Posts Tagged ‘Sin City’

 

Duplicity

Seeing Stars

May 1st, 2009

duplicity-movie-15
To those who lament the lack of movie stars in motion pictures, “Duplicity” offers solace.

Presently, Hollywood showcases actors of varying talents; what it doesn’t have on a consistent basis is silver screen icons. There are a plethora of good actors who hold our attention, surely, but far too many seem to favor self-indulgent and disconnected parts. Bankable names like Russell Crowe, Johnny Depp and Christian Bale choose roles where they almost exclusively portray loners, apparently finding comfort in their character’s insularity and by losing themselves in costumes, accents and affectations. Powerful but distant, their detachment makes them feel small and isolated. There are thespians, fine artisans such as Philip Seymour Hoffman or Hillary Swank, who, bluntly, just don‘t radiate that “It” quality. And we’re encumbered with another generation of headshot pretty, vacant line readers; while that may be no different than the age of the studio contracts, it doesn’t alter the perception that they are merely wisps of space. Animation and special effects have nudged out, if not supplanted in many instances, live actors, both the gifted and the rubbish.

Perhaps nowhere has this dearth of magnetism been more telling than in romanticism because those box-office behemoths are just too comfortable playing the emotionally unavailable. Has Crowe ever cuddled on-screen? Has Depp ever swept a paramour off her feet? Has Bale ever swooned? It seems they’re too laden with breast plates and scissor hands for a little slap and tickle. With A-List actresses summarily jilted, it’s left to foreign flicks like “Priceless” or independent films such as “Milk” or even animation to provide the spark. It is telling that “WALL-E” was one of 2008’s most meaningful expositions on intimacy. It’s gotten so desperate that it can’t be too long until lesser lights attempt a computer-generated romance; coming this autumn, “PS, CGI Love You.”

In “Duplicity,“ Julia Roberts and Clive Owen exemplify not only the essence of being a movie star; they show self-indulgent SAG sack superstars how to bring sexy back. In his follow-up to the fabulous “Michael Clayton,” director and writer Tony Gilroy returns to the rubric of corporate intrigue through a lighter prism with Roberts and Owen as CIA and MI6 operatives who become lovers, retire from government spying, and enter the nefarious domain of corporate espionage by working for competing cutthroat multinational cosmetics companies. A byzantine plot trundles in a circuitous route, leaping back and forth through the last six years, skipping across continents. And while the film never flags, the labyrinthine machinations deviate from what makes “Duplicity” so much fun: the unforced chemistry from two scintillating performers. Through all of the plot twists and story subterfuge, Roberts and Owen deliver performances that accrete seamlessly as they let fly with sharp, flirtatious repartee that harkens to an age when witty verbal jousts between besotted equals were commonplace.

Roberts radiates the supreme confidence of a Tinseltown pro in her turn as the Claire Stenwick. With a twinkle in her eye, she has a certain Rosalind Russell vibe when swatting away Owen‘s chat up lines, or feeding him one of her own. Owen cleans up quite nicely for this film. In recent years, he‘s carved out a terrific resume in such films as “Sin City,” “Children of Men” and “Shoot ‘Em Up,” where he carried a perpetual seven o‘clock shadow like it was a trusty six shooter. But with smooth, high cheekbones shading his face like a single bruise on an apple, a clean-shaven Owen generates a stellar comic technique as Ray Koval. Wearing button down shirts even when on vacation, he looks like the dapper stud in the Lancôme cologne ads. (Before this film, if he was being paid in scents, it would have been British Sterling.)

Gilroy casts the additional, secondary roles with astute choices. Tom Wilkinson is eerie disquiet as Howard Tully, the paranoid conglomerate CEO. Wilkinson is wickedly adept at finding the unnerving in a normal moment. As his rival, Richard Garsik, a snarling Paul Giamatti continues to construct the supporting actor as All-Star relief pitcher, a Mad Hungarian of frothy interjections and ruthless maliciousness. Further fine actors such as Denis O’Hare and Thomas McCarthy make up a notable “Michael Clayton” ensemble.

But “Duplicity” is best when focused on the pulchritudinous pair bonding with a terrific alchemy and it is this relationship which fomented my earlier (perhaps too) curmudgeonly rhetoric. Roberts and Owen simply provide a dwindling presence that makes going to movies so wondrous. Sometimes it’s just exhilarating to sit in a darkened theater watching movie stars.


The Wrestler

Out of the Cellar

March 14th, 2009

rourke_lo
It’s good to have Mickey Rourke back.

The best actor whose career was born in the 80s seemed lost to us. By the close of that decade, he had amassed a stellar resume which promised his ascension into the 1990s as the most vital leading man of his generation, and then he was gone, vanished from prominence, vanquished by his demons.

His resume in the 1980s has only grown in stature since. In the wondrous “Diner” and evocative “Rumble Fish,” he was a man among boys. In “The Pope of Greenwich Village” he let Eric Roberts concoct fidgety affectations while he simmered with a succulent slow burn. The versatile Rourke could play Charles Bukowski and a lothario with equal credibility. And he went toe-to-toe with a prime De Niro in “Angel Heart” giving the devil as good as he got.

But even then he seemed like a throwback. Blessed with the tumescent presence of Robert Mitchum yet the fragile vulnerability of Montgomery Clift, Rourke was the quietest big presence on the silver screen. He was the New Romantic Brando.

Yet, despite this talent meshed with charisma, no actor of any significance became a non-entity for longer. It was only 10 years between “Mutiny on the Bounty” and “The Godfather” for Marlon Brando. And while it seemed that John Travolta was an outcast longer than he was, in those 14 years between “Urban Cowboy” and “Pulp Fiction,” he still persisted with boffo box-office numbers in the “Look Who’s Talking” flicks. When an actor generally enters the wilderness — say a Ryan O’Neal or Michael Keaton – typically its a self-imposed retirement or the lack of acting pedigree catching up to them.

Three years ago, Rourke reappeared in “Sin City” as Marv, the gentle humungous, and while he exuded his signature pathos, Marv was a green screened creation in an ensemble piece. But here, as Randy ‘The Ram’ Robinson, a former wrestling superstar toiling in a northeastern minor-league circuit, it’s Mickey in flesh and blood. Randy pines for his glory days in the 1980s when arenas (both wrestling and rock) were his temple. Now, he performs (with good grace) to dozens perched in rec center folding chairs in matches he crams around his schedule hoisting goods at a local supermarket.

It’s astonishing to see Rourke in his leotard sporting a ripped upper body with a hulking chest, guns protruding from his shoulders and, most disconcertingly, a face brutalized by boxing, by Botox, or maybe almost two decades of bad choices. However, despite his massive body, or perhaps because of it, one is drawn to his hands which, like his voice — that unmistakable husky whisper — are strong but capped with fingernails hearty and delicate, like finely sliced almond.

Rourke exudes a quiet, understated strength early in the film, especially in the genuine camaraderie he shares with his younger, fellow wrestlers. The backstage scenes are casual, heartfelt, and touching as they express respect and reverence for the “Ram,” which he accepts with gracious reluctance

“The Wrestler” is an imperfect film as it charts Randy’s hopes for a comeback. Marisa Tomei is a top notch actress, and she excels at what she does in this movie, but the part of Cassidy, a stripper who Randy befriends, feels incomplete. Similarly, Randy’s attempts to reconcile with his estranged daughter, played defiantly by Evan Rachel Wood, seem slung together. And the characterization presented of Todd Barry’s harrying boss is a tad too dickish.

But perhaps what most blights “The Wrestler” is what makes it most riveting. The film is overpowered by Mickey Rourke’s presence. It’s hard to watch the movie and not constantly gawk at his performance. It’s head-shakingly amazing to realize that Rourke was 55 during the filming. To give this feat some perspective, Brando was 47 when he returned to play the burnt-out, cynical Paul in “Last Tango in Paris.” This feeling of wonder isn’t just in the first few scenes; it permeates every shot. But if his performance puts the film in a stranglehold, perhaps this is to be expected from a movie so saturated in the irony of seeing an 80s wrestling superstar pining for a career resurrection played by an 80s icon who is delivering one.

This film was clearly built around Rourke and for this the credit must go to director Darren Aronofsky, who insisted, ultimately, that Rourke was the logical choice for the role. The widely circulated story states that Aronofsky first offered the part to Nicolas Cage but had second thoughts almost immediately so that we were spared the absurdity of Cage, who one feels currently doesn’t have either the girth or the chops to handle a stripped-bare part like “The Ram.” Why expose an audience to a spandexed, steel Caged-match when you have a national treasure like Rourke?

Aronofsky shows admirable versatility by shooting “The Wrestler” in a gritty, unadorned style so unlike his last effort, “The Fountain,” an ornate, existential exercise replete with Hugh Jackman as a bark eating monk. It was overstuffed with video techniques, celestial imagery and a cluttered metaphysical vibe. He presents this film with a hand-held intimacy and a washed-out color palette, the visual style matching a main performance savagely raw and real. In a movie shorn of the abstract, perhaps it’s fitting that when Randy, enjoying a beer in a tavern with Cassidy, hears a favorite song, it instantly creases his battered face with a knowing grin as the 80s classic sums up not only the hope of “The Ram” but the rebirth of Rourke.

Round and round
With love we’ll find a way just give it time, time, time, time
Round and Round
What comes around goes around
I’ll tell you why, why, why, why