Archive for the ‘Reviews K-O’ Category

 

Twilight & Let the Right One In

The Kids Are All Fright

February 23rd, 2009

lettheright2
The infobahn is atwitter with “Twilight.” While the North American box office nears $200 million and the world-wide figures double that return, and stories abound of behind-the-scenes intrigue with machinations so rabid that the director has been excised from the sequel and a third film has already been marked on calendars for 2010, the clamor can’t conceal that this vampire movie is a trifle, an unremarkable film so slight that random episodes of “Buffy” bustle with more humor, charm, wonderment, and, most importantly, verve. Catherine Hardwicke has directed a film without magic or vitality, fatal exclusions for a fantasy flick.

The story of Bella, an Arizona teenager who shuttles herself off to small-town Washington state to live with her police chief father and subsequently becomes enraptured by a relationship with a dashing vampire, is told stiltingly, with too many scenes of high schoolers staring longingly at each other across the school cafeteria. (It suggests, as much as anything, that they are unimpressed by the tater tots and wiener wraps.) The voiceover from Bella adds very little to character understanding and fails to enhance the narrative. From a vampire flick perspective there‘s precious little pep so by the time anyone is Columbia Gorged, the attenuated “Twilight” offers nothing fresh in its execution with uninspiring special effects and meager action sequences, especially in a baseball game sequence which is equally hokey and undeveloped. The final battle in a hall of mirrors feels both forced and small — a fair reflection of the preceding story.

Exacerbating a tepidly told tale is the casting of Bella, a character of no particular individual spark in the first place, with Kristen Stewart, an actress so wooden it was difficult to distinguish the old growth forest from her tease. She delivers almost every line in an uninspired hushed rush, a breakneck breathless monotone that doesn’t evoke teenaged awkwardness as much as suggests laconic boredom.

As Edward, the perpetually 17-year-old vampire, Robert Pattinson exhibits some nice acting chops as Bella‘s paramour. He conveys Edward’s brooding intensity, conflicted impulses, and self-conscious sweetness with style. To compound Bella’s somnolence, the ancillary roles of her new, eager schoolmates (whom she appears to be find tedious) are played by an energetic and funny lot.

“Twilight” is a franchise in search of fangs and is devoured by “Let the Right One In,“ the Swedish masterwork, which despite currently earning less than $2 million on this continent and just over $5 million across the globe, is an enriching experience which deserves massive message board devotion and an audience more substantial than one delivered by midnight movie cult status. Director Tomas Alfredson redefines the vampire flick with a film that, while respecting the elements of the genre with beautifully choreographed genuine scares and unsightly frights replete with swirls of cats and bleeding eyes, is infused with intelligence, grace and humanity.

Based on the 2004 novel by John Ajvide Lindqvist, who adapted his work for the screen, it tells the tale of 12-year-old Oskar (Kare Hedebrant), a latch key kid bullied at school, who befriends a new arrival to his apartment block, a fellow 12-year-old, Eli (Lina Leandersson), who is actually a centuries old vampire. Oskar is adrift — not saddled with loneliness as much as that inexorable pre-teen sense of awkwardness and uncertainty that even the most self-assured youth is pursued by — and finds a quietly receptive partner to his unassuming desire to bond in Eli. She is alone, immersed in a secret life, and Oskar is a trustworthy ally with an affection that is more than a crush but not yet carnal. Alfredson does a remarkable job of building this burgeoning friendship, illustrating the tender uneasy steps of the pre-teens, and nurturing pitch-perfect performances from the pair as well.

But what makes “Let the Right One In“ so exceptional is the way Alfredson and his crew handles the ever-changing moods so deftly with the quieter, more evocative moments and the grisly sequences delivered with equal aplomb. The switching back between the differing tones is expertly mastered by co-editors Alfredson and Daniel Jonsater (and filmed compellingly by cinematographer Hoyte Van Hoytema) so that the gentle moments never feel ingratiating and the eerie scenes are thoroughly dense and chilling. Nothing feels stop gap; every is integral. Similarly, the soundtrack by Johan Soderqvist is wonderfully adept at enhancing the variation, producing sweeping orchestration for the thrilling scenes but also very melodic, spare musical interludes during the softer, more introspective instances.

By the time “Let the Right One In” culminates in a brilliantly realized swimming pool sequence which submerges the film in an act of devotional vigilantism, it is clear that this is a superlative work, one of the finest films of the last year, whose quality is not hinged to any niche and which has no need for a sequel to embolden its legacy.


Milk

It Does A Body Politic Good

December 19th, 2008

milk5
For a film clearly cradled in the sad, poignant context of Harvey Milk’s fate, beginning with grainy file footage of police persecution and the actual moment of Dianne Feinstein announcing an assassination, “Milk” is a joyous remembrance. Far removed from the vibe of his recent obtuse efforts, Gus Van Sant has made a distinctly human work which by the closing credits is a potpourri of the inspiring, moving, tender, riotously funny and genuinely heartwarming.

The downfall of the biopic is that so often the hero is placed on a pedestal or damned by a fatal flaw, or commonly both. But Harvey Milk just seemed to be a galvanizing dude who liked dudes and who wanted to envelope the political and social worlds with fundamental human rights. He may have been the self-anointed “Mayor of Castro Street” but he was no rock star. A small business owner of a modest camera shop, Milk bonded with people in a quotidian way, banding together the people of his San Francisco community – the elderly, union laborers, business owners and even the hustlers, amongst others — into a coalition of the distinct, unifying their separate vulnerability into a progressive collective. Politically ardent but not interested in political machinations, he was motivating on a common level, with an eye-to-eye connection, as he became a perpetual candidate in local campaigns.

Sean Penn is a marvel in the title role as he constructs a characterization which isn’t mimicry or pantomime but the wonderful embodiment of a gifted and genuine man who was a bit of a square, the kind of guy who had Sylvester perform at his birthday party but didn’t actually dance. Penn creases his face regularly with a wide, infectious grin as he plays Harvey as the consummate people person. There’s not a dab of the method actor in his performance. He portrays Milk as heartfelt, bullhorn in hand, awkwardly thrusting his fist to the sky, exhorting crowds but not prone to soliloquies; instead his calls for action were impassioned yet swift. A scene with his huddled campaign cohorts where Milk advocates everyone coming out and living as openly gay folks doesn’t seem as much like an earnest clarion call as it does a matter-of-fact belief. It’s simply the thing to do. Later, after his election as a city supervisor, when Harvey debates an arch conservative in a contentious venue, the succinct simplicity of his arguments and the unveiling of his opponent’s contradictions are demonstrated in a clever but understated manner. The story and script by Dustin Lance Black highlight this quality of the empowering everyman. Whereas films centered on politics can be, if not careful, ponderous or self important, Van Sant makes sure to show that joining up on a Milk campaign was exhilarating and fun. All work and no flirt would have made Harvey and his buddies very dull boys.

The film incorporates an astute storytelling device which discards the voiceover or contemporaries’ recollections by having Milk speak into a microphone at his kitchen table in his modest, unadorned apartment. As he sits in his nondescript chair, tape recording autobiographical events, Penn’s delivery helps emphasize his sincere, authentic, and vulnerable qualities.

The supporting cast is instilled with stellar performances. They infuse the campaign rooms with camaraderie. But a few roles are worthy of particular praise. An almost unrecognizable Emile Hirsch plays the plucky Cleve Jones, a quick-study political neophyte. James Franco, who is graced with leading man looks but a character actor’s quirk, is warm and engaging as Scott Smith, the most important love of Harvey’s life. Diego Luna enters the story with a flourish in the later reels as Milk’s final paramour, Jack Lira. He also secures himself first dibs from casting directors in The Father Guido Sarducci Story.

Van Sant has created a film which is more than evocative of the 1970s. There’s a seamless quality to the interspersing between the archival film and the fictional account utilized throughout the movie. Cinematographer Harris Savides adopts a terrific muted retro look which is a similar visual style to the one he used so successfully in “Zodiac.” The art direction from Charley Beal and set decoration by Barbara Munch are sterling, costume designer Danny Glicker expertly drapes the cast in authentic garb, and the hair and makeup departments of Steven E. Anderson and Michael White have done exemplary work.

So 1978 seems like 2008 and, even, like tomorrow. As we snigger, almost aghast, at the shameless bigotry of the actual Anita Bryant from footage supporting a California proposition to fire gay and lesbian teachers, we realize that in the intervening thirty years society isn’t yet that far removed from her beliefs as votes denying consenting gays and lesbians the right to enter into civil marriage sadly abound. But “Milk” isn’t concentrated on the sour orange juice shills. The legacy of Harvey Milk is that a regular guy ardently speaking sensible, meaningful truths is pertinent, heartening, and rousing. This is one righteous and upbeat elegy which could be fittingly titled “You Make Me Feel (Mighty Real).”


Kung Fu Panda

Haiku Fidelity

August 28th, 2008

kung_fu_panda_movie_image
The grandest asset of “Kung Fu Panda” is its greatest pitfall. Jack Black dominates as the title character and he’s undeniably terrific but his presence is so overpowering that he suffocates the film. 

When a comedian becomes iconic like Black, the humor begins to emanate from familiarity. The rhythm of his voice, the cadence of his delivery, and his bountiful physical exuberance can lead an audience to laugh in anticipation even before Black has delivered a punch line.  In “High Fidelity” Black captivated with his manic energy and people became instant fans of the dynamo with the soulful pipes in one of the films of the 2000s.  Since then Black’s tenacious persona has become a distinctly beloved comic presence. “The School of Rock” could have been a cringe-worthy exercise with a lead who brought less commitment and belief to the role of Dewey Finn. A recent Sesame Street appearance made a lesson about octagons a winsome moment. And as illustrated in DreamWorks’ “Kung Fu Panda,“ no one says “Awesome” with the same joyous verve.  

So you can’t blame directors Mark Osborne and John Stevenson for making a film which is essentially a Jack Black vehicle. But it’s a glaring example where moderation would have been a wiser option, and a less-is-more approach may have ensured a more complete and resonating work. 

“Kung Fu Panda” opens on a vibrant, teeming Chinese city reminiscent of a scene from Richard Scarry’s “Busy, Busy World” but the film falters as the focus turns to Black‘s lovable yet hapless panda, Po.  The film feels smaller and less robust than several recent animated wonders, especially the studio’s own “Flushed Away.” The other characters lack true distinction and are lumped into a not-Jack Black pack. They simply aren’t given the personality or pizzazz of Po. Secondary characters feel, well, secondary. Furthermore, the script wavers in quality and relies all-too-often on trite aphorisms.  

The makers of “Kung Fu Panda” should have studied the efforts of those quality animated films and noticed they haven’t allowed a single vocal talent to dominate.  You would have to be well coached to know that Craig T. Nelson was the voice of Mr. Incredible.  And few would have recognized instantly that the lead actors in “Flushed Away” were Hugh Jackman and Kate Winslet.  And just last year “Ratatouille” utilized Patton Oswalt’s talents but the tremendous stand-up’s distinct comic persona doesn’t begin to overwhelm. It simply melds into a larger, luxurious tale.

 “Kung Fu Panda” is enjoyable and you’d have to be a surly curmudgeon to dismiss its charming moments.  But making Black the whole focus creates an unbalanced film that is something short of “Awesome.“