Posts Tagged ‘James Wong Howe’

 

Public Enemies

Mannhattan Melodrama

July 17th, 2009

public-enemies
For a second time I sat through the two and a half hours of Michael Mann’s “Public Enemies.” And twice I’ve been disappointed. At a preview attended last December, the underwhelming biopic starring Johnny Depp as John Dillinger was an unenergetic, sullen, and tepid effort. But I thought it unfair to critique the film when this summer release could have been transformed, yet the intervening seven months have brought no discernible changes or judicious edits. It’s surprising to see, once again, a movie from a director whose films are charred with atmospheric resonance, as stolid and uninspiring as “Public Enemies.” With pretensions to tell the epic tale of the FBI’s pursuit of an infamous Great Depression bank robber, this flat feature instead is an exercise in aloof filmmaking.

Strangely for a Mann production, the film, shot in high definition, has an unvarnished, scruffy appearance. Cinematographer Dante Spinotti – who so evocatively photographed the hardboiled 1950s crime milieu of “LA Confidential” — cannot capture the 1930s vibe with as much artistry because the movie suffers from a dim, muted visual style and the haphazard framing so common to the new technology. But the look of the film was apparently a conscious decision by Mann, who decided to forego 35mm film for the HD format and explained his reasoning as an attempt to accentuate intimacy.

“I shot in HD for a reason. My objective wasn’t to have people look at a period film. I wanted the audience to be involved in the film. I wanted it to feel like it had all the complexity of what it was like in that period of time.

“I didn’t want people to watch it from a distance. I wanted them to have an intimate connection to those times and for those times to have an impact on people.”

Even if the images created the connection that Mann sought – and they don’t; there’s a difference between close-up and intimate – the pictures couldn’t override a detached, thin story. And as besets an undeveloped biopic, the characters are examined peripherally. (The “warts and all” is predominantly physical, captured in high def.) Depp – an actor who seems to cast himself exclusively as unattached misfits and loners — plays Dillinger with variable consistency. He undoubtedly exudes charisma in the scenes where the shackled fugitive jokes with reporters in jail cells and on airport tarmacs but he lacks palpable presence when he is surrounded by his band of thieves or as he woos his paramour. It’s a stiff portrayal which doesn’t linger like the glistening magnesium flash-lamps of the hordes of photographers huddled on the courthouse steps. (Conversely John Ortiz provides memorable moments in the all-too-brief role of Phil D’Andrea, a well-connected Chicago hood who warns Dillinger that his front-page escapades could damage the burgeoning, behind-closed-doors gambling syndicates. In comparison, Dillinger is petty, overt and unsophisticated. It’s an intriguing subplot of two distinct approaches to crime but nothing more than a tangent. A film following the exploits of D’Andrea sounds quite appealing.)

The script by Mann, Ronan Bennett and Ann Biderman is too frequently padded with platitudes, especially in the exchanges between Dillinger and his girlfriend, Billie Frechette, played by the gamine (and game) Marion Cotillard. “Where are you going?” Billie asks. “Anywhere I want,” John replies. Later, during another tiff, John warns Billie, “Don’t kid a kidder.” She responds, “Don’t play me for a fool.”

Unassisted by trite dialogue, Depp is merely inconsistent and Cotillard underutilized, while Christian Bale as the phlegmatic Melvin Purvis, the bureau’s special agent overseeing the operation to capture Dillinger, is wooden. He doesn’t speak; he drones. If Bale was a no-name actor you’d think of this performance as inconsequential, at best. As special agent Charles Winstead, a subordinate of Purvis, Stephen Lang hands Bale a woodshed lesson in how to communicate, and thereby reveal character traits, with a clenched jaw. For a film with very few engaging characters, it receives some badly needed pep with the appearance of character actor Peter Gerety (a Ned Beatty clone in appearance and panache) as Dillinger’s theatrical lawyer, Louis Piquett.

When “Public Enemies” stages the final stakeout of Dillinger, G-Men lay in wait outside the Biograph Theater as he watches the screen flicker with images from 1934’s gangster flick, “Manhattan Melodrama”: Clark Gable is a tenacious presence spitting out gallows humor; a resolute William Powell is fraught with defiance; and the luminous, commanding Myrna Loy is shot beautifully by cinematographer James Wong Howe. Juxtaposed to the unremarkable “Public Enemies,” just those few brief glimpses from the W.S. Van Dyke directed classic show us what we’ve been missing.


The Ladykillers

A Movie for Mother’s Day

May 10th, 2009

ladykillers

Dear Mum,

I remember the first time we watched “The Ladykillers.”

For so long it was one of those Ealing Comedies you never expected to see on American television. But one day we happened upon it on the WGN schedule, and even though the copy was a bit worn, the brilliance of the 1955 comedy classic shone through.

Directed by Alexander Mackendrick, “The Ladykillers” is the perfectly executed caper of five bank robbers posing as a string quintet whose plans for an ingenious heist go horribly awry with the unwitting interference of their genteel landlady. I know that it has a special resonance for you because it captures a familiar street view of the post-war London of barrow boys and the last vestiges of rationing from your youth.

A story of exquisite simplicity chockfull of the screwball and the macabre, the film has haplessness and coincidence combining to conspire to foil the five. (As a bogus quintet they have to throw a record on the turntable, but in an inspired comic touch, they only have a single recording. For days afterwards, Boccherini’s Minuet burrows in as a melodious earworm.) The script by William Rose, who said that he visualized the entire plot in a single night’s dream, was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay.

The cast is tremendous. Alec Guinness slinks about as the thieves grotesque mastermind, Professor Marcus. The rest of the gang are a casting director‘s tour de force: Peter Sellers in his first breakout role as Harry, the jittery Teddy Boy; Danny Green as the kindhearted giant “One Round;” Herbert Lom as the oily, suspicious Louie; and Cecil Parker as urbane Major. But special mention must go to Katie Johnson as Mrs. Wilberforce. She reportedly was passed over initially for the part because of fears that she was too old and may not survive the filming. (A younger actress was cast; she died before filming commenced.) The film is buoyed by cameos from comedians such as Frankie Howerd and Kenneth Connor.

Two years later, Mackendrick directed the dark, atmospheric American classic “Sweet Smell of Success,“ which is especially laudable for James Wong Howe’s evocative black and white photography and penetrating performances from the formidable Burt Lancaster and the exquisite Tony Curtis. Amazingly, Mackendrick directed his last film in 1967. He left the industry, as Patricia Goldstone has written, after he “found himself spending more energy on making deals than on making films,” and taught filmmaking at the California Institute for the Arts for the next 25 years.

Since that first viewing we’ve seen “The Ladykillers” several times. Invariably, I’m grinning the whole way through, smiling in the moment while awaiting those particularly cherished scenes. Here is the original trailer for “The Ladykillers.” It doesn’t include our favorite line. (That’ll remain our oft-quoted joke.)

“The Ladykillers” is a great film and whenever I think about it I think about you and how much I love you.

Happy Mother’s Day,

Matthew