Posts Tagged ‘Ricky Gervais’

 

Couples Retreat & The Invention of Lying

The Last Resort

October 16th, 2009

the-invention-of-lying
Thirteen years ago, when Vince Vaughn was all Adam’s apple and venomous verbal rattle, Trent, his hipster persona in “Swingers,” delivered a cautionary warning to his buddy and fellow fledgling actor, Mike, played by Jon Favreau.

“I don’t want you to be the guy in the PG-13 movie everyone’s really hoping makes it happen. I want you to be like the guy in the rated R movie, you know, the guy you’re not sure whether or not you like yet. You’re not sure where he’s coming from. Okay? You’re a bad man. You’re a bad man, Mikey. You’re a bad man, bad man.”

Reunited for the fourth time on screen since the iconic “Swingers,” they’ve descended with “Couples Retreat” into the sort of lazy, fatuous PG-13 movie Trent exhorted against. For most of this decade, it’s been a steady regression by Vaughn into a typecast mold of a snarky, lethargic caricature of his seminal “Swingers” role. Vaughn has settled into an onscreen deportment reminiscent of the average Joe on a Monday night CBS sitcom. Even when the movies are decent, you’re still left wondering where the exuberant presence went. Favreau, who is a much more interesting director (“Elf,” “Iron Man”) than actor, has morphed since his “Dinner for Five” phase into a physique resembling Kimbo Slice. It’s the duo of MIA and MMA — they used to be money; now they’re just getting paid.

Opening with a lively title sequence from Jarik Van Sluijs, with Bowie’s “Modern Love” bopping along to short bursts of old home movies and archival B-movie footage, this soft lob for the common megaplex quickly succumbs to a tepid script written by Vaughn, Favreau and Dana Fox. It’s a treatment so banal and humorless it’s conceivable it was thought up and scribbled down during a solitary weekend retreat. (Favreau, who wrote “Swingers,” should be particularly shamed.)

The strained, basic story is that an anal-retentive husband and wife on the verge of divorce (Jason Bateman and Kristen Bell) cajole three other couples in Buffalo to vacation at an exotic resort specializing in reinvigorating relationships. In a confounding scene, Bateman’s character, named Jason, snoops around Dave’s (Vaughn) house at midnight, tossing pebbles at the second-story bedroom window. Dave reaches into his nightstand, retrieves a handgun, loads a clip into it, and steps gingerly down his stairs, until Jason sets off the house alarm by opening an unlocked sliding door. Dave has his gun drawn on his friend Jason, and then the light comes on. Silly and hopelessly clichéd, but disconcerting and certainly never examined for all of its implications. The scene pointedly underscores how the film teeters unsteadily from attempts at comedy to poorly broaching subjects such as friendship and intimacy. The movie also doesn’t begin to explain how four couples from Buffalo – with barely seven day’s notice in the middle of winter — secure a week-long vacation in the South Pacific that was not a traditional holiday week. Without any intervening exposition, the couples are shown inexplicably docking at a pristine mountainous island, which is actually Bora Bora. “Welcome to Eden,” the staff heralds to the couples, and it appears to be a salutation which greeted the cast and crew as well. But don’t worry about continuity; it’s not long before we have the beauty described with a “screensaver” joke. “Couples Retreat” is hackneyed, disjointed storytelling in an ignominious feature film debut from director Peter Billingsley (Ralphie from “A Christmas Story.”).

The slyly witty Peter Serafinowicz plays the manager of the resort as Christopher Lee as Mr. Roarke, (It would have been fun to see his character enhanced; “Scaramanga, will you do the fandango?”) His biting delivery is undercut with a scene which unnecessarily ruptures logic. Three of the four couples are anticipating a week of frivolity but their plans are replaced with a rigorous schedule of counseling sessions and day-break exercise classes devised by the resort’s founder (the utterly professional Jean Reno). But why are they handed their itinerary booklets at dinner? Wouldn’t it have been simpler and more practical to have this document placed on the living room tables in their palatial rooms?

Despite a few decent lines, the movie’s main characters are unlikable, unformed or boring. Favreau and Kristin Davis are especially unappealing as the disconnected couple who have raised a teenaged daughter, blown off a marriage, and spend the trip on the make for younger, more desirable partners. A sequence where each is finagling for a more erotic massage in adjoining rooms is predictable and feeble. Malin Akerman plays the sitcom worthy role of hot wife to Vaughn’s regular dude. It was a stretch to call the limber Silk Spectre in “Watchmen” an actress; here, she recites every line with the emphasis of a kindergarten teacher. The rest of the cast don’t resonate, generally because there’s no real connection between the characters and the humor is perfunctory.

But “Couples Retreat” is graced by one genuine comic superlative. Every appearance by Salvadore, the amorous, good-natured yoga instructor, is hilarious. A Puerto Rican soap opera star and best-selling musician, Carlos Ponce is perhaps most recognizable for a season-long role on the WB’s “7th Heaven.” But this will become his signature role with a highlight reel of physical comedy. Salvadore struts with a mischievous grin in a Speedo hugging his chiseled body and dramatically flicks his stringy Romance novel cover boy hair. He wraps his frame around the stretched and posed bodies, both male and female, willfully dry humping his class. Ponce is an ebullient scene stealer before he’s even uttered a word; his cheeky smile a rare exhibition of merriment in the film.

Sadly, Salvadore is a supporting character so he surfaces only occasionally, while Vaughn predominates, never more frustratingly than in an overly-long boat sequence with a stupid shark attack in the island’s lagoon. The torpid scene seems stretched out merely so that Vaughn can spout like Vaughn, but he’s just a seashell of himself so it’s hollow, brusque and just bad, man. It may not be a low-water mark, but it begs the question, “How low can you go?”

For Ricky Gervais, the opposite may be true. With two smart, mature, and funny films in quick succession, he’s positioned himself as one of the leading practitioners of clever, adult comedy. After his tremendous portrayals in “The Office” and “Extras,” you wouldn’t have been surprised if he’d transferred his mordant comedic sensibility to his movies. However he’s developed a knack for noticeably lighter and fundamentally entertaining works which are still substantial. In David Koepp’s “Ghost Town,” he helps foment a 1950s throwback flair with Tea Leoni and Greg Kinnear. Directed and written by Gervais and Matthew Robinson, “The Invention of Lying” is similarly suffused with intellect, wit and belly laughs as one humble man inadvertently discovers dishonesty. Set in a modern-day community redolent with the ambiance of a New England college town, it’s a world where fibs don’t exist and deceit is unfathomable. There’s no feigning platitudes or insincerity. Unfettered by decorum, co-workers, waiters and even passersby spout out exactly what’s on their mind. Every conversation is brutally frank, making truth the world’s oldest confession.

Gervais stars as Mark Bellison a screenwriter for Lecture Films, a company specializing in the exposition of history; but not as re-enactments. Instead, in a world devoid of imagination, a camera simply films authoritative narrators such as Nathan Goldfrappe (a splendid Christopher Guest) sitting in chairs reciting bland copy. Lecture writers are designated centuries; the smug, sartorial Brad Kessler (a sneering Rob Lowe) has the 20th. Mark is lumbered with the 14th century; the Black Plague features prominently in his works.

Entirely by accident, and known only to him, the recently fired writer utters the first ever lie, to a bank teller. Initially, Mark’s skill is utilized in the most rudimentary of pursuits: money and women. But he seems more than enthralled by the prospect of his power than actually fulfilling his wishes, except when it comes to his unrequited love (a first-rate portrayal by Jennifer Garner). When he invents the afterlife in an attempt to calm his mother’s fears – and Gervais delivers a deeply moving performance in a genuinely touching scene — he’s overheard and his concept of heaven propagates. Acolytes camp out in front of his modest apartment building, quietly waiting for more information. Reluctantly, Mark delivers a tale to a world-wide audience which is an unmalicious satire of Christianity. As he divulges more edicts with the help of a facetious visual gag, the inquisitive gathering clamors for more details about everlasting eternity; there’s a succor borne every minute. “The Invention of Lying” is filled with the satiric underpinnings and dexterity of an Ealing comedy but not the full bloodedness. Both “The Invention of Lying” and “Couples Retreat” have happy endings. But only Gervais, in a bright and jocular film, has taken the care to earn it.


April 3rd, 2009

If James Bond’s erection lasts more than four hours, should he consult Dr. No? Scott Murray takes readers In Bed With Bond in his heartily researched examination of 007’s sexual proclivities and conquests in the online film journal, Senses of Cinema.

Ricky Gervais and Elmo: Together at Last

Magnolia Pictures will release Sundance Film Festival fave “Humpday” this summer. Karina Longworth of SpoutBlog chatted with writer/director Lynn Shelton about the “bromantic comedy” with the tantalizing tagline that “Sometimes male bonding can be taken a little too far.”

The world’s most delicious comic provocateur will arrive in theaters in July. Behold the Bruno trailer, from the folks at Trailer Addict.

One Film Wonder: And one of the most auspicious first film cameos in Hollywood history. A 17-year-old Joy Page, the step-daughter of Warner Bros. chief Jack Warner, shimmers with earnest intensity as Annina Brandel, a newlywed with a most bedeviling dilemma in “Casablanca.” The quality of the clip improves quickly, highlighting both Page’s mature portrayal and Humphrey Bogart’s beautiful subtlety.


Hamlet 2

Jesus Christ Stuporstar

October 16th, 2008

hamlet21-1
Steve Coogan has created, since the mid 1990s, some of the most inedible comic mischiefs in British television.  From the unctuous Alan Partridge, a passive aggressive, Abba-obsessed chat show host who dangles on a tightrope between obsequiousness and open loathing for his guests to Tommy Saxondale, a former classic-rock band roadie turned grimaced exterminator who constantly spits exasperated vitriol through gritted teeth, he has become a foremost practitioner of cringe comedy.

Like John Cleese with Basil Fawlty and Ricky Gervais with David Brent, Coogan has the ability to make nutters connectible, substantial and if not likable, then, at least, not rooted against.  However, his movie career, so far, has failed to furnish him with a signature comic persona to compare to his TV titans.  It’s not to say that he hasn’t showcased stellar performances as a film actor.  He delivered a confident portrayal of music impresario Tony Wilson in  Michael Winterbottom’s “24 Hour Party People,“ offered a sharply entertaining turn as a tart-tongued actor in Winterbottom’s “Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story” and exuded laid back poignancy teamed with Alfred Molina in Jim Jarmusch’s “Coffee and Cigarettes.”  

But these portrayals haven’t required the comic largesse he possesses.  From such a captivating comedian who is a masterful mimic as well — instead of another Sean Connery, he delivers a pitch-perfect Roger Moore — we await a riveting big screen presence, a task, so far, clearly beyond the grasp of his Hollywood ventures as well. In these films, it is a bleak resume of generally unremarkable parts such as Phileas Fogg in the unpleasant and thoroughly unnecessary remake of “Around the World in 80 Days,” Octavius in the underwhelming “Night at the Museum” and as the ill-fated but unmemorable director in “Tropic Thunder.“  In his stateside ventures, Coogan appears neutered; he’s cast in parts hardly requiring his specific, formidable talent.

So with the strong buzz emanating from the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year for “Hamlet 2,” his role as Dana Marschz, a forlorn Tucson high school drama teacher, seemed like an epiphanic moment. Unfortunately, while the role begins to capture the inventiveness of Coogan, the mercurial film directed by Andrew Fleming and co-written by Fleming and Pam Brady is a disappointment. 

“Hamlet 2” is book ended by a very nifty beginning and a sensational final reel with a musical that is roaringly funny, clever, inspired and profane. Songs such as “Rock Me, Sexy Jesus” “You’re as Gay as the Day is Long and “Raped in the Face” are wincingly catchy.  But the invention can’t disguise a gooey, unformed center, underscored by classroom scenes which feel dated and comedically rote.  The throng of Hispanic students transferred into his acting class of two sycophants is stuffed into stereotypes without sending them up successfully.  The unruly students, who we know will undergo a metamorphosis  from cynics to thespians, are the focus of an unfunny parody which feels like “Stand and Deliver Lines.”

Marschz is introduced by bouts of physical humor, funny at first but too broad by far, so that when he roller skates to school, he skates so badly he holds up traffic in a pantomime way.  The scene overplays the absurdity, like the moment where he arrives to class wearing a kaftan, without underpants, and slips and flips over.  He is odd, full stop.  He’s too silly, too distant to become the transformative influence the incorrigible class and plot requires.  There’s no depth to his character.  He is made so hapless that the final completed and complicated musical numbers of this sequel to Hamlet seem well beyond him.

A scene where Dana visits a student’s begrudging parents underlines his disconnect.  The father (Marco Rodriguez in a meaty cameo) is a university scholar, of literature, who can’t abide the concept that someone, especially a teacher, would deign to make a sequel to Hamlet.  It could have been an interesting and funny discussion.  But Coogan’s character doesn’t connect with the father intellectually and instead physical humor bosses the moment.  If the musical had been penned by the father, then, yes, it would seem plausible but Dana lacks the dexterity, depth and panache to author this work.

Sadly, the plot becomes enamored with a tiresome “Will they be able to put the play on?” dilemma as the school administration intervenes against the material.  The film is lumbered with a berating, drill sergeant of a principal (Marshall Bell) and a haughty ACLU attorney (Amy Poehler).  A more interesting and engaging comedy would have sidestepped the heavy-handedness and one-note tenor of the antagonists and simply asked the question, “How did the play come together?”

Likewise, a subplot involving his wife (Catherine Keener, aptly cast as a harridan) seems overbearing and tangential.  (Again, because of the lack of connection, you’re left pondering how they ever hooked up in the first place.)  It’s piling on a pathetic character and just ends up feeling mean.  “Hamlet 2” lacks the tenderness of a film like “Little Miss Sunshine,“ which leavened the eccentricity of the characters with genuine affection for each other.  It doesn’t mean the film melted into mush; it just got real and human.  Steve Coogan can play real humans, real funny.  We’re just still waiting to see it on the big screen.