Posts Tagged ‘Watchmen’

 

A Single Man

True Loves Leaves A Trace

April 12th, 2010

a_single_man
The plaintive violins and robust trombones in the last four measures of Jean Sibelius’ Seventh Symphony, his final symphony, a symphony of one unbreakable movement, surge and undulate until a conclusion — described by musical theorist Arnold Whittall as “triumphantly abrupt” – in which the music not as much ends but ceases into lingering nothingness.

Everyone has a soundtrack for grief. That is mine. But that’s in the abstract. In reality, we likely don’t want to hear a thing while we mourn, we don’t wish to be reminded of the loss by a melody. George Falconer – the newly single man of Christopher Isherwood’s evocative novel and Tom Ford’s touching debut motion picture – can’t pick up an album in his Los Angeles home without freezing from the instantaneously heartbreaking memory of Jim. It’s November 1962, and only eight months have passed since the death of his partner of 16 years on a snowy Colorado road. He puts the album down; there are no revolutions for the phonograph yet. At the most recent weekly dinner with his longtime friend Charley — a fellow expatriate and the woman who consoled him on the evening he received the tragic news — George (Colin Firth) resolves to abide by an early New Year’s Resolution to simply “let go of the past.” So when he dances, he moves to the present. George and Charley gyrate in her opulent living room to Green Onions, released in August of 1962 and therefore debuting after his partner’s death so there’s no chance the song can provoke the past.

Still, George mourns. He finds himself prying his body out of bed in the morning. Unenthused, as his feet hit the floor, he falls into the routine of readying himself for teaching college literature. An Englishman, with a home on the West Coast for close to a quarter century, the sartorially splendid George armors himself with professorial effect. He has become, in the past months, a mannequin of tearless grief, and cloaked despondency inside. At the college, he walks across campus with a colleague (Pushing Daisies’ Lee Pace), engaged in a conversation but only peripherally as he focuses on the alluring bodies of two toned student tennis players. George has become a match of intellect versus sensation, a battle between the temporal and the everlasting. In his classroom, he lets the class prattle on about the themes of immortality in Aldous Huxley’s After Many a Summer Dies the Swan as he remains distracted by, well, everything. One student, Kenny, who remains quiet during the discussion, intrigues George (and unknowingly comforts him) when after class he confides in George that he’s naturally uncertain, befuddled by the past, present and future. Kenny (portrayed very nicely by Nicholas Hoult, who’s grown into a young actor of significance since his About a Boy appearance) is earnest and grasping but not desperate or clingy. His genuine discombobulation parallels George’s palpable sense of upheaval.

Jim remains a potent presence throughout the film. In flashback, Matthew Goode is warm, generous and gorgeous as Jim. Goode, who was so majestic in the sadly little-seen The Lookout and so misused in the bombastic Watchmen, is technically remarkable with his true accent undetectable in his American one. But what makes Goode such a strong actor is his effortless versatility. He’s endowed with the dashing good looks to play heartthrobs and possesses the talent to play darker, more complex characters. In A Single Man, despite a supporting role, he conveys the depth of devotion he felt for George, and makes one fully realize how much these men loved each other.

Photographed in cool light and swathed in diffuse colors, A Single Man is filmed at times as though through a finely shrouded gauze. The secluded, tree-shaded, open-floor planned modern home that George now shares with no one is accentuated with rosewood and teak. There’s a tenderness and consideration to the visual style Ford gives this tinted California, and his graceful direction – where he combines the perpetual-sunset veneer with emotionally meaningful moments — is highlighted by a brief encounter. On the way to Charley’s for dinner, George stops at a liquor store and literally bumps into Carlos, by all appearances a hustler. The brief role is played by Jon Kortajarena, a Spanish model with cheekbones like the edges of a hollowed out butternut squash, in a fine film debut. Shot with a dramatic backdrop, the scene doesn’t play out as expected and the kind, sweet vibe of the sequence is significant given its brevity.

Once he arrives for supper and cocktails, and makes it through her hallway of orange plants which is less a foyer than a grove, George and the gregarious Charley engage in the easy banter and simultaneously unrestrained personal condemnations of confidants. Verbal jabs, both those planned and those unintentionally landed and instantly apologized for, can be shared and absorbed between really good, seasoned friends. Julianne Moore, a marmalade minx decidedly less frumpy than her novel counterpart but no less sad, emotes her self pity with a forced laugh and an impeccably unforced English accent. She and Firth engage in illuminating abreactions and the script by Ford and co-writer David Scearce here crackles with witty, charged and substantial dialogue.

Later that same night, at the same bar where he first met Jim, but now a far different watering hole two decades on, George runs into Kenny for a drink. Kenny, who doesn’t know anything specifically about George’s loss, wonders if his teacher has learned anything from life’s experiences. George thinks, perhaps he hasn’t, and that he’s just become “sillier and sillier” It is in these scenes where Firth allows George, without forced alterations to the character, to let down his guard, even more so than he’d imagine with Charley. Vitally, Firth connects us to George’s attempts at catharsis. Both the novel and the film poignantly convey the common experience of mourning. We all fear death, and are connected by our collective dread at its inexorable presence and its irreversible legacy. But our grief is ours, alone.


Watchmen & Coraline

All Hands on the Bad One

March 26th, 2009

coraline
I haven’t read a word or leafed a page of “Watchmen.“ This isn’t out of any contrarian strop. I can understand why folks become fervently obsessive with these works; I’m just not into the genre. But I don’t think it matters that I had no background with the books when I chose to see the ubiquitously hyped flick. Regardless of how lauded or important the source, a film exists as a completely separate artistic entity. One can argue that an acquaintance with the original inspiration helps with context but even this position is immaterial because a film must be viewed on its own merits. So I saw “Watchmen” with no preconceived notion and no specific expectation. But what is still surprising about the film based on the reverentially adored DC comic book series is how the transfer to the screen feels so pedestrian.

After a vibrantly choreographed fight sequence which culminates in the death of one of the Watchmen in 1985 and a vivid, slow-motion opening title sequence of flashbulbed World War II era photograph stills, the film settles into standard fare. The gist of the plot centers on a collection of formerly publicly vilified superheroes regrouping to solve the murder of their cohort, The Comedian (played by Robert Downey Jr. look-a-like Jeffrey Dean Morgan). There are themes aplenty; from the Cold War to imperialist capitalism to vigilantism, that a film with a more confident script and assured hand would have feasted on. But too often these critiques seem more like a suggestion than an examination.

The film carries a refreshing R rating, and it is admittedly a welcome change to view a multiplex cartoon blockbuster chockfull of cursing and nudity. But then, director Zack Snyder helmed “300,” a film which resembled an International Male catalogue with Tom of Finland serving as a wardrobe consultant. His 2006 box-office bonanza was asinine twaddle but its unflinching visual style was arresting and hardly spartan. “Watchmen” lacks the cohesive tone and the consistent visual dynamism of his predecessor. Too often, it takes a smoke (and mirrors) break. This is especially evident in a prison scene which is small, ordinary and unconvincing. If one was hoping to be swept into another world, then “Watchmen” disappoints.

One aspect of “Watchmen” that is most perturbing is the trite use of music. It‘s a soundtrack too familiar and too obvious. The decision to score a Vietnam battle scene with Wagner’s Ride of the Valkyries or play Simon and Garfunkel‘s “Sounds of Silence“ over a funeral falls flat, even if used ironically or plucked from the novel.

The cast delivers performances of variant quality. Patrick Wilson, a burgeoning notable American actor, plays Dan Dreiberg, the most contemplative and openly vulnerable of the superheroes, with a believable poignancy while he exudes a Batman-like swagger as his alter ego, Nite Owl. Rorschach, played earnestly by Jackie Earle Haley as though Danny Bonaduce was a member of Gwar, needs a chill pill or, at the very least, a Ricola.

But a few of the main characterizations are less convincing. As Silk Spectre, Malin Akerman looks like Xena’s little sister, with limbs like an Incredible, but her acting is hardly malleable. Topped by a Spandau Ballet haircut, Matthew Goode, so brooding in “The Lookout,” is a stilted Adrian Veidt, the former superhero Ozymandias who has become the wealthiest man. And Billy Crudup’s Dr. Manhattan is annoyingly omniscient as he delivers every line like a stilted pontification. It doesn‘t help that in his CGI’d getup he regularly plods around with his tadger out so that he looks like a particularly horny Blue Man Groupie.

So, “Watchmen” is not a terrible film but perhaps in its own way this is a worse fate: not kitschy enough to merit midnight madness and not poor enough to be hokum; it’s just ho-hum.

As uninspiring as “Watchmen” is, with a budget that exceeds its grasp of magical moviemaking, it’s a treat to behold the vision of Henry Selick in “Coraline.” The director of stop-motion animation gems such as “The Nightmare Before Christmas” and “James and the Giant Peach,” Selick and his hearty crew have fashioned a meticulous work drawn from the Neil Gaiman novella, which I haven‘t read either.

The tale of Coraline, an intrepid young girl, voiced by Dakota Fanning, who discovers an alternate universe within the walls of her new home, is a precise, precious and ornate 3-D feast. She has moved with her family from Pontiac, Michigan to the remote Northwest so that her author parents can write untroubled by distractions. But even in these secluded surroundings, her mother and father (Teri Hatcher and John Hodgman) indelicately indicate that their only child, who is simply a kid being an inquisitive kid, is a bit of a bother. Sporting a look that suggests she started listening to Sleater-Kinney at a precociously young age, Coraline discovers a nook in a wall of their Victorian rental which leads to a passageway where her “other” parents, now doting and not distracted, lavish her with fanciful foods and presents. Their buttons for eyes are the first, most visible sign that their devotion may come with a price.

In her new environs, Coraline lives amongst notably surreal characters, especially the neighbors who live in the adjacent apartments of the massive house. Two eccentric actresses, Miss Spink and Miss Forcible, bursting out from the top of their corsets and fawning over their pampered Scotties, entertain her with their almost indecipherable bickering, the interplay enhanced by the vocals of comedy duo Dawn French and Jennifer Saunders. In the alternate universe, they are transformed into cheeky mermaids in an uproarious scene perhaps more readily relished by adults. She also encounters Mister Bobinsky, a gymnastics performer of mind-boggling dexterity voiced with gusto by the mellifluously throated Ian McShane. Bobinsky is the ringmaster for a mice circus which performs a rousingly choreographed drill team song for the young girl. Coraline is befriended in both worlds by a wise black cat voiced by the honey dripped tone of Keith David.

The film is a stunning and exceedingly attractive achievement, enhanced by 3-D but not beholden to it. A kooky kaleidoscope of a garden is a shimmering blancmange of reds, oranges and blues. It’s also filled with beautiful, simple touches — the crystalline texture of snow, a shifting rug under Coraline‘s feet or tea leaves swishing in a cup are visual delights made all the more wondrous by the knowledge that these moments were created by the patient, hands-on care of artisans minutely shifting figures. Buoyed by Bruno Coulais’ soundtrack of jaunty harp music, the film is steadfastly clever while alternately and, in many instances, simultaneously creepy and funny. “Coraline” is an enchanting triumph.