Posts Tagged ‘The Lookout’

 

A Single Man

True Loves Leaves A Trace

April 12th, 2010

a_single_man
The plaintive violins and robust trombones in the last four measures of Jean Sibelius’ Seventh Symphony, his final symphony, a symphony of one unbreakable movement, surge and undulate until a conclusion — described by musical theorist Arnold Whittall as “triumphantly abrupt” – in which the music not as much ends but ceases into lingering nothingness.

Everyone has a soundtrack for grief. That is mine. But that’s in the abstract. In reality, we likely don’t want to hear a thing while we mourn, we don’t wish to be reminded of the loss by a melody. George Falconer – the newly single man of Christopher Isherwood’s evocative novel and Tom Ford’s touching debut motion picture – can’t pick up an album in his Los Angeles home without freezing from the instantaneously heartbreaking memory of Jim. It’s November 1962, and only eight months have passed since the death of his partner of 16 years on a snowy Colorado road. He puts the album down; there are no revolutions for the phonograph yet. At the most recent weekly dinner with his longtime friend Charley — a fellow expatriate and the woman who consoled him on the evening he received the tragic news — George (Colin Firth) resolves to abide by an early New Year’s Resolution to simply “let go of the past.” So when he dances, he moves to the present. George and Charley gyrate in her opulent living room to Green Onions, released in August of 1962 and therefore debuting after his partner’s death so there’s no chance the song can provoke the past.

Still, George mourns. He finds himself prying his body out of bed in the morning. Unenthused, as his feet hit the floor, he falls into the routine of readying himself for teaching college literature. An Englishman, with a home on the West Coast for close to a quarter century, the sartorially splendid George armors himself with professorial effect. He has become, in the past months, a mannequin of tearless grief, and cloaked despondency inside. At the college, he walks across campus with a colleague (Pushing Daisies’ Lee Pace), engaged in a conversation but only peripherally as he focuses on the alluring bodies of two toned student tennis players. George has become a match of intellect versus sensation, a battle between the temporal and the everlasting. In his classroom, he lets the class prattle on about the themes of immortality in Aldous Huxley’s After Many a Summer Dies the Swan as he remains distracted by, well, everything. One student, Kenny, who remains quiet during the discussion, intrigues George (and unknowingly comforts him) when after class he confides in George that he’s naturally uncertain, befuddled by the past, present and future. Kenny (portrayed very nicely by Nicholas Hoult, who’s grown into a young actor of significance since his About a Boy appearance) is earnest and grasping but not desperate or clingy. His genuine discombobulation parallels George’s palpable sense of upheaval.

Jim remains a potent presence throughout the film. In flashback, Matthew Goode is warm, generous and gorgeous as Jim. Goode, who was so majestic in the sadly little-seen The Lookout and so misused in the bombastic Watchmen, is technically remarkable with his true accent undetectable in his American one. But what makes Goode such a strong actor is his effortless versatility. He’s endowed with the dashing good looks to play heartthrobs and possesses the talent to play darker, more complex characters. In A Single Man, despite a supporting role, he conveys the depth of devotion he felt for George, and makes one fully realize how much these men loved each other.

Photographed in cool light and swathed in diffuse colors, A Single Man is filmed at times as though through a finely shrouded gauze. The secluded, tree-shaded, open-floor planned modern home that George now shares with no one is accentuated with rosewood and teak. There’s a tenderness and consideration to the visual style Ford gives this tinted California, and his graceful direction – where he combines the perpetual-sunset veneer with emotionally meaningful moments — is highlighted by a brief encounter. On the way to Charley’s for dinner, George stops at a liquor store and literally bumps into Carlos, by all appearances a hustler. The brief role is played by Jon Kortajarena, a Spanish model with cheekbones like the edges of a hollowed out butternut squash, in a fine film debut. Shot with a dramatic backdrop, the scene doesn’t play out as expected and the kind, sweet vibe of the sequence is significant given its brevity.

Once he arrives for supper and cocktails, and makes it through her hallway of orange plants which is less a foyer than a grove, George and the gregarious Charley engage in the easy banter and simultaneously unrestrained personal condemnations of confidants. Verbal jabs, both those planned and those unintentionally landed and instantly apologized for, can be shared and absorbed between really good, seasoned friends. Julianne Moore, a marmalade minx decidedly less frumpy than her novel counterpart but no less sad, emotes her self pity with a forced laugh and an impeccably unforced English accent. She and Firth engage in illuminating abreactions and the script by Ford and co-writer David Scearce here crackles with witty, charged and substantial dialogue.

Later that same night, at the same bar where he first met Jim, but now a far different watering hole two decades on, George runs into Kenny for a drink. Kenny, who doesn’t know anything specifically about George’s loss, wonders if his teacher has learned anything from life’s experiences. George thinks, perhaps he hasn’t, and that he’s just become “sillier and sillier” It is in these scenes where Firth allows George, without forced alterations to the character, to let down his guard, even more so than he’d imagine with Charley. Vitally, Firth connects us to George’s attempts at catharsis. Both the novel and the film poignantly convey the common experience of mourning. We all fear death, and are connected by our collective dread at its inexorable presence and its irreversible legacy. But our grief is ours, alone.


(500) Days of Summer

I Want the One I Can’t Have

August 21st, 2009

500_days_of_summer
It’s in an elevator that Tom knows Summer is the one.

As they ascend to the office of the greeting card company where they both work, Tom Hansen (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) nonchalantly bops along to The Smiths’ jaunty, jangly “There is a Light That Never Goes Out” gently escaping from his earbuds. Summer Finn (Zooey Deschanel) is new to the office but has been noticed by anyone attracted to a fetching fringe, including Tom, who’s besotted at first sight. She hears the song, perks up, says how much she adores The Smiths, and begins to quietly, instinctually, sing along to one of his favorite bands. He’s thinking duets; she’s thinking, “Where did my copy of ‘Meat is Murder’ go?”

That’s because “(500) Days of Summer” has almost instantly let the viewer know in omniscient narration that he isn’t the one for her.

So The Smiths are like the houseband for the tone of the film. With a complex mélange of styles and emotions, their songs can be effervescently romantic and sly with an up-tempo rhythm section thumping out a sprightly beat; but then the tunes can become demonstrably maudlin as the guitar sidles around despairing, longing lyrics. If you’re mourning a relationship’s demise, an empathic Morrissey, simultaneously vulnerable and defiant, understands why you’re mewling at the rainy window pane. Director Marc Webb successfully chooses an intriguing storytelling device to capture the ever changing moods of Tom and Summer’s fated love affair that mimics the band’s spirit without taking on the full despondent histrionics of a Smiths track. Instead of a standard linear approach, Webb, who makes a fine feature-film debut, jumps in between days, capturing the undulations of the romantic to and fro, so that random days throughout the 500 of the relationship keep popping up. Just from the beginning, day 290 is followed by days 1, 3, 4, and 8, with a leap to day 154 and then back down to day 11. The back and forth isn’t dizzying. Webb and writers Scott Neustadter and Michael Weber nicely and understandably weave between the ecstasy of the earliest getting-to-know-yous and the anguish of a couple fraying into the past tense. And while Tom’s trauma crouches coiled with just-around-the-corner expectation, “(500) Days of Summer” is still a decidedly fanciful, funny and romantic film. Blessed with a sensational soundtrack which includes Mumm-Ra, Carla Bruni and The Pixies, the movie is sweetly crafted by moments such as an uproarious musical number choreographed to a Hall & Oates ditty, a “Seventh Seal” parody that executes a new laugh for an old gag, and a trip to IKEA which goofs on domesticity. Cinematographer Eric Steelberg drapes Los Angeles with a timeless, dreamy charm. The ageless vibe is accentuated when Tom, who owns a car, takes the train up the coast where he unexpectedly runs into Summer onboard. However, despite the marching bands, the clever Belle and Sebastian references and the slow dances at a co-worker’s reception, the bittersweet is never too far removed; day 34 is grafted right next to day 303.

But, quite frankly, “(500) Days” is also an opportunity for the best American actor under the age of 30 to excel in expanding his repertoire, and, hopefully, his following. An industry veteran since childhood, Gordon-Levitt found fame in the 1990s as the precocious Tommy Solomon on “3rd Rock from the Sun” and the smitten Cameron in “10 Things I Hate about You.” But then the Californian put his career on hiatus, set off to New York, and enrolled at Columbia. He returned to Los Angeles grown up and invigorated, conscientiously taking on complex roles with a ferocious zeal, as though he spent his days back East sitting in Washington Square Park reading Baudelaire, listening to Bad Brains. It’s a resume of small budgets and vast rewards; with “Mysterious Skin,” “Brick,” “The Lookout,” and now “(500) Days” he’s put together one of the most impressive catalogues of perceptive performances this decade.

Too damaged to be cute, and too disinterested in a personal trainer to be a hunk, Gordon-Levitt is his own construal of handsome. He has a naturally saturnine face with wounded eyes that can thin easily into cynical slits and a tight mouth gifted for emoting melancholy. He has the presence of being young and old at once, and in “(500) Days” Gordon-Levitt blends these attributes in an unaffected, versatile portrayal of yearning. Trained as an architect, Tom has been sidetracked by toiling, successfully, for more than three years as a greeting card writer. Gordon-Levitt doesn’t play Tom as either angry or tortured; he’s pining for a partner and dissatisfied with his job, but he’s relatable in both his wisdom and his naivety. The Joy Division T-shirt fits hand-in-glove but the script and his discerning performance don’t oversell the self loathing of someone whose Hallmark aphorisms ring mockingly hollow to their own life.

The story doesn’t give Summer an opportunity to expound like it gives Tom. It’s one sided, but it’s the point (and the title) of the film; this is about Tom. He’s got two buddies to share his thoughts with as the relationship vacillates, and even a wise prepubescent little sister. So when Summer says to Tom, “we’re just friends,” we meet none of hers. A meaningful split screen sequence of expectations and reality isn’t the expected “he said/she said” but an insightful view into Tom’s competing visions. Already on the shortlist of the screen’s cutest chanteuses, Deschanel – with Hockney blue eyes as startling and vast as Crater Lake – is a credit to her role as the It girl for the IT crowd and shares an admirable, touching chemistry with Gordon-Levitt, who proves with her assistance that he’s got leading man flair along with his already established acting prowess.

Perhaps only Ryan Gosling resonates as a contemporary of comparable talent to Gordon-Levitt. (You could even see the two trading roles successfully; Gordon-Levitt flourishing in “Lars and the Real Girl” with Gosling succeeding in “The Lookout.”) While granite-chiseled lunks like Channing Tatum, Paul Walker and Shia LeBeouf have been hogging the box office this year, it would be heartening to see an actor of the pedigree of Gordon-Levitt, who assiduously and consistently selects his vital roles in engaging and lingering films, gain wider appeal. If one is wondering when this should be, then, in the words of The Smiths, “How soon is now?”


May 22nd, 2009

Coming in August. Quentin Tarantino’s Summer Blockbuster for the Indie World.

The divisive Lars von Trier returns with his latest contentious work, “Antichrist,” and Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times plays devil’s advocate as he pens a thoughtful essay on the film and the divergent reaction to the Danish enigma, which can be summed up by an enthralled First Showing’s Alex Billington exclaiming I had a blast watching this while Todd McCarthy of Variety says the auteur cuts a big fat art-film fart.

Opening on July 17, the postmodern, bittersweet love story “(500) Days of Summer” stars the adorable pair of “The Lookout”’s Joseph Gordon-Levitt and “Tin Man”’s Zooey Deschanel.

Kenneth Turan of the LA Times revels in Jane Campion’s “Bright Star” poetry while the New Zealand Herald’s Helen Barlow lauds the film as “Campion’s poetic comeback.”

One Film Wonder: “This is Spinal Tap” — the greatest mockumentary ever made — boasts not one but two one film wonders. David Kaff played the band’s loopy keyboardist, Viv Savage, and in the subsequent quarter century he has landed a half-dozen roles, mostly on Aussie telly. As the band’s latest ill-fated drummer, R.J. Parnell portrayed Mick Shrimpton with ciggy-dangling-from-the-lip rock and roll insouciance. Parnell was summarily typecast in his only other role; he was “Drummer” in 2004’s “The Devil’s Due at Midnight.” In Spinal Tap’s uproarious final credit sequence, both Savage and Shrimpton impart their succinct philosophies.


Watchmen & Coraline

All Hands on the Bad One

March 26th, 2009

coraline
I haven’t read a word or leafed a page of “Watchmen.“ This isn’t out of any contrarian strop. I can understand why folks become fervently obsessive with these works; I’m just not into the genre. But I don’t think it matters that I had no background with the books when I chose to see the ubiquitously hyped flick. Regardless of how lauded or important the source, a film exists as a completely separate artistic entity. One can argue that an acquaintance with the original inspiration helps with context but even this position is immaterial because a film must be viewed on its own merits. So I saw “Watchmen” with no preconceived notion and no specific expectation. But what is still surprising about the film based on the reverentially adored DC comic book series is how the transfer to the screen feels so pedestrian.

After a vibrantly choreographed fight sequence which culminates in the death of one of the Watchmen in 1985 and a vivid, slow-motion opening title sequence of flashbulbed World War II era photograph stills, the film settles into standard fare. The gist of the plot centers on a collection of formerly publicly vilified superheroes regrouping to solve the murder of their cohort, The Comedian (played by Robert Downey Jr. look-a-like Jeffrey Dean Morgan). There are themes aplenty; from the Cold War to imperialist capitalism to vigilantism, that a film with a more confident script and assured hand would have feasted on. But too often these critiques seem more like a suggestion than an examination.

The film carries a refreshing R rating, and it is admittedly a welcome change to view a multiplex cartoon blockbuster chockfull of cursing and nudity. But then, director Zack Snyder helmed “300,” a film which resembled an International Male catalogue with Tom of Finland serving as a wardrobe consultant. His 2006 box-office bonanza was asinine twaddle but its unflinching visual style was arresting and hardly spartan. “Watchmen” lacks the cohesive tone and the consistent visual dynamism of his predecessor. Too often, it takes a smoke (and mirrors) break. This is especially evident in a prison scene which is small, ordinary and unconvincing. If one was hoping to be swept into another world, then “Watchmen” disappoints.

One aspect of “Watchmen” that is most perturbing is the trite use of music. It‘s a soundtrack too familiar and too obvious. The decision to score a Vietnam battle scene with Wagner’s Ride of the Valkyries or play Simon and Garfunkel‘s “Sounds of Silence“ over a funeral falls flat, even if used ironically or plucked from the novel.

The cast delivers performances of variant quality. Patrick Wilson, a burgeoning notable American actor, plays Dan Dreiberg, the most contemplative and openly vulnerable of the superheroes, with a believable poignancy while he exudes a Batman-like swagger as his alter ego, Nite Owl. Rorschach, played earnestly by Jackie Earle Haley as though Danny Bonaduce was a member of Gwar, needs a chill pill or, at the very least, a Ricola.

But a few of the main characterizations are less convincing. As Silk Spectre, Malin Akerman looks like Xena’s little sister, with limbs like an Incredible, but her acting is hardly malleable. Topped by a Spandau Ballet haircut, Matthew Goode, so brooding in “The Lookout,” is a stilted Adrian Veidt, the former superhero Ozymandias who has become the wealthiest man. And Billy Crudup’s Dr. Manhattan is annoyingly omniscient as he delivers every line like a stilted pontification. It doesn‘t help that in his CGI’d getup he regularly plods around with his tadger out so that he looks like a particularly horny Blue Man Groupie.

So, “Watchmen” is not a terrible film but perhaps in its own way this is a worse fate: not kitschy enough to merit midnight madness and not poor enough to be hokum; it’s just ho-hum.

As uninspiring as “Watchmen” is, with a budget that exceeds its grasp of magical moviemaking, it’s a treat to behold the vision of Henry Selick in “Coraline.” The director of stop-motion animation gems such as “The Nightmare Before Christmas” and “James and the Giant Peach,” Selick and his hearty crew have fashioned a meticulous work drawn from the Neil Gaiman novella, which I haven‘t read either.

The tale of Coraline, an intrepid young girl, voiced by Dakota Fanning, who discovers an alternate universe within the walls of her new home, is a precise, precious and ornate 3-D feast. She has moved with her family from Pontiac, Michigan to the remote Northwest so that her author parents can write untroubled by distractions. But even in these secluded surroundings, her mother and father (Teri Hatcher and John Hodgman) indelicately indicate that their only child, who is simply a kid being an inquisitive kid, is a bit of a bother. Sporting a look that suggests she started listening to Sleater-Kinney at a precociously young age, Coraline discovers a nook in a wall of their Victorian rental which leads to a passageway where her “other” parents, now doting and not distracted, lavish her with fanciful foods and presents. Their buttons for eyes are the first, most visible sign that their devotion may come with a price.

In her new environs, Coraline lives amongst notably surreal characters, especially the neighbors who live in the adjacent apartments of the massive house. Two eccentric actresses, Miss Spink and Miss Forcible, bursting out from the top of their corsets and fawning over their pampered Scotties, entertain her with their almost indecipherable bickering, the interplay enhanced by the vocals of comedy duo Dawn French and Jennifer Saunders. In the alternate universe, they are transformed into cheeky mermaids in an uproarious scene perhaps more readily relished by adults. She also encounters Mister Bobinsky, a gymnastics performer of mind-boggling dexterity voiced with gusto by the mellifluously throated Ian McShane. Bobinsky is the ringmaster for a mice circus which performs a rousingly choreographed drill team song for the young girl. Coraline is befriended in both worlds by a wise black cat voiced by the honey dripped tone of Keith David.

The film is a stunning and exceedingly attractive achievement, enhanced by 3-D but not beholden to it. A kooky kaleidoscope of a garden is a shimmering blancmange of reds, oranges and blues. It’s also filled with beautiful, simple touches — the crystalline texture of snow, a shifting rug under Coraline‘s feet or tea leaves swishing in a cup are visual delights made all the more wondrous by the knowledge that these moments were created by the patient, hands-on care of artisans minutely shifting figures. Buoyed by Bruno Coulais’ soundtrack of jaunty harp music, the film is steadfastly clever while alternately and, in many instances, simultaneously creepy and funny. “Coraline” is an enchanting triumph.


Transsiberian

Ticket to Writhe

September 30th, 2008

trans
From Vladivostok, along the desolate Siberian railway line, through the scrutiny of the protagonists’ most personal turmoil, the engrossing thriller “Transsiberian” reveals its secrets like a matryoshka doll. A gripping mystery which ratchets up the suspense while exposing the intricate, introspective consequences, “Transsiberian” is a police drama with brains and brawn.

Upon completing a church mission in Beijing, a married, middle-class Iowa couple — Jessie (Emily Mortimer) and Roy (Woody Harrelson) — begins a sightseeing train journey to Moscow.  However, they aren’t drawn as Midwestern stereotypes because director Brad Anderson and co-writer Will Conroy infuse the characters with quirky individuality and plausible personality traits.  

Jessie is a thirty-something, adrift, agnostic, and ambivalent.  She does not despise the bourgeois lifestyle she could be slipping into; it just doesn’t feel quite right.  Jessie’s become a victim of her own expectation of herself.  And as a recovering addict, she not only confronts her alcoholism but the shame of her clear longing for the intoxicating allure of her partying days, the undeniable buzz of that lifestyle.  Jessie could be from Iowa, or Seattle, or Charleston, for that matter, and she’d still thirst for that time in her life when nihilism was just another way to say “make mine a double.”  In yet another nuanced performance, Mortimer emotes fragility but always girded with her doe eyes steely fixed.  

At first blush, Roy  may seem a bit of a sop, with a golly-gee wonderment at every small detail of railway life, but Harrelson doesn’t oversell the earnestness of the jocular, religious hardware store owner.  He is goofy, like the sort of guy who would mow his yard in black socks, yet he’s genuine, and he’s hardly the cuckold that you initially think he will become.  As a couple, they possess a clear fondness for each other, but their fundamental differences validate the choices the story has bestowed on them.

The relative ordinariness of their trip is usurped when they are joined as cabin mates by an enigmatically itinerant couple, the menacingly charming rascal Carlos (Eduardo Noriega) and his recalcitrant girlfriend Abby (Kate Mara).  Both Noriega and Mara embody their characters solidly, but the toothy Noriega, especially, chews the scenery with a wonderfully cheeky performance.  As Grinko, a sagacious yet still inquisitive cop, Ben Kingsley is similarly and fascinatingly multi-layered.  

Anderson is the director of indie features such as “Next Stop Wonderland” and “The Machinist” but he’s also helmed episodes of several of America’s most recently revered television police dramas, including “Homicide” and “The Wire.” And that TV experience of commingling gumshoe whodunit with insight into the peccadilloes and worse of intriguing characters is expertly manifested in several scenes where casual conversations subtly morph into an illuminating view into the characters’ psyches.

He also suffuses the railway journey with visceral earthiness and authenticity, from the claustrophobic sleeping compartments to the crowded and convivial proletariat dining cars choked with cigarette smoke, and crammed with hearty and craggy faces clinking shot glasses.

Like Scott Frank’s unjustly overlooked “The Lookout” from last year — a smart and absorbing crime flick that also centers on an equivocal Midwestern hero — “Transsiberian” unfurls a serpentine plot which, though carved with sinister switchbacks, retains a genuine attentiveness for the plight of the personal odyssey.  It’s noir, with a soul.