Posts Tagged ‘Clive Owen’

 

Duplicity

Seeing Stars

May 1st, 2009

duplicity-movie-15
To those who lament the lack of movie stars in motion pictures, “Duplicity” offers solace.

Presently, Hollywood showcases actors of varying talents; what it doesn’t have on a consistent basis is silver screen icons. There are a plethora of good actors who hold our attention, surely, but far too many seem to favor self-indulgent and disconnected parts. Bankable names like Russell Crowe, Johnny Depp and Christian Bale choose roles where they almost exclusively portray loners, apparently finding comfort in their character’s insularity and by losing themselves in costumes, accents and affectations. Powerful but distant, their detachment makes them feel small and isolated. There are thespians, fine artisans such as Philip Seymour Hoffman or Hillary Swank, who, bluntly, just don‘t radiate that “It” quality. And we’re encumbered with another generation of headshot pretty, vacant line readers; while that may be no different than the age of the studio contracts, it doesn’t alter the perception that they are merely wisps of space. Animation and special effects have nudged out, if not supplanted in many instances, live actors, both the gifted and the rubbish.

Perhaps nowhere has this dearth of magnetism been more telling than in romanticism because those box-office behemoths are just too comfortable playing the emotionally unavailable. Has Crowe ever cuddled on-screen? Has Depp ever swept a paramour off her feet? Has Bale ever swooned? It seems they’re too laden with breast plates and scissor hands for a little slap and tickle. With A-List actresses summarily jilted, it’s left to foreign flicks like “Priceless” or independent films such as “Milk” or even animation to provide the spark. It is telling that “WALL-E” was one of 2008’s most meaningful expositions on intimacy. It’s gotten so desperate that it can’t be too long until lesser lights attempt a computer-generated romance; coming this autumn, “PS, CGI Love You.”

In “Duplicity,“ Julia Roberts and Clive Owen exemplify not only the essence of being a movie star; they show self-indulgent SAG sack superstars how to bring sexy back. In his follow-up to the fabulous “Michael Clayton,” director and writer Tony Gilroy returns to the rubric of corporate intrigue through a lighter prism with Roberts and Owen as CIA and MI6 operatives who become lovers, retire from government spying, and enter the nefarious domain of corporate espionage by working for competing cutthroat multinational cosmetics companies. A byzantine plot trundles in a circuitous route, leaping back and forth through the last six years, skipping across continents. And while the film never flags, the labyrinthine machinations deviate from what makes “Duplicity” so much fun: the unforced chemistry from two scintillating performers. Through all of the plot twists and story subterfuge, Roberts and Owen deliver performances that accrete seamlessly as they let fly with sharp, flirtatious repartee that harkens to an age when witty verbal jousts between besotted equals were commonplace.

Roberts radiates the supreme confidence of a Tinseltown pro in her turn as the Claire Stenwick. With a twinkle in her eye, she has a certain Rosalind Russell vibe when swatting away Owen‘s chat up lines, or feeding him one of her own. Owen cleans up quite nicely for this film. In recent years, he‘s carved out a terrific resume in such films as “Sin City,” “Children of Men” and “Shoot ‘Em Up,” where he carried a perpetual seven o‘clock shadow like it was a trusty six shooter. But with smooth, high cheekbones shading his face like a single bruise on an apple, a clean-shaven Owen generates a stellar comic technique as Ray Koval. Wearing button down shirts even when on vacation, he looks like the dapper stud in the Lancôme cologne ads. (Before this film, if he was being paid in scents, it would have been British Sterling.)

Gilroy casts the additional, secondary roles with astute choices. Tom Wilkinson is eerie disquiet as Howard Tully, the paranoid conglomerate CEO. Wilkinson is wickedly adept at finding the unnerving in a normal moment. As his rival, Richard Garsik, a snarling Paul Giamatti continues to construct the supporting actor as All-Star relief pitcher, a Mad Hungarian of frothy interjections and ruthless maliciousness. Further fine actors such as Denis O’Hare and Thomas McCarthy make up a notable “Michael Clayton” ensemble.

But “Duplicity” is best when focused on the pulchritudinous pair bonding with a terrific alchemy and it is this relationship which fomented my earlier (perhaps too) curmudgeonly rhetoric. Roberts and Owen simply provide a dwindling presence that makes going to movies so wondrous. Sometimes it’s just exhilarating to sit in a darkened theater watching movie stars.


Vicky Cristina Barcelona

American Paella

October 31st, 2008

penelope-cruz-barcelona

I

“Vicky Cristina Barcelona” could be a two-hour tonic for a weary American or a tourism brochure for a Gaudí city or the catalyst for an expatriate odyssey. But even for those without wanderlust, the film luxuriates in an adult, intelligent, and airy manner, gently titillating, seriously flirting.

II

Javier Bardem is a “Brings It” dude, as in “He Brings It.”  Like current contemporaries of this insatiable machismo, Clive Owen and Daniel Craig, he exudes rugged confidence with a rumpled insouciance. In “Vicky Cristina Barcelona,” even his Adam’s apple is tumescent.  

III

Fittingly, he burst onto the scene in Bigas Luna’s lusty 1992 “Jamón, jamón” as “El chorizo.”

IV

At an age where men, especially, have a startling tendency to turn inwards, mistaking obstinance for self assuredness, the 72-year-old Woody Allen is able to create as a screenwriter a multitude of distinct characters who are independent entities, viable and vibrant, who are seeking and searching for that which fulfills them. Consequences aren’t damned but honesty and openness are virtues.

V

You can detect the recalcitrant Allen persona in Rebecca Hall’s Vicky, squirming with an internal struggle between a Wall Street fiancé with polo shirts tucked into chinos and Bardem in shirts which seem buttoned with a lick of the lips. It’s navel gazing of an entirely different sort.

VI

Scarlett Johansson is an enigma.  Possessing art-house cache with turns in “Ghostworld” and “Lost in Translation,” one has suspected that her talent is more (pants) suited for a shitting on the dock of a Michael Bay blockbuster.  But she embodies Cristina effortlessly.  In the moment at a late supper, where she and Vicky first meet Bardem’s artist Juan Antonio, she sums up her character‘s sense of adventurous and autonomous sexuality.  While Vicky is loathe to reward his advances as a first impression, Cristina respects Juan Antonio’s chat up lines as refreshing, bullshit-free effusions. It is a hallmark of Allen’s dexterous script that he provides both women with believable, reasoned and witty insight.

VII

For a country where lad mags have to remind couples that they could have sex at times other than bedtime, “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” is a paean to spontaneity, an example to statesiders to not only live in the moment, but to live in your moment.  

VIII

Penelope Cruz is a powerhouse.  Reminiscent of Anna Magnani in “The Rose Tattoo,” Cruz prowls the screen as Maria Elena, Juan Antonio’s ex-wife, but hardly his ex.  A few years ago, Cruz faced a tenuous time in her career as she made a strange transatlantic crossing in projects like  “Woman on Top,” “Vanilla Sky,” and “Sahara.” But, this year, with a role of this magnitude along with a brave performance in “Elegy,”  it appears her days as Steve Zahn’s sidekick may become a trivial memory.

IX

Graced with a gossamer disposition but buoyed as an actress with acute strength, Patricia Clarkson shines in a memorable cameo as the dignified but disquieted Judy Nash, who provides Vicky and Cristina with a villa for the summer, and perspective. Ensnared in a marriage to a mashed potatoes financier, Judy finds herself in a desiccating relationship bereft of turmoil but lacking in passion, made more desperate by her husband’s obliviousness to her unease.

X

The soundtrack is a flamenco-infused delight of many moods. From the opening credits of the jaunty, toe-tapping “Barcelona” by Guilia y Los Tellarini to the dramatic, sensual guitar work of Juan Serrano on “Gorrion,” the music is riveting, essential and a character all its own.


Wanted

Bullet the Blue Sky

August 31st, 2008

angelinajolie_wanted
After the art-house buzz for his modern vampire fables “Night Watch” and “Day Watch,” Timur Bekmambetov became a hot property. Atmospheric and spooky, “Night Watch” was riveting entertainment. Providing a welcome twist to the oft-told subject, it contained tangible menace in an epic style as well as a fantastic animated sequence and wonderful set pieces — especially a finely constructed scene which followed the path of a single screw along its journey as it fell from a plane into the bowels of a building. The sequel “Day Watch” ratcheted up the intensity into an apocalyptic showdown replete with a soundtrack of thrash metal and haunting chorale choruses which was still nimble enough to successfully blend tenderness and acute comic touches into the mix.

In his Hollywood debut, “Wanted,“ Bekmambetov showcases absurdly badass moments but only in fits and starts in a film which feels comparatively restrained and incomplete to his earlier works.

Yet, the opening scenes of the film form the foundation for an interesting social satire of a downtrodden cubicle dweller recruited to become an assassin. There’s a Walter Mitty air to the character of Wesley Allan Gibson (James McAvoy).  And the rat race symbolism is unrelenting but effective. However the film veers away from this treatment and spends too much time in training-the-new-guy mode so that it loses this intriguing perspective and lurches towards becoming a  pedestrian affair.

Sadly for a talent as compelling as Bekmambetov, “Wanted” doesn’t really let go.  It lacks a certain sense of abandon, and even fun. When a film doesn‘t appear to embrace the joke of something as absurd as the “Loom of Fate“ you’d suspect that the director was a misanthrope, if you didn‘t know any better.  But both “Night Watch“ and “Day Watch“ revel in humorous moments, even if many of them are black. Perhaps because, unlike “Wanted,“ he co-wrote the screenplays for his two earlier hallmark films, he felt more comfortable finding the gradations of humor amidst the seriousness.  But it may be simply that in his first effort in the States working with Universal Pictures he felt impinged.  Even this film’s signature visual effect of bullets bent by mind control lacks the relish associated with Bekmambetov’s style.

So if you want a mind-blowing shoot ‘em up, then there’s none better this decade than the criminally unseen “Shoot ’Em Up.” Blessed with the marketing budget of, say, the national Green Party, “Shoot ‘Em Up” snuck into theaters last fall for a mere few weeks before being consigned to cult status: You can’t get more cult than a stupendous Clive Owen, Monica Bellucci, and Paul Giamatti flick that due to its tepid American box office allegedly opened in a single Australian theater.  So only a few lucky Melburnians got to see the Michael Davis film which was outlandish, inspired and breakneck. Conversely, while “Wanted” was bestowed with a gargantuan promotional campaign, it is comparably slight and underwhelming. 

The attraction for McAvoy to the role of Wesley Allan Gibson is apparent. He seems to revel in the forlorn Gibson, with his exhausted countenance, crumply dress shirts, and vigorously bitten fingernails. But the rest of the characters are completely unblinking, unfunny automatons. They are exceedingly cool but vacant.  As the master of the assassins, Morgan Freeman has perfected his chilled persona so expertly that it would be refreshing if we could describe one of his characters as “bat-shit crazy.“ Angelina Jolie traipses across the set likes it‘s a runway.  She apparently was paid a great deal to stretch, pout and smirk; not so much for acting. Terence Stamp brought along his startling blue eyes and sonorous voice for an absolute throwaway role which suggests he must have had a spare Bank Holiday weekend.

The ending to “Wanted” is well-crafted nonsense.  A major component of the conclusion is that characters have to make dramatic, ultimate choices but because there’s been no development for any role other than McAvoy’s, there’s no context and the decisions feels forced and vacuous. Sadly, for a filmmaker with as much vitality as Bekmambetov, it’s disappointing to meet this finale with a shrug.

Hopefully, with his next venture, reportedly the third installment in the “Watch” trilogy, he will revert to completing a film worthy of his audacious talent.  He is capable of making films simultaneously over-the-top and under control. Just maybe not in Hollywood, yet.