Posts Tagged ‘Malin Akerman’

 

Couples Retreat & The Invention of Lying

The Last Resort

October 16th, 2009

the-invention-of-lying
Thirteen years ago, when Vince Vaughn was all Adam’s apple and venomous verbal rattle, Trent, his hipster persona in “Swingers,” delivered a cautionary warning to his buddy and fellow fledgling actor, Mike, played by Jon Favreau.

“I don’t want you to be the guy in the PG-13 movie everyone’s really hoping makes it happen. I want you to be like the guy in the rated R movie, you know, the guy you’re not sure whether or not you like yet. You’re not sure where he’s coming from. Okay? You’re a bad man. You’re a bad man, Mikey. You’re a bad man, bad man.”

Reunited for the fourth time on screen since the iconic “Swingers,” they’ve descended with “Couples Retreat” into the sort of lazy, fatuous PG-13 movie Trent exhorted against. For most of this decade, it’s been a steady regression by Vaughn into a typecast mold of a snarky, lethargic caricature of his seminal “Swingers” role. Vaughn has settled into an onscreen deportment reminiscent of the average Joe on a Monday night CBS sitcom. Even when the movies are decent, you’re still left wondering where the exuberant presence went. Favreau, who is a much more interesting director (“Elf,” “Iron Man”) than actor, has morphed since his “Dinner for Five” phase into a physique resembling Kimbo Slice. It’s the duo of MIA and MMA — they used to be money; now they’re just getting paid.

Opening with a lively title sequence from Jarik Van Sluijs, with Bowie’s “Modern Love” bopping along to short bursts of old home movies and archival B-movie footage, this soft lob for the common megaplex quickly succumbs to a tepid script written by Vaughn, Favreau and Dana Fox. It’s a treatment so banal and humorless it’s conceivable it was thought up and scribbled down during a solitary weekend retreat. (Favreau, who wrote “Swingers,” should be particularly shamed.)

The strained, basic story is that an anal-retentive husband and wife on the verge of divorce (Jason Bateman and Kristen Bell) cajole three other couples in Buffalo to vacation at an exotic resort specializing in reinvigorating relationships. In a confounding scene, Bateman’s character, named Jason, snoops around Dave’s (Vaughn) house at midnight, tossing pebbles at the second-story bedroom window. Dave reaches into his nightstand, retrieves a handgun, loads a clip into it, and steps gingerly down his stairs, until Jason sets off the house alarm by opening an unlocked sliding door. Dave has his gun drawn on his friend Jason, and then the light comes on. Silly and hopelessly clichéd, but disconcerting and certainly never examined for all of its implications. The scene pointedly underscores how the film teeters unsteadily from attempts at comedy to poorly broaching subjects such as friendship and intimacy. The movie also doesn’t begin to explain how four couples from Buffalo – with barely seven day’s notice in the middle of winter — secure a week-long vacation in the South Pacific that was not a traditional holiday week. Without any intervening exposition, the couples are shown inexplicably docking at a pristine mountainous island, which is actually Bora Bora. “Welcome to Eden,” the staff heralds to the couples, and it appears to be a salutation which greeted the cast and crew as well. But don’t worry about continuity; it’s not long before we have the beauty described with a “screensaver” joke. “Couples Retreat” is hackneyed, disjointed storytelling in an ignominious feature film debut from director Peter Billingsley (Ralphie from “A Christmas Story.”).

The slyly witty Peter Serafinowicz plays the manager of the resort as Christopher Lee as Mr. Roarke, (It would have been fun to see his character enhanced; “Scaramanga, will you do the fandango?”) His biting delivery is undercut with a scene which unnecessarily ruptures logic. Three of the four couples are anticipating a week of frivolity but their plans are replaced with a rigorous schedule of counseling sessions and day-break exercise classes devised by the resort’s founder (the utterly professional Jean Reno). But why are they handed their itinerary booklets at dinner? Wouldn’t it have been simpler and more practical to have this document placed on the living room tables in their palatial rooms?

Despite a few decent lines, the movie’s main characters are unlikable, unformed or boring. Favreau and Kristin Davis are especially unappealing as the disconnected couple who have raised a teenaged daughter, blown off a marriage, and spend the trip on the make for younger, more desirable partners. A sequence where each is finagling for a more erotic massage in adjoining rooms is predictable and feeble. Malin Akerman plays the sitcom worthy role of hot wife to Vaughn’s regular dude. It was a stretch to call the limber Silk Spectre in “Watchmen” an actress; here, she recites every line with the emphasis of a kindergarten teacher. The rest of the cast don’t resonate, generally because there’s no real connection between the characters and the humor is perfunctory.

But “Couples Retreat” is graced by one genuine comic superlative. Every appearance by Salvadore, the amorous, good-natured yoga instructor, is hilarious. A Puerto Rican soap opera star and best-selling musician, Carlos Ponce is perhaps most recognizable for a season-long role on the WB’s “7th Heaven.” But this will become his signature role with a highlight reel of physical comedy. Salvadore struts with a mischievous grin in a Speedo hugging his chiseled body and dramatically flicks his stringy Romance novel cover boy hair. He wraps his frame around the stretched and posed bodies, both male and female, willfully dry humping his class. Ponce is an ebullient scene stealer before he’s even uttered a word; his cheeky smile a rare exhibition of merriment in the film.

Sadly, Salvadore is a supporting character so he surfaces only occasionally, while Vaughn predominates, never more frustratingly than in an overly-long boat sequence with a stupid shark attack in the island’s lagoon. The torpid scene seems stretched out merely so that Vaughn can spout like Vaughn, but he’s just a seashell of himself so it’s hollow, brusque and just bad, man. It may not be a low-water mark, but it begs the question, “How low can you go?”

For Ricky Gervais, the opposite may be true. With two smart, mature, and funny films in quick succession, he’s positioned himself as one of the leading practitioners of clever, adult comedy. After his tremendous portrayals in “The Office” and “Extras,” you wouldn’t have been surprised if he’d transferred his mordant comedic sensibility to his movies. However he’s developed a knack for noticeably lighter and fundamentally entertaining works which are still substantial. In David Koepp’s “Ghost Town,” he helps foment a 1950s throwback flair with Tea Leoni and Greg Kinnear. Directed and written by Gervais and Matthew Robinson, “The Invention of Lying” is similarly suffused with intellect, wit and belly laughs as one humble man inadvertently discovers dishonesty. Set in a modern-day community redolent with the ambiance of a New England college town, it’s a world where fibs don’t exist and deceit is unfathomable. There’s no feigning platitudes or insincerity. Unfettered by decorum, co-workers, waiters and even passersby spout out exactly what’s on their mind. Every conversation is brutally frank, making truth the world’s oldest confession.

Gervais stars as Mark Bellison a screenwriter for Lecture Films, a company specializing in the exposition of history; but not as re-enactments. Instead, in a world devoid of imagination, a camera simply films authoritative narrators such as Nathan Goldfrappe (a splendid Christopher Guest) sitting in chairs reciting bland copy. Lecture writers are designated centuries; the smug, sartorial Brad Kessler (a sneering Rob Lowe) has the 20th. Mark is lumbered with the 14th century; the Black Plague features prominently in his works.

Entirely by accident, and known only to him, the recently fired writer utters the first ever lie, to a bank teller. Initially, Mark’s skill is utilized in the most rudimentary of pursuits: money and women. But he seems more than enthralled by the prospect of his power than actually fulfilling his wishes, except when it comes to his unrequited love (a first-rate portrayal by Jennifer Garner). When he invents the afterlife in an attempt to calm his mother’s fears – and Gervais delivers a deeply moving performance in a genuinely touching scene — he’s overheard and his concept of heaven propagates. Acolytes camp out in front of his modest apartment building, quietly waiting for more information. Reluctantly, Mark delivers a tale to a world-wide audience which is an unmalicious satire of Christianity. As he divulges more edicts with the help of a facetious visual gag, the inquisitive gathering clamors for more details about everlasting eternity; there’s a succor borne every minute. “The Invention of Lying” is filled with the satiric underpinnings and dexterity of an Ealing comedy but not the full bloodedness. Both “The Invention of Lying” and “Couples Retreat” have happy endings. But only Gervais, in a bright and jocular film, has taken the care to earn it.


Watchmen & Coraline

All Hands on the Bad One

March 26th, 2009

coraline
I haven’t read a word or leafed a page of “Watchmen.“ This isn’t out of any contrarian strop. I can understand why folks become fervently obsessive with these works; I’m just not into the genre. But I don’t think it matters that I had no background with the books when I chose to see the ubiquitously hyped flick. Regardless of how lauded or important the source, a film exists as a completely separate artistic entity. One can argue that an acquaintance with the original inspiration helps with context but even this position is immaterial because a film must be viewed on its own merits. So I saw “Watchmen” with no preconceived notion and no specific expectation. But what is still surprising about the film based on the reverentially adored DC comic book series is how the transfer to the screen feels so pedestrian.

After a vibrantly choreographed fight sequence which culminates in the death of one of the Watchmen in 1985 and a vivid, slow-motion opening title sequence of flashbulbed World War II era photograph stills, the film settles into standard fare. The gist of the plot centers on a collection of formerly publicly vilified superheroes regrouping to solve the murder of their cohort, The Comedian (played by Robert Downey Jr. look-a-like Jeffrey Dean Morgan). There are themes aplenty; from the Cold War to imperialist capitalism to vigilantism, that a film with a more confident script and assured hand would have feasted on. But too often these critiques seem more like a suggestion than an examination.

The film carries a refreshing R rating, and it is admittedly a welcome change to view a multiplex cartoon blockbuster chockfull of cursing and nudity. But then, director Zack Snyder helmed “300,” a film which resembled an International Male catalogue with Tom of Finland serving as a wardrobe consultant. His 2006 box-office bonanza was asinine twaddle but its unflinching visual style was arresting and hardly spartan. “Watchmen” lacks the cohesive tone and the consistent visual dynamism of his predecessor. Too often, it takes a smoke (and mirrors) break. This is especially evident in a prison scene which is small, ordinary and unconvincing. If one was hoping to be swept into another world, then “Watchmen” disappoints.

One aspect of “Watchmen” that is most perturbing is the trite use of music. It‘s a soundtrack too familiar and too obvious. The decision to score a Vietnam battle scene with Wagner’s Ride of the Valkyries or play Simon and Garfunkel‘s “Sounds of Silence“ over a funeral falls flat, even if used ironically or plucked from the novel.

The cast delivers performances of variant quality. Patrick Wilson, a burgeoning notable American actor, plays Dan Dreiberg, the most contemplative and openly vulnerable of the superheroes, with a believable poignancy while he exudes a Batman-like swagger as his alter ego, Nite Owl. Rorschach, played earnestly by Jackie Earle Haley as though Danny Bonaduce was a member of Gwar, needs a chill pill or, at the very least, a Ricola.

But a few of the main characterizations are less convincing. As Silk Spectre, Malin Akerman looks like Xena’s little sister, with limbs like an Incredible, but her acting is hardly malleable. Topped by a Spandau Ballet haircut, Matthew Goode, so brooding in “The Lookout,” is a stilted Adrian Veidt, the former superhero Ozymandias who has become the wealthiest man. And Billy Crudup’s Dr. Manhattan is annoyingly omniscient as he delivers every line like a stilted pontification. It doesn‘t help that in his CGI’d getup he regularly plods around with his tadger out so that he looks like a particularly horny Blue Man Groupie.

So, “Watchmen” is not a terrible film but perhaps in its own way this is a worse fate: not kitschy enough to merit midnight madness and not poor enough to be hokum; it’s just ho-hum.

As uninspiring as “Watchmen” is, with a budget that exceeds its grasp of magical moviemaking, it’s a treat to behold the vision of Henry Selick in “Coraline.” The director of stop-motion animation gems such as “The Nightmare Before Christmas” and “James and the Giant Peach,” Selick and his hearty crew have fashioned a meticulous work drawn from the Neil Gaiman novella, which I haven‘t read either.

The tale of Coraline, an intrepid young girl, voiced by Dakota Fanning, who discovers an alternate universe within the walls of her new home, is a precise, precious and ornate 3-D feast. She has moved with her family from Pontiac, Michigan to the remote Northwest so that her author parents can write untroubled by distractions. But even in these secluded surroundings, her mother and father (Teri Hatcher and John Hodgman) indelicately indicate that their only child, who is simply a kid being an inquisitive kid, is a bit of a bother. Sporting a look that suggests she started listening to Sleater-Kinney at a precociously young age, Coraline discovers a nook in a wall of their Victorian rental which leads to a passageway where her “other” parents, now doting and not distracted, lavish her with fanciful foods and presents. Their buttons for eyes are the first, most visible sign that their devotion may come with a price.

In her new environs, Coraline lives amongst notably surreal characters, especially the neighbors who live in the adjacent apartments of the massive house. Two eccentric actresses, Miss Spink and Miss Forcible, bursting out from the top of their corsets and fawning over their pampered Scotties, entertain her with their almost indecipherable bickering, the interplay enhanced by the vocals of comedy duo Dawn French and Jennifer Saunders. In the alternate universe, they are transformed into cheeky mermaids in an uproarious scene perhaps more readily relished by adults. She also encounters Mister Bobinsky, a gymnastics performer of mind-boggling dexterity voiced with gusto by the mellifluously throated Ian McShane. Bobinsky is the ringmaster for a mice circus which performs a rousingly choreographed drill team song for the young girl. Coraline is befriended in both worlds by a wise black cat voiced by the honey dripped tone of Keith David.

The film is a stunning and exceedingly attractive achievement, enhanced by 3-D but not beholden to it. A kooky kaleidoscope of a garden is a shimmering blancmange of reds, oranges and blues. It’s also filled with beautiful, simple touches — the crystalline texture of snow, a shifting rug under Coraline‘s feet or tea leaves swishing in a cup are visual delights made all the more wondrous by the knowledge that these moments were created by the patient, hands-on care of artisans minutely shifting figures. Buoyed by Bruno Coulais’ soundtrack of jaunty harp music, the film is steadfastly clever while alternately and, in many instances, simultaneously creepy and funny. “Coraline” is an enchanting triumph.