationship after 15 years adrift, the contradictorily understandable and irrational reservations of Lea’s husband, Luc, and the natural curiosity of an inquisitive 8-year-old niece. Outside the home, it’s reflected by Juliette’s hampered job prospects, the melancholy of a plaintively loquacious parole officer, a tipsy crepes-in-the-country dinner party, a visit to their mother suffering from Alzheimer’s and a burgeoning, tentative romance with a professorial colleague of Lea‘s. Bit by bit, these moments gradually reveal not only a sense of the secretive Juliette but the well-developed supporting characters as well until the film explodes in the sincere, honest and tragic revelation shared between the sisters.

With lines rigidly creased between her brows, a pinched smoker’s mouth, and an ashen translucence to her pallor, Scott Thomas physically inhabits Juliette. But it’s a performance more laudable for what lies beneath the mask as this is an assured, unaffected rendering permeated by expert emotional nuance. Her talent is prodigiously bilingual; she’s getting so many good, strong roles in the French language, I’m not sure we’ll hear her in English anytime soon. As the devoted younger sister, Zylberstein gives a performance of terrific striations, straining between her desire to repair wounds with her sister by providing a salve to her psyche while balancing the concerns of her husband and the welfare of her children.

Life is terminal, like a slowly encroaching sunset shadow with a sickle, and can be so cruel that we wonder whether the wonderful moments make up for the tragic, and with this foreboding sense Juliette is hounded by a guilt more incarcerating than any penal system, more strident than any rule of law, and more permanent than any criminal record. Still, despite the onus of despair, the sisters share a moment of self atonement in the film‘s final life-affirming moments, and in this culmination “I’ve Loved You So Long” is a movie that pierces the essence of filial dynamics.

As much as “I’ve Loved You So Long” is a delicate, patient exploration of family relationships, “Rachel Getting Married,” a story which also hinges on the return of a damaged sister, this one arriving from rehab on the cusp of her sister‘s wedding weekend, is an overwrought, Mewl Age copper kitchen-sink drama.

Anne Hathaway plays Kym, the sister as welcome to the bride as a raccoon corpse in the crawl space, in a performance engineered for the Academy. She chain smokes, wears a goth fringe, circles her eyes with dark eyeliner, and tosses quips with sassy abandon, so that almost every bon mot reeks with sarcasm. Director Jonathan Demme seems to have encouraged her; a jovial rehearsal dinner of unrehearsed, naturalistically nervy speeches is punctuated by an all-too-obvious soliloquy which hollers “This is Anne Hathaway’s Oscar Moment,” where a sober Kym is the last to speak and delivers a rambling, spiteful and awkward diatribe. I half expected Kym to turn to the camera and purr “I’m ready for my close-up, Mr. Demme.”

The festivities are held in Kym and Rachel’s father’s rambling home of innumerable rooms; the square footage seems to have confined the film to big statements instead of small discoveries. The groom, Sidney, is a musician, and to underscore this point, Demme posts musicians in every nook. With so many mandolins and violins being strummed and plucked, the grounds resemble a Bluegrass Festival.

Rachel, played by Rosemarie DeWitt, is a hipster soccer mom type with a psychology degree and a hackneyed script, which makes her a tad unbearable, at times. Bill Irwin, a mime by trade, plays the “Don’t Worry, Be Happy” soppy father. Debra Winger pops by as Kym and Rachel’s distant, divorced mother, and executes a massively emotive scene with Hathaway, one where a great deal happens but which culminates in no ramifications. There‘s a whole bunch of teeth gnashing and raised voices as feelings are expressed in this film but very little insight. Yet “Rachel Getting Married” is so earnest it was probably made on recycled film stock.

It’s supposed to feel like an ensemble piece as the frenetic energy of the jarring cinematography from an unsteady cam darts around the home, but several of the more interesting and promising roles are woefully underdeveloped. Sidney, played by Tunde Adebimpe, the lead singer of TV on the Radio, is a likable, amiable bloke given too little to say. He generally reacts to the sisters’ pantomime. Mather Zickel, in the role of the groomsman, Kieran, provides a deft display and, unlike Kym, shows that addicts clearly can be people with wrenching dependency issues who can still connect to those close to them or, at the very least, can be civil. Other members of Sidney’s family and entourage are shown in cursory glimpses when more expanded, more rewarding roles were deserving. There’s another, superior movie here: Sidney Getting Married.


JCVD

A Van Damme Good Movie

November 25th, 2008

jcvd
In the mid 1990s, I enjoyed a film-going guilty pleasure by the name of Jean-Claude Van Damme. 

Perhaps a tad burnt out by art-house pretensions like “La Belle noiseuse” and “Prospero’s Books,” I would plunk down on opening day with a decidedly Testosterone-fueled crowd — a motley crew of sleeveless Megadeth concert-Ts and “two dudes who always put a seat between themselves because they aren’t that way” dudes —  to catch the latest Van Damme flick, indulging in a heaping serving of better-get-your-popcorn pulp.  The training wheels of his early “Bloodsport” and “Kickboxer” vehicles had been discarded as Hollywood attempted to make a movie star out of a martial arts tactician.  “Hard Target” was John Woo’s first American film and he and Van Damme provided considerable thrills on a modest budget. “Timecop” was implausible fun with a sly Ron Silver performance while the dependably suspenseful “Sudden Death” made an NHL game relevant.  They were entertaining, if imperfectly so, but Van Damme‘s athleticism and proficient direction by Woo and Peter Hyams made them pleasing diversions.  Blessed with boyish charm, hunky good looks and an appealing Belgian French accent, Van Damme even earned a prominent role on a post-Super Bowl “Friends.”

But just as suddenly as he’d kick started a respectable box-office niche, his career quickly evaporated into straight-to-DVD fare and the ignominy of sharing the screen with Dennis Rodman. He faded into punch line status as he became more famous for boasting he could crack walnuts with his buttocks.

So, it‘s no joke, “JCVD” is a revelation.  Always fictional but steeped in the autobiographical, it’s a movie about Jean-Claude Van Damme, but this is no caricature nor overt parody but instead a contemplation.  It’s heartfelt, clever, and at times, even mesmerizing.  The Versailles-born French director Mabrouk El Mechri has made one hell of a movie. El Mechri and his cinematographer, Pierre-Yves Bastard, which sounds like the name of a disappointing Van Damme character, have draped the film in a sepia-toned documentary style with washed out, muted colors and a grainy patina. The strong visual is matched by a smart, predominantly French script from El Mechri and his co-writers, Frederic Benudis and Christophe Turpin, which utilizes the legend of Van Damme without condescension.

“JCVD” is buoyed by a crafty opening in which Van Damme charges punching, gouging and kicking with considerable brio through a scene in one of his typical, uninspired projects, until, at cut, he engages in a darkly comical exchange with a young, disinterested director clearly disdainful of the film as anything other than a springboard, the sequence climaxing with the set crashing to the ground behind the weary Van Damme. The fourth wall is removed; and while the film is not told in first person, it is intimate and direct.

Embroiled in a child custody tussle and frustrated with the pathetic routine of his acting choices, Van Damme returns to his hometown of Brussels for a respite.  Instantly recognized and adored by shop clerks and taxi drivers, he pays a fateful visit to a post office in the Schaerbeek community which devolves into a bank robbery with hostages.  Given his publicized court troubles and a sighting at a window, the police believe Van Damme is the crook.  And the three thieves are pleased to use Jean-Claude as their foil.  

But as engrossing as the film is, a powerful scene showcasing Van Damme is an epiphany.  Van Damme is sitting in a non-descript chair in a back room of the post office.  Slowly the chair rises with the camera shot, until there is all black behind him, framing his haggard face and broad shoulders.  Van Damme speaks squarely to the camera, about his tenuous career, his unsettled life, an insatiable desire for love, his adoration for women, and the torment of drugs.  It is a confessional without a request for mercy, or pity. He accepts that he yearned for the fame which supplied him with what he desires and what bedevils him. He speaks for minutes on end, captivatingly, soulfully, and with clarity and raw emotion.  The chair floats back to the post office floor.  And you try to catch your breath. It is the single strongest concentrated piece of acting I’ve seen this year. Clearly Van Damme’s finest moment on screen, it would buttress the resume of any noted film actor working today.  

We always thought the dexterity was in his hips as he swiveled his foot into a standing man’s chin, but, perhaps, nurtured by a sincere director such as the emerging El Mechri and proffered a role like Jean Reno’s in “The Professional” or Toshiro Mifune’s in “Yojimbo,” he can resurrect his career with characters which meld the physicality of the action star with an informed depth.

When placing his trust in a young director whose only other feature-length film was 2005’s little seen “Virgil,” Van Damme must have been fearful that a misstep in El Mechri’s approach could lead to a patronizing tone or, worse, a cartoonish, lampooned portrayal. But El Mechri has respectfully repaid the faith that  Jean-Claude entrusted in him by creating the most unexpected instant cult classic of 2008.


Happy-Go-Lucky

Life is Sweet

November 11th, 2008

happygo
Admittedly, I went to see “Happy-Go-Lucky” as a diversion on the early evening of the most anticipated election night.  

As the film begins, Pauline ‘Poppy’ Cross (Sally Hawkins), the embodiment of the title, is shown riding her bicycle, helmetless, along London streets from Granby Place to Finsbury Park with a sweetly goofy smile creasing her face, and it quickly became easier to forget politics.  

The present-day story is quite straight-forward and carries a familiar tone for a Mike Leigh film; It’s not a tumultuous time in Poppy’s life — we follow the 30-year-old as she bops along to work, cavorts at a flamenco dance class, learns to drive and latterly embarks on a relationship — but the film captures wonderfully how Poppy embraces the prosaic earnestly and fully.  She is a primary school teacher of a multicultural class of 7 and 8-year-olds who seems to relish cutting, painting and clucking around in a chicken mask as much, if not more so, as the children do.  For the best part of a decade, Poppy, who dresses in outfits pinched from Pat Benatar’s “Love is a Battlefield” video, has lived with her acerbic flat mate and fellow teacher, Zoe (Alexis Zegerman).  Together they enjoy nights out at the disco with the girls but they’re not a frivolous duo and while they’re both seeking substantial relationships, there’s no self pitying in their bemoaning the lack of prospects. 

As befitting a Mike Leigh film, the movie isn’t skewed to the sweet side completely.  With her bike stolen, which she accepts with a good natured shrug, Poppy decides to learn to drive and engages the services of an instructor. Initially Scott (Eddie Marsan) appears to be a stern tutor but as the weekly lessons continue, he becomes increasingly vitriolic, especially when he bemoans a nation he perceives as under threat from the melting pot; he doesn’t see it as half-empty or half-full but overflowing. But Poppy is no dupe.  She mocks him with snarky asides, her sense of humor hardly disguising her growing unease with his small-minded nastiness. Yet, she does want to understand where his frothing anger comes from, why his Britain is not her Britain, how he despises the beauty she sees so clearly in her classroom, and the final lesson between the two is kinetic without being overwrought. 

In films such as “Life is Sweet” and “Secrets & Lies,“ Leigh has tamped the quotidian lives of ordinary people to unearth splendid insights into the human condition. Leigh orchestrates one of these moments in “Happy-Go-Lucky” when Zoe, Poppy and her incorrigible youngest sister (Kate O’Flynn) visit their married middle sister, Helen, smugly ensconced in suburbia, with her overmatched husband, Jamie (Oliver Maltman). Pregnant and insecure, Helen (Caroline Martin) goads and chides Poppy about family, children and mortgages, remonstrating that her older sister  can‘t be as cheerful as she purports to be.  Poppy delivers a heartfelt and assured defense.  The tension is heightened above a simmer but doesn’t explode, so that like so many family moments, Helen slinks off to bed in a sulk, the remaining unease as uncomfortable as a pull-out sofa sleeper.  

With an actress of less acumen and poise, Poppy may have devolved quickly into an insipid caricature. Luckily, Hawkins plays the part with ample integrity and intellect. She dispatches naiveté as Poppy’s cheeky, fun-loving persona is grounded in a conscientious and sensible ethic. Vitally, “Happy-Go-Lucky” is centered around this performance of exquisite bravura. 

A curmudgeon could balk at Poppy’s sunny disposition, her indefatigable spirit could be dismissed as twee, and her irresistible optimism could be condemned as unrealistic and childish, but when the film was over, and I stepped outside the theater, and the world had won, and it seemed like every face was plastered with a sweetly goofy smile, it was as though a planetful of Poppy’s had sprung up, each giddy with a good natured last laugh for the cynics.


Hamlet 2

Jesus Christ Stuporstar

October 16th, 2008

hamlet21-1
Steve Coogan has created, since the mid 1990s, some of the most inedible comic mischiefs in British television.  From the unctuous Alan Partridge, a passive aggressive, Abba-obsessed chat show host who dangles on a tightrope between obsequiousness and open loathing for his guests to Tommy Saxondale, a former classic-rock band roadie turned grimaced exterminator who constantly spits exasperated vitriol through gritted teeth, he has become a foremost practitioner of cringe comedy.

Like John Cleese with Basil Fawlty and Ricky Gervais with David Brent, Coogan has the ability to make nutters connectible, substantial and if not likable, then, at least, not rooted against.  However, his movie career, so far, has failed to furnish him with a signature comic persona to compare to his TV titans.  It’s not to say that he hasn’t showcased stellar performances as a film actor.  He delivered a confident portrayal of music impresario Tony Wilson in  Michael Winterbottom’s “24 Hour Party People,“ offered a sharply entertaining turn as a tart-tongued actor in Winterbottom’s “Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story” and exuded laid back poignancy teamed with Alfred Molina in Jim Jarmusch’s “Coffee and Cigarettes.”  

But these portrayals haven’t required the comic largesse he possesses.  From such a captivating comedian who is a masterful mimic as well — instead of another Sean Connery, he delivers a pitch-perfect Roger Moore — we await a riveting big screen presence, a task, so far, clearly beyond the grasp of his Hollywood ventures as well. In these films, it is a bleak resume of generally unremarkable parts such as Phileas Fogg in the unpleasant and thoroughly unnecessary remake of “Around the World in 80 Days,” Octavius in the underwhelming “Night at the Museum” and as the ill-fated but unmemorable director in “Tropic Thunder.“  In his stateside ventures, Coogan appears neutered; he’s cast in parts hardly requiring his specific, formidable talent.

So with the strong buzz emanating from the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year for “Hamlet 2,” his role as Dana Marschz, a forlorn Tucson high school drama teacher, seemed like an epiphanic moment. Unfortunately, while the role begins to capture the inventiveness of Coogan, the mercurial film directed by Andrew Fleming and co-written by Fleming and Pam Brady is a disappointment. 

“Hamlet 2” is book ended by a very nifty beginning and a sensational final reel with a musical that is roaringly funny, clever, inspired and profane. Songs such as “Rock Me, Sexy Jesus” “You’re as Gay as the Day is Long and “Raped in the Face” are wincingly catchy.  But the invention can’t disguise a gooey, unformed center, underscored by classroom scenes which feel dated and comedically rote.  The throng of Hispanic students transferred into his acting class of two sycophants is stuffed into stereotypes without sending them up successfully.  The unruly students, who we know will undergo a metamorphosis  from cynics to thespians, are the focus of an unfunny parody which feels like “Stand and Deliver Lines.”

Marschz is introduced by bouts of physical humor, funny at first but too broad by far, so that when he roller skates to school, he skates so badly he holds up traffic in a pantomime way.  The scene overplays the absurdity, like the moment where he arrives to class wearing a kaftan, without underpants, and slips and flips over.  He is odd, full stop.  He’s too silly, too distant to become the transformative influence the incorrigible class and plot requires.  There’s no depth to his character.  He is made so hapless that the final completed and complicated musical numbers of this sequel to Hamlet seem well beyond him.

A scene where Dana visits a student’s begrudging parents underlines his disconnect.  The father (Marco Rodriguez in a meaty cameo) is a university scholar, of literature, who can’t abide the concept that someone, especially a teacher, would deign to make a sequel to Hamlet.  It could have been an interesting and funny discussion.  But Coogan’s character doesn’t connect with the father intellectually and instead physical humor bosses the moment.  If the musical had been penned by the father, then, yes, it would seem plausible but Dana lacks the dexterity, depth and panache to author this work.

Sadly, the plot becomes enamored with a tiresome “Will they be able to put the play on?” dilemma as the school administration intervenes against the material.  The film is lumbered with a berating, drill sergeant of a principal (Marshall Bell) and a haughty ACLU attorney (Amy Poehler).  A more interesting and engaging comedy would have sidestepped the heavy-handedness and one-note tenor of the antagonists and simply asked the question, “How did the play come together?”

Likewise, a subplot involving his wife (Catherine Keener, aptly cast as a harridan) seems overbearing and tangential.  (Again, because of the lack of connection, you’re left pondering how they ever hooked up in the first place.)  It’s piling on a pathetic character and just ends up feeling mean.  “Hamlet 2” lacks the tenderness of a film like “Little Miss Sunshine,“ which leavened the eccentricity of the characters with genuine affection for each other.  It doesn’t mean the film melted into mush; it just got real and human.  Steve Coogan can play real humans, real funny.  We’re just still waiting to see it on the big screen.


The Grocer’s Son

A Glass Half Full

September 16th, 2008

08grocerxlarge1
At some moment, on a shaded late summer afternoon or a still warm autumn early evening, as you’ve been splayed on a comfy outdoor chaise lounge, a friend has handed you a glass of wine, usually a white, like a pinot grigio, announced its brand and appellation, and you’ve taken a first sip, a simplistically satisfying swallow, and while you’ve told yourself to remember the name of the wine, you’ve forgotten halfway through the bottle.

“The Grocer’s Son” is that varietal of movie.

Antoine (Nicolas Cazale) is an aimless young man in his late 20s, flitting between stints waiting tables, living in a studio apartment the size of a meager dorm room, who seems to have run away from his provincial Provence upbringing rather than towards the allure of Paris.  He sports the former amateur boxer visage of a Dolce & Gabbana print model; it’s a face which could sell trousers, or remove them.  His father’s sudden illness brings the adrift Antoine back to the bucolic landscape of his childhood as he agrees to help the family grocery business by driving a delivery van into the villages.  Antoine invites a friend, an apartment-building neighbor, Claire (Clotilde Hesme), a 26-year-old prospective student to whom he is attracted, to come along.  While she is enamored with a trip to the country, Antoine, upon arrival, is instantly uneasy and prickly, his mother and an older brother the target of his mental pins and needles.  It’s not so much “Look Back in Anger” for Antoine as “Look Back in Utter Exasperation.“ 

Antoine and Claire drive through the winding roads of the valley, delivering eggs, peas, salami and all sorts of sundries to the mostly elderly denizens of the villages.  Luckily, “The Grocer’s Son” doesn’t oversell the villager’s folksiness. In particular, the roles of Mr. Clement (Paul Crauchet) and Lucienne (Liliane Rovere) are graced with touching, real moments. 

When his father (Daniel Duval) returns from the hospital, with his gouged road map of a mug replete with a pinched two-pack-a -day mouth and sideburns like a motorcycle kickstand, the story begins to illustrate the residue of his fully-formed scowl.  But the film doesn’t delve into these relationships with much depth, treating details like junk food so that the frustration fraught in these family dynamics is obtuse,  so you’re never entirely sure where Antoine’s disquiet comes from.  The brother, a not-so-recently separated salon owner with considerable emotional difficulties, is, in particular, an unformed role in need of more insight.

Clearly, “The Grocer’s Son” could be more demonstrative, more insistent. But director Eric Guirado still crafts a film which is well-paced, attractive and solidly pleasing despite skimming on the specifics.  And, to that, one can raise a glass of whatever it’s called.


Forgetting Sarah Marshall

So Sarong

June 30th, 2008

forgetting-sarah-marshall-05
As a freshly heartbroken boyfriend, Jason Segel has wounded eyes, a naturally depressed countenance, and, in a most vulnerable of moments, an exposed penis. Fresh from a shower, he alights from the bathroom to find his long-term girlfriend, a television cop show star, breaking up with him.  He is naked, not even a modest towelette to cover his intimates.  The scene displays genuine vulnerability and is wincingly funny. Generally a bit player in the SuperFreaks ensemble, he shows in “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” that he is a strong presence when he‘s given a bigger part.  As Peter Bretter, the incidental music composer for his girlfriend’s show, Segel is pitch perfect as he excels in both the ribald situations and the delicate moments. 

Segel is the fulcrum of “Forgetting Sarah Marshall,” a film which follows Peter just weeks later to Hawaii, where by purposeful accident he stays at the same resort as Sarah and her new beau, Aldous Snow, a Rock God archetype, all shirts buttoned at the navel, if at all, played by English comic phenomenon, Russell Brand.  Long, lanky hair to the middle of his back, he exudes all the tubular swagger of The Cult’s Ian Ashbury with a sprig of Robbie Williams’ impishness.  And Brand is the film’s second revelation.

In England, he is a comic superstar. Ostensibly a standup, in reality the ebullient sex symbol is a gothic raconteur renowned for hysterical musings on chat shows and quiz programs. His reputation as a lothario is so celebrated that in recent years the sensationalistic tabloid The Sun dubbed him “Shagger of the Year.“  Brand’s style is narcissistic but whimsical and self abasing. The Radio 2 show he and good friend Matt Morgan host is two frantic hours of stream-of consciousness; the podcast is the BBC’s most downloaded. His autobiography released earlier this year in Britain was an instant bestseller and presented in his typically forthcoming manner. Brand’s the type of public personality who doesn’t draw a line between the personal and the professional, whose foibles and fables cohabitate.   

Segel, who wrote the script, clearly admires Brand’s comic style and allows him to infuse his performance with ramblings familiar to his radio audience. But Brand does not overwhelm the tone or derail the story. He’s no insurgent. And the lack of rivalry in this working relationship is mimicked by the absence of animosity shared between Peter and Aldous. It would have been the soft way to paint Brand’s character as an easy-to-loathe pomposity, a British over-the-top oaf. Yet the shirtless Aldous and vulnerable Peter actually quite like each other. So the anticipated “teat-a-teat” rivalry never materializes. And this development makes the eponymous Sarah Marshall, played ably enough by Kristen Bell, a peripheral character.

The Apa-in-tows — Paul Rudd, Jonah Hill and Bill Hader — all make an appearance and are pleasing interlopers without being memorable. And Mila Kunis as Peter’s new love interest  begins her hopefully successful emergence from the shadow of her eight years as Jackie on “That 70s Show.”

First-time director Nicholas Stoller shows restraint and stays out of the way. Some of the funniest moments are very quick visual gags which luckily make their point with brevity unlike too many SNL/”Superbad” overstayed-their-welcome skits. He also incorporates not one but two fantastic TV cop show send-ups which are so silly that irony deficient executives at the major networks will be dismayed they can’t debut them this fall. Reportedly, Stoller will helm Brand and Hill in “Get Him to the Greek,” a film built on the premise that a raucous wayward rock star — one suspects played by Brand not Hill —  must be chaperoned during a Los Angeles tour stop. It’s fingers crossed that it serves as a worthy successor.