Public Enemies
July 17th, 2009

For a second time I sat through the two and a half hours of Michael Mann’s “Public Enemies.” And twice I’ve been disappointed. At a preview attended last December, the underwhelming biopic starring Johnny Depp as John Dillinger was an unenergetic, sullen, and tepid effort. But I thought it unfair to critique the film when this summer release could have been transformed, yet the intervening seven months have brought no discernible changes or judicious edits. It’s surprising to see, once again, a movie from a director whose films are charred with atmospheric resonance, as stolid and uninspiring as “Public Enemies.” With pretensions to tell the epic tale of the FBI’s pursuit of an infamous Great Depression bank robber, this flat feature instead is an exercise in aloof filmmaking.
Strangely for a Mann production, the film, shot in high definition, has an unvarnished, scruffy appearance. Cinematographer Dante Spinotti – who so evocatively photographed the hardboiled 1950s crime milieu of “LA Confidential” — cannot capture the 1930s vibe with as much artistry because the movie suffers from a dim, muted visual style and the haphazard framing so common to the new technology. But the look of the film was apparently a conscious decision by Mann, who decided to forego 35mm film for the HD format and explained his reasoning as an attempt to accentuate intimacy.
“I shot in HD for a reason. My objective wasn’t to have people look at a period film. I wanted the audience to be involved in the film. I wanted it to feel like it had all the complexity of what it was like in that period of time.
“I didn’t want people to watch it from a distance. I wanted them to have an intimate connection to those times and for those times to have an impact on people.”
Even if the images created the connection that Mann sought – and they don’t; there’s a difference between close-up and intimate – the pictures couldn’t override a detached, thin story. And as besets an undeveloped biopic, the characters are examined peripherally. (The “warts and all” is predominantly physical, captured in high def.) Depp – an actor who seems to cast himself exclusively as unattached misfits and loners — plays Dillinger with variable consistency. He undoubtedly exudes charisma in the scenes where the shackled fugitive jokes with reporters in jail cells and on airport tarmacs but he lacks palpable presence when he is surrounded by his band of thieves or as he woos his paramour. It’s a stiff portrayal which doesn’t linger like the glistening magnesium flash-lamps of the hordes of photographers huddled on the courthouse steps. (Conversely John Ortiz provides memorable moments in the all-too-brief role of Phil D’Andrea, a well-connected Chicago hood who warns Dillinger that his front-page escapades could damage the burgeoning, behind-closed-doors gambling syndicates. In comparison, Dillinger is petty, overt and unsophisticated. It’s an intriguing subplot of two distinct approaches to crime but nothing more than a tangent. A film following the exploits of D’Andrea sounds quite appealing.)
The script by Mann, Ronan Bennett and Ann Biderman is too frequently padded with platitudes, especially in the exchanges between Dillinger and his girlfriend, Billie Frechette, played by the gamine (and game) Marion Cotillard. “Where are you going?” Billie asks. “Anywhere I want,” John replies. Later, during another tiff, John warns Billie, “Don’t kid a kidder.” She responds, “Don’t play me for a fool.”
Unassisted by trite dialogue, Depp is merely inconsistent and Cotillard underutilized, while Christian Bale as the phlegmatic Melvin Purvis, the bureau’s special agent overseeing the operation to capture Dillinger, is wooden. He doesn’t speak; he drones. If Bale was a no-name actor you’d think of this performance as inconsequential, at best. As special agent Charles Winstead, a subordinate of Purvis, Stephen Lang hands Bale a woodshed lesson in how to communicate, and thereby reveal character traits, with a clenched jaw. For a film with very few engaging characters, it receives some badly needed pep with the appearance of character actor Peter Gerety (a Ned Beatty clone in appearance and panache) as Dillinger’s theatrical lawyer, Louis Piquett.
When “Public Enemies” stages the final stakeout of Dillinger, G-Men lay in wait outside the Biograph Theater as he watches the screen flicker with images from 1934’s gangster flick, “Manhattan Melodrama”: Clark Gable is a tenacious presence spitting out gallows humor; a resolute William Powell is fraught with defiance; and the luminous, commanding Myrna Loy is shot beautifully by cinematographer James Wong Howe. Juxtaposed to the unremarkable “Public Enemies,” just those few brief glimpses from the W.S. Van Dyke directed classic show us what we’ve been missing.
Posted in Public Enemies |
Tagged Christian Bale, Clark Gable, Dante Spinotti, James Wong Howe, John Ortiz, Johnny Depp, Manhattan Melodrama, Marion Cotillard, Michael Mann, Myrna Loy, Peter Gerety, Public Enemies, Ronan Bennett, Stephen Lang, W.S. Van Dyke, William Powell |
Comments (0)
Duplicity
May 1st, 2009

To those who lament the lack of movie stars in motion pictures, “Duplicity” offers solace.
Presently, Hollywood showcases actors of varying talents; what it doesn’t have on a consistent basis is silver screen icons. There are a plethora of good actors who hold our attention, surely, but far too many seem to favor self-indulgent and disconnected parts. Bankable names like Russell Crowe, Johnny Depp and Christian Bale choose roles where they almost exclusively portray loners, apparently finding comfort in their character’s insularity and by losing themselves in costumes, accents and affectations. Powerful but distant, their detachment makes them feel small and isolated. There are thespians, fine artisans such as Philip Seymour Hoffman or Hillary Swank, who, bluntly, just don‘t radiate that “It” quality. And we’re encumbered with another generation of headshot pretty, vacant line readers; while that may be no different than the age of the studio contracts, it doesn’t alter the perception that they are merely wisps of space. Animation and special effects have nudged out, if not supplanted in many instances, live actors, both the gifted and the rubbish.
Perhaps nowhere has this dearth of magnetism been more telling than in romanticism because those box-office behemoths are just too comfortable playing the emotionally unavailable. Has Crowe ever cuddled on-screen? Has Depp ever swept a paramour off her feet? Has Bale ever swooned? It seems they’re too laden with breast plates and scissor hands for a little slap and tickle. With A-List actresses summarily jilted, it’s left to foreign flicks like “Priceless” or independent films such as “Milk” or even animation to provide the spark. It is telling that “WALL-E” was one of 2008’s most meaningful expositions on intimacy. It’s gotten so desperate that it can’t be too long until lesser lights attempt a computer-generated romance; coming this autumn, “PS, CGI Love You.”
In “Duplicity,“ Julia Roberts and Clive Owen exemplify not only the essence of being a movie star; they show self-indulgent SAG sack superstars how to bring sexy back. In his follow-up to the fabulous “Michael Clayton,” director and writer Tony Gilroy returns to the rubric of corporate intrigue through a lighter prism with Roberts and Owen as CIA and MI6 operatives who become lovers, retire from government spying, and enter the nefarious domain of corporate espionage by working for competing cutthroat multinational cosmetics companies. A byzantine plot trundles in a circuitous route, leaping back and forth through the last six years, skipping across continents. And while the film never flags, the labyrinthine machinations deviate from what makes “Duplicity” so much fun: the unforced chemistry from two scintillating performers. Through all of the plot twists and story subterfuge, Roberts and Owen deliver performances that accrete seamlessly as they let fly with sharp, flirtatious repartee that harkens to an age when witty verbal jousts between besotted equals were commonplace.
Roberts radiates the supreme confidence of a Tinseltown pro in her turn as the Claire Stenwick. With a twinkle in her eye, she has a certain Rosalind Russell vibe when swatting away Owen‘s chat up lines, or feeding him one of her own. Owen cleans up quite nicely for this film. In recent years, he‘s carved out a terrific resume in such films as “Sin City,” “Children of Men” and “Shoot ‘Em Up,” where he carried a perpetual seven o‘clock shadow like it was a trusty six shooter. But with smooth, high cheekbones shading his face like a single bruise on an apple, a clean-shaven Owen generates a stellar comic technique as Ray Koval. Wearing button down shirts even when on vacation, he looks like the dapper stud in the Lancôme cologne ads. (Before this film, if he was being paid in scents, it would have been British Sterling.)
Gilroy casts the additional, secondary roles with astute choices. Tom Wilkinson is eerie disquiet as Howard Tully, the paranoid conglomerate CEO. Wilkinson is wickedly adept at finding the unnerving in a normal moment. As his rival, Richard Garsik, a snarling Paul Giamatti continues to construct the supporting actor as All-Star relief pitcher, a Mad Hungarian of frothy interjections and ruthless maliciousness. Further fine actors such as Denis O’Hare and Thomas McCarthy make up a notable “Michael Clayton” ensemble.
But “Duplicity” is best when focused on the pulchritudinous pair bonding with a terrific alchemy and it is this relationship which fomented my earlier (perhaps too) curmudgeonly rhetoric. Roberts and Owen simply provide a dwindling presence that makes going to movies so wondrous. Sometimes it’s just exhilarating to sit in a darkened theater watching movie stars.
Posted in Duplicity, Reviews, Reviews A-E |
Tagged Children of Men, Christian Bale, Clive Owen, Denis O'Hare, Duplicity, Film, Film Reviews, Hillary Swank, Johnny Depp, Julia Roberts, Michael Clayton, Milk, Movie Reviews, Movies, Paul Giamatti, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Rosalind Russell, Russell Crowe, Shoot 'Em Up, Sin City, Thomas McCarthy, Tom Wilkinson, Tony Gilroy, WALL-E |
Comments (0)